Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

Federalization of Local Police


Obama Is Turning the Local Police Against American Citizens

By  | 2016-05-30T11:41:58+00:00 May 30th, 2016

Is this what they need in Adamsville, Alabama to hand out parking tickets?

Is this what they need in Adamsville, Alabama to hand out parking tickets? This is the federalization of our local police forces and it having a devastating effect on local police and community relations.

The United States has more than 18,000 police departments. far more than any other nation. Each of the 50 states has its own Peace Officer Standards and Training board and officer / deputy certification criteria for more than 700,000 officers nationwide. Over the next several decades it’s likely that a more federalized policing model will replace this decentralized approach.

“Critics have argued for years that decentralized police administration fosters inherently poor-quality policing, tolerates racial bias, and makes it especially difficult to monitor and verify training and certification requirements across states. For many critics, federal intervention remains the remedy of choice. The current administration in Washington appears to agree.”

Continue Reading:

stcloudpdSt. Cloud Police Department


Local cops really excited about their terrifying new tank

Robby Soave     Reporter                                                                                           10:31 AM 10/22/2013


The police department in St. Cloud, Minnesota is excited to have a new means of transportation: a menacing, jet-black tank.

The tank will be the official method of transportation for the department’s SWAT team, which was accustomed to driving an old ambulance on “high-risk” missions, according to the St. Cloud Times.

But thanks to Minnesota’s Homeland Security office, the city was able to upgrade to a Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle, or MRAP. The tank is worth $400,000, but St. Cloud only paid a $3,000 transportation fee.

“We got to acquire a very expensive piece of equipment that has everything to do with our ability to do our job in a safe effective way,” said St. Cloud Police Lt. Jeff Oxton in reference to the armored car, which is designed for battlefield combat operations.

Read more:

The federal government is labeling any American that is anti-federal government in any way to be considered a domestic terrorist, and is setting up an elaborate ‘future crimes’ police state: Things are getting scary: Global police, pre crime and the war on domestic ‘extremists’, John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute

Strong Cities Network: Global Law Enforcement in US – No Congressional Consent

If you live in Atlanta, Denver, Minneapolis or New York City, you have the wisdom, or perceived wisdom, of “law enforcement global partners” working in your city to address violent extremism.”  The announcement by U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch came with the launch at the United Nations in New York City on September 29, 2015 … the United Nations, “a sharia-compliant world body …” There are 193 member nations in the United Nations. Of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) 57 states, 56 are member states of the UN. Have you wondered what happened to Syria’s seat in the U.N.? Well, of course, that peace-loving body yanked it and then handed it over to the ‘freedom fighters/rebels.’ In October 2013, the United Nations issued a statement advocating for “greater ties with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to resolve conflict in the Middle East ….” So how’s that working out for the “global partners?” And before I get to the Department of Justice announcement on the Strong Cities Network, I have to show you this from the U.N.policies are being applied in the United States, through local initiatives and now we’re going to see a global police force.

Continue Reading:



Civil Unrest Heating Up in St. Cloud

Vandalism reported at Baptist church  

St. Cloud Times    TIMES STAFF REPORT 3:07 p.m. CDT May 27, 2016

(Photo: Dave Schwarz,                                       


A derogatory message was discovered Friday morning on the exterior of a St. Cloud church.

Granite City Baptist Church, 1425 Stearns County Road 134, had spray painted obscenities on the front of the building.


Continue Reading Below:       

Below is a letter that was written by a St. Cloud resident and sent to some of the leaders that signed the “HATE Pledge”.                              

More people take pledge against hate



The SILENCE is deafening…except for the crickets chirping the city is a bed, people with pillows over their head or more likely buried in the sand while a HATE crime goes unnoticed, virtuously unreported as the Times down plays the whole ordeal. Sadly the people of our fair city also chose to ignore this, the mayor, the church leaders, the city council, the concerned hate pledge signers who were so PROUD to have their names displayed in the paper stating that THEY would not tolerate hate…

This same St. Cloud Times that had a two day spread on it’s famous Sign our Against HATE Pledge!!!

This same St. Cloud Times that had numerous days and pages of “mosque vandalism” reported ACCUSING White Cloud of these heinous unforgivable hate-filled acts (which were later to be found to have been cause by one of their own)

Where are all those SELF-RIGHTEOUS church leaders who are usually out front and center for any photo op that makes them look loving to ALL in the community.


xxxxx (name omitted for privacy issues) has initiated a one time fund raising gesture for graffiti removal at Granite city Baptist Church. Due to a $5000 insurance deductible, this criminal incident is not covered. The paint slapped on the face of this Christian Church was indirectly a slap across the face of each of us. Pastor Campbell has offered us the use of his facility numerous times without cost. He has greeted and treated us cordially and provided us with cookies and beverages. Join us with an acknowledgement of gratitude and assistance as he undertakes cleanup and restoration at his Church. Help to keep our channels and avenues of free speech open for future events. Please remember this was a hate crime directed at what we as a group believe in; let your heart dictate your actions.

All donations from $1, $5 and up are welcomed and tax deductible. Checks or money orders only please made out to Granite City Baptist Church.

donations to:  PROFESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS, PO Box 541, St.Cloud, Mn 56302

Faith leaders stand in solidarity after mosque damaged


STC 1222 Mosque Tour 1.jpg

(Photo: Kimm Anderson,

Dayton blunt in MN forum: Anyonewho can’t accept immigrants ‘should find another state’


So what’s the big picture? Divide and Conquer ~ Control out of Chaos!

