Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

Continuing to Drain the Swamp

The Real Reasons Why Paul Ryan Is Resigning From Congress

Steve Quayle calls him God’s Prosecutor. The Bible tells us that as we near the end days, all will be revealed. We are certainly seeing these things come to pass. Menwhile, Presient Trump has achieved some noteworthy goals.

The Stock Market is at an all-time high. Jobs are beginning to return to America. Trump has weathered the “Russian Collusion Delusion” storm to the point where the Deep State has had to manufacture sexual misconduct charges against the President. On balance, Presient Trump has been good for America. However, his polling numbers among his core have fallen significantly according to Fox News. Why? Because he supported the removal of Net Neutrality. Without the Independent Media, Trump would have not been elected. He has, for the time being, turned his back on his core and most ardent supporters. Perhaps, he is giving the FCC some rope and will spring into action when the censorship of his supporters takes full effect. Time will certainly tell. Regardless, Trump’s accomplishments have been nothing short of a miracle given the extreme obstacles he has faced from Democrats and even within his own party leadership  Among the Republican leadership that opposes President Trump is  the present Speaker of the House of Representatives, Paul Ryan.

With regard to Ryan, it can be accurately said that the swamp is being drained.

Paul Ryan’s Impending Departure

There is little doubt that as the clock ticks down on this present term for Congress, Paul Ryan will not be among those who are seeking re-election.

Sources close to Ryan have confirmed to Breitbart News that the Speaker is considering retiring after nine terms in the House. Politico published a report strongly confirming this speculation. According to Politico, “In recent interviews with three dozen people who know the speaker—fellow lawmakers, congressional and administration aides, conservative intellectuals and Republican lobbyists—not a single person believed Ryan will stay in Congress past 2018.”

The Politico piece claims Ryan “was tiring of D.C. even before reluctantly accepting the speakership” and that he “told his predecessor, John Boehner, that it would be his last job in politics and that it wasn’t a long-term proposition.”  And I can absolutely be certain of the fact that every word printed by Politico is nonsense. If you believe any of thes reasons on why Ryan is leaving the House, I have some swamp land in Florida.

The Real Reason for Ryan’s Departure

I had a recent conversation with my source that told me that the Bundy release from prison was imminent and this information came almost 3 days before Judge Navarro’s ruling.

The Common Sense Show has learned that Paul Ryan is on the verge of being exposed for his intimate connections to the “Never Trump Movement” and radical activist, Paul Singer, who financially supported Fusion GPS and the so-called “Trump Dossier” research.

For those that do not know, Singer is a billionaire and happens to be Paul Ryan’s top supporter. Singer has been conclusively linked to the discredited Russian dossier which has been repeatedly used by CNN to demean President Trump and impugn his credibility. Singer is a “Never Trump” participant and helped to fund the movement. Singer  is a primary force behind the Washington Free Beacon that admits it paid Fusion GPS for the original and fabricated negative research on President Trump.

Ryan is also intimately connected to others inside Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS is under investigation by the DOJ and charges are pending.

Additionally, I was told that Ryan is connected, in several ways to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation sponsored the illegal sale of uranium to Russia. I asked my source if Ryan was connected to this deal in the same manner as Mueller and was told that he was not an errand boy like Mueller. However, he has provided material support to the deal in ways that will be revealed at a later time. I was unable to obtain any further details. However, the information I received dow not appear to be proprietary. Got News is reporting on the Singer connection as well. I suspect that this release of information has been planted with multiple sources and will be appearing shortly all over the Internet.

The Swanp Is Being Drained

Paul Ryan’s head is undoubtedly the biggest trophy that the young Trump administration has garnered. His pending departure is sending shockwaves among the Deep State supporters.
Finally, I have learned that Ryan may be allowed to walk in exchange for his stepping down. Conventional wisdom is stating that a disgraced Ryan would hurt Trump’s chances at re-election.
We can only be left with one question: Who will be the next to nose dive into political oblivion?

Sign Up for DAVE’S Monthly Newsletter!

Signup today for free and be the first to get notified on new updates

And don’t worry, we hate spam too! You can unsubscribe at anytime.\
Advertisements

Dirty Rotten Scoundrels

ANTI-TRUMP LAWYER SOUGHT PAYMENTS FOR WOMEN TO ACCUSE TRUMP OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT

Read carefully, because it’s about to happen again

The revelation that a well-known anti-Trump women’s rights lawyer attempted to secure incentive money for women to claim Donald Trump sexually harassed them in the weeks leading up to the presidential election serves as a red flag for how this exact scenario is likely to play out again in the near future.

“California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000,” reports The Hill.

The lengthy article makes it clear that Bloom’s mission was to swamp Trump with allegations so as to ensure his defeat in the election, although perhaps over-confident of victory anyway, Clinton Super PACs were not interested in contributing money for women to come forward.

One of the most interesting aspects of the piece is how the woman who eventually declined as much as $750,000 to go public admitted that when she rebuffed Trump’s advances, he immediately backed off, which is not really the behavior you would expect of a habitual sexual harasser of women.

The woman told The Hill, “she held no resentment about the early 1990s advance because Trump stopped it as soon as she asked him.”

She also said she was “disgusted” to learn that Bloom had initially agreed to defend serial sex molester Harvey Weinstein back in October.

As we discuss in the video below, having largely failed to ensnare Trump on anything damning with the Russian collusion investigation, the political class is set to smear Trump by re-directing the outrage generated by the #MeToo scandal against the president.

Former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly says fake victims are being offered hundreds of thousands of dollars to publicly assert they were sexually abused by Trump. O’Reilly says that the claims are completely fraudulent but insiders hope the weight of allegations from a number of different women will be enough to force Trump to step down in January.

Some of the accusers who made the rounds before the election are re-appearing, with the media lavishing them with positive coverage despite new claims of Trump’s sexual abuse including asking for one woman’s phone number and calling another woman a rude word.

It is highly unlikely that Trump will step down simply on the basis of accusations alone, but the deep state is hoping that it will generate another cloud that will derail the president’s momentum on his policy agenda and help Democrats perform better in the mid-term elections.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: 

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

The Wicked Will Be Brought To Justice

Freedom Outpost

After Prosecution “Missteps” in Bundy Trial, is it All Over?- Jury Sent Home, Will Be Called Back “If They Are Needed”

 TIM BROWN  

On Monday, reports of prosecutor misconduct emerged in the Bundy Ranch trials, but you probably didn’t hear that in the mainstream media nor much of the alternative media.

I had been on vacation and was very limited in what I was able to write on during that time, but having come back, I’ve seen some of the reports, mainly from Shari Dovale at Redoubt News, who has been keeping the public informed, along with a few others of what is taking place in Nevada at what has been deemed “The Trial of the Century.

First, let me allow Terry Noonkester to update you on the misconduct aspect in the case by the prosecution and we’ll move on to whether this may result in the end of the trial.


Noonkester then listed those in the Bundy shakedown who have accepted plea bargains, many of which have families and believed they were facing such a corrupt system that their chances of having a fair trial in light of facing most, if not all, of their life in prison seemed reasonable.  Others were convicted, but their convictions should be called into question considering the obvious suppression of evidence by the prosecution that came out in the latest trial.


RELATED 

POSSIBLE MISTRIAL! IS THE GOV. GUILTY OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY IN BUNDY TRIAL?

FED GVT KILL LIST EXPOSED in BUNDY NEVADA TRIAL by JOHN LAMB

Crooked lawyers, hired guns, and dirty money, are alleged to have withheld exculpatory evidence from the jury in the Bundy Ranch Battle of Bunkerville protest trial in Las Vegas Nevada.

15-20

Trump Going After Obama-Appointed Liberal Judges

President Trump is making the political assassination of Obama appointed federal judges a hobby. Navarro and Contreras are the only the first 2 casualties of the war against the Deep State.

Sign Up for DAVE’S Monthly Newsletter!

Sayonara

SWAMP DRAIN: HOUSE SPEAKER PAUL RYAN TO EXIT CONGRESS

Report in Politico claims this is Ryan’s last term

Paul Ryan has indicated this will be his final term as Speaker of the House, a report from Politico claims.

According to the liberal-leaning publication, “Ryan has made it known to some of his closest confidants that this will be his final term as speaker.”

“He consults a small crew of family, friends and staff for career advice, and is always cautious not to telegraph his political maneuvers. But the expectation of his impending departure has escaped the hushed confines of Ryan’s inner circle and permeated the upper-most echelons of the GOP,” write Tim Alberta and Rachael Bade.

Politico notes Ryan is exiting even as he has experienced a “better-than-expected relationship with President Donald Trump,” who frequently criticized the Wisconsin representative on Twitter.

NO HEARING FOR YOU!

Preventing Blogging is Not a Governmental Interest.

For government to regulate speech, it must be “integral to criminal conduct.” United States v. Meredith, 685 F.3d 814, 819, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13012, 7, 2012-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,421, 110 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5157 (9th Cir. Cal. 2012) Typically, restriction of speech concerns a gang member not associating with other gang member; a child pornographer being monitored or restricted from the internet, defendant not speaking to victims, etc.. Speech is presumptively protected by the First Amendment. The burden is on the government to show that a defendant’s website is within one of the narrow categories of unprotected speech.