The fundamental transformation occurring in the United States is being accelerated by flooding the US with people from third world countries. St. Cloud and other towns are being bankrupted because they are providing humanitarian aid with our taxpayer dollars..Loyalty to the government will be created because these people will be dependent on subsidies to survive. This is simply a tool used to play one or more racial or ethnic groups against another. This technique was developed by Marxist ideologues who used multiculturalism in Russia to divide and conquer resistance to the institution of a communist state.

This is all about exerting control, collapsing the economy and is a PLANNED TAKE DOWN OF AMERICA.

Create the problem ~ Incite a reaction from the public ~ Propose a solution which involves a military intervention, the loss of liberties or both.

♦ 190 US Cities To Receive Syrian Refugees by All News Pipeline

Excerpt from: Social Unrest is Here to Stay: Here’s How to Protect Yourself – The Daily Reckoning 

By Genevieve LeFranc

In an op-ed entitled “The Pitchforks Are Coming… For Us Plutocrats,” billionaire and venture capitalist Nick Hanauer taps into that very notion of “it’ll never happen to me.” He writes:

Many of us think we’re special because “this is America.” We think we’re immune to the same forces that started the Arab Spring—or the French and Russian revolutions, for that matter.

Here’s what I say to you: You’re living in a dream world.

What everyone wants to believe is that when things reach a tipping point and go from being merely crappy for the masses to dangerous and socially destabilizing, that we’re somehow going to know about that shift ahead of time.

Any student of history knows that’s not the way it happens. Revolutions, like bankruptcies, come gradually, and then suddenly. One day, somebody sets himself on fire, then thousands of people are in the streets, and before you know it, the country is burning.

It’s time for us to wake up and smell the civil strife, folks!

In an article on The New American titled “Prediction: Economic Collapse, Civil Unrest in America by 2016,” author Selwyn Duke echoes the same sentiment, writing:

Violence. Rioting. Looting. Economic collapse and civil unrest. This isn’t a dystopian movie plot, but something else according to an economist with a good track record for prognostication: America’s dark future.

The economist is Martin Armstrong, whose correct predictions include the 1987 Black Monday crash and the 1998 Russian financial implosion. And now he’s predicting civil unrest in America by 2016, precipitated by an economic collapse which he calls “the magic ingredient.” “Turn the economy down,” he continued, “and you get civil unrest and revolution.”

And what would precipitate our economic collapse? Many observers have warned that our runaway spending and loose monetary policy constitute a ticking time-bomb… Of course, some will say that the United States isn’t Hungary or Zimbabwe. But we should seriously wonder what we will be tomorrow if we won’t stop digging an economic grave with credit cards, counterfeit cash, and covetousness cloaked in compassion.

Continue Reading:

Police Misconduct

Activist Post

Chicago Investigator Blows Whistle on Corrupt Police Review Board

A former investigator with Chicago’s Independent Police Review Authority has filed a lawsuit claiming that he was fired for refusing to produce false reports regarding officers accused of misconduct.

Lorenzo Davis began working with Chicago’s Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA) in 2008 as an investigator after 23 years with the Chicago Police Department. By July 2010, he was promoted to supervising investigator before moving up to deputy chief administrator in October 2011 and finally, chief administrator in February 2014.

Courthouse News reports

As his boss, Davis says, “Ando began ordering plaintiff to change his sustained findings of police misconduct … in favor of the accused officers.”

He claims that Ando and Mitchell told him “to change the content of his investigative reports to more favorably reflect upon the accused officers’ conduct or to discredit the victim or witnesses.”

He wasn’t the only one, Davis says: “Ando and Mitchell also ordered other IPRA investigators to change the contents of their investigative reports and change their ultimate findings from sustained to not sustained, unfounded or exonerated.”

The IPRA was originally formed in 2007 to investigate other accusations of police corruption and misconduct. Unfortunately, the agency has itself been the subject of misconduct and corruption. In fact, in December 2015, Ando resigned from his position as head of the IPRA just as it was announced that the U.S. Department of Justice would begin an investigation into the CPD. The IPRA’s reputation has become so tarnished that in early April, the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune wrote, “the IPRA and its reputation are beyond repair. The way forward is clear: Blow it up. Start over.”

Only weeks ago Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced plans to completely end the IPRA in favor of a “new civilian investigative agency that has more independence and more resources to do its work.” Emanuel’s plan mimics a report from the Police Accountability Task Force, organized by Emanuel after the death of Laquan McDonald, which calls for the creation of a new review board. According to the Better Government Association, between 2010 and 2014 Chicago police shot 240 people, killing 70.

Both the Chicago Police Department and the IPRA are under fire for corruption, abuse, and possible criminal behavior. At this point the idea that the Mayor (another representative of the establishment) could realistically root out the poison that seems to infected the core of the Chicago Police Department is preposterous. All of these bureaucracies exist to sustain themselves and to subvert the will of the people. This is because these institutions are dependent on the people for funding (stolen via taxation) and ultimately serve the will of the State.

Imagine what would happen if our communities started organizing against these violent criminals and peacefully prevented the murder of our people? It’s time to start having those conversations.

Image Credit

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for and the founder of the Follow him on Twitter.