Suppressing speech rarely is justified by an interest in deterring criminal conduct, and in any event the justification “must be ‘far stronger than mere speculation about serious harms” and supported by “empirical evidence”

Protecting Reputation is Not a Government Interest.

If the Government were to say, ‘the families have been through enough and do not want to cause embarrassment or harm to their reputation’ – such would not be a proper Governmental interest. Specifically, protecting one’s reputation is not a governmental function unless it violates criminal law. 

Further, you have the right to attack people if you believe such behavior was unethical. See Wait v. Beck’s N. Am., Inc., 241 F. Supp. 2d 172, 183 (N.D.N.Y. 2003) (“[A s]tatement[] that someone has acted . . . unethically generally [is] constitutionally protected statements of opinion.”)

This is definitely vexatious litigation. Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender. Wikipedia

Anybody Sick Of This Yet???

 

One day before she is scheduled to appear at a court hearing on an Harassment Restraining Order filed against her, Dede Evavold has been caught lying in documents she submitted to a court in Dakota County.

Evavold has a court appearance tomorrow at the Dakota County Western Service Center in Apple Valley, for an evidentiary hearing on the Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) granted by a court in Dakota County.

In her Motion to Vacate the HRO filed with the court in Dakota County on Sunday, Evavold claimed she “filed a police report against David Rucki on 12/6/2017 with the Lakeville Police Dept…”   According to Evavold’s motion, she filed a police report against David Rucki for “falsely reporting a crime” committed by Evavold.


Year was bookended by big leadership changes in Lakeville

Jeffrey Long                    Lakeville Chief of Police

From: Dede Evavold [mailto:dedeevavold@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:35 PM
To: Long, Jeffrey <jlong@lakevillemn.gov>; Dronen, James <jdronen@lakevillemn.gov>
Subject: Police Report

To: Jeff Long, Lakeville Police Dept. Police Chief Phone: (952) 985-2800 Email: jlong@lakevillemn.gov
James Dronen, Lakeville Police Dept. (952) 985-2800 Email: jdronen@lakevillemn.gov
Lakeville Police Department
9237 183rd St W Lakeville, MN 55044
(952) 985-2800

Re: Falsely Reporting a Crime, Witness Tampering, Stalking, Harassment

Case #’s LA 17002499 and 17002613

On 7/26/2017, David Rucki filed a police report with Officer Ronald Hvinden indicating that Suspect Deirdre Evavold violated probation by posting public information online.

On 7/31/207 David Rucki was granted an Order for an Ex-Parte Harassment Restraining Order entered on July 28th, 2017 in Dakota Co. Court File No. 19AV-CV-17-1950.

On 8/04/2017 David Rucki filed a police report with Officer Ronald Hvinden indicating that Suspect Deirdre Evavold had violated the Harassment Restraining Order on 8/02/2017 and 8/03/2017 by posting public information online.

On 8/17/2017 David Rucki filed a police report with Officer Ronald Hvinden indicating that Suspect Deirdre Evavold had violated the Harassment Restraining Order on 8/15/2017 by posting public information online.

On 9/11/2017 Deirdre Evavold was charged with 3 counts of Violating a Restraining Order 609.748.6 (a) and 609.748.6 (b)

The basis of the HRO and HRO violation is blog posting with no threatening statements listed, no acts of harassment cited, and no proof that any posts constitute harassment or threats as defined by law.  David Rucki has falsely reported a crime and made material omissions and false claims of an immediate and present danger to get the malicious and capricious Ex-Parte HRO granted against me.

§609.505 Falsely reporting a Crime Subdivision 1. False reporting. Whoever informs a law enforcement officer that a crime has been committed or otherwise provides information to an on-duty peace officer, knowing that the person is a peace officer, regarding the conduct of others, knowing that it is false and intending that the officer shall act in reliance upon it, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A person who is convicted a second or subsequent time under this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

David Rucki also included his adult daughter Samantha Rucki as a petitioner on the Affidavit and Petition for Harassment Restraining Order with no police reports filed or signature of Samantha Rucki.

On June 7th, 2016, David Rucki engaged in witness tampering by harassing, threatening and intimidating me via the U.S. Mail in an attempt to alter my testimony in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s criminal case. (See Attached Hellmuth & Johnson extortion letter). David Rucki also coerced and intimidated his daughter Samantha Rucki into recanting her testimony for our criminal trials:

LAKEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT CASE/INCIDENT NUMBER 13001278

Q: Ok you are in a really tough spot and I totally understand that. Um no kid should ever have to be in this spot and you are in a tough one. But we are looking to see kind of what happened and how we got to this point. And l, my heart breaks for you Sam, it really does. Are you being forced to be here?

A: No but it’s definitely not on free will choice.

Q: Ok what do you mean by that?

A: They basically said I have to, and I have to be here and I have to recant everything I said and it’s gonna and that’s the way its gonna have to be and they made me feel really guilty about not doing it, I started crying

Q: Ok, who is they?

A: My dad and Tammy.

I filed a criminal complaint for witness tampering prior to my criminal trial with no action taken.

609.498 TAMPERING WITH WITNESS. Subdivision 1.Tampering with witness in the first degree. Whoever does any of the following is guilty of tampering with a witness in the first degree and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 1a:

(e) by means of force or threats of injury to any person or property, intentionally coerces or attempts to coerce a person to provide false information concerning a crime to law enforcement authorities;

(f) intentionally causes injury or threatens to cause injury to any person or property in RETALIATION against a person who has provided information to law enforcement authorities concerning a crime within a year of that person providing the information or within a year of the actor’s release from incarceration, whichever is later. (I was released from incarceration in January 2017).

Use with Stalking B. Influence/Tamper/Retaliate Juror/Judicial Proceeding/Officer Minnesota Offense Codes (MOC) Revised August 2010

David Rucki was able to harass and intimidate witnesses, interfere with the legal process and lie to law enforcement with impunity in our criminal trials and he continues to be allowed to do so.

The Lakeville Police Dept. is well aware of the fact that David Rucki has a well-documented history of coercion and intimidation and his five children, ex-wife, two neighbors and an in-law all successfully took out restraining orders against him. David Rucki also has a long history of violence including a bar fighta road rage incidentincidents of stalkingmultiple violations of restraining orders, and choking his wife.

609.749 STALKING As used in this section, “stalking” means to engage in conduct which the actor knows or has reason to know would cause the victim under the circumstances to feel frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated, and causes this reaction on the part of the victim regardless of the relationship between the actor and victim.

Directly or indirectly intending to injure the person, property, or rights of another. David Rucki filed a false personal injury case against me on 11/09/2017 in an attempt to extort further finances from my family.

David Rucki is using the criminal process for improper purposes and intentionally instituting and pursuing malicious legal actions against me. This is clear harassing and stalking behavior that is causing me to feel threatened and persecuted and I want this report filed to document the criminal activity of David Rucki.

Please send me a copy of the public portion of this incident report that includes the LA Case No.

Deirdre Evavold
3015 30th Street Ct. South
St. Cloud, MN 56301
(320) 293-6233


From: Long, Jeffrey [mailto:jlong@lakevillemn.gov]
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 9:41 AM
To: Dede Evavold <dedeevavold@hotmail.com>; Dronen, James <jdronen@lakevillemn.gov>
Cc: Kornmann, John <jekornmann@lakevillemn.gov>; Bastyr, Diane <dbastyr@lakevillemn.gov>
Subject: Proper Venue

Good Morning,

Thank you for your email.

If you are feeling harassed, stalked and threatened, you should immediately contact your local law enforcement agency to file a report.

Lakeville is not the proper jurisdiction/venue to file your report. Any criminal charges would be initiated by your local law enforcement agency with their Prosecutor or County Attorney’s Office for your area. If your local agency has any questions of us, they will request that information directly. That agency will determine the direction of an investigation.

For any additional concerns or questions, you will need to speak with your local authorities and/or County Attorney’s Office.  I encourage you to call them directly versus emailing them information.

Most agencies, including Lakeville, do not accept reports via email.


From: Dede Evavold [mailto:dedeevavold@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:42 PM
To: Long, Jeffrey <jlong@lakevillemn.gov>
Subject: RE: Proper Venue

Mr. Long,

I would like my response filed into David Rucki’s police report as a supplement to Case #’s LA 17002499 and 17002613. I’m reporting the crime of filing a false police report and his witness tampering which is Lakeville’s jurisdiction.

Deirdre Evavold
3015 30th Street Ct. South
St. Cloud, MN 56301
(320) 293-6233


From: Long, Jeffrey [mailto:jlong@lakevillemn.gov]
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 1:34 PM
To: Dede Evavold <dedeevavold@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Proper Venue

Thank you for your reply.

If you feel you are the victim of a crime, your local law enforcement agency will initiate a report.

At their request, we will work with that agency to assist them with their investigation into these allegations. If we were to add a supplement to a case file, it would be based on the investigation of your home agency.

In order to initiate the process, I encourage you to contact your local authorities by phone, versus email.  The sooner you do so, the fewer delays you will have in any potential investigation.

%d bloggers like this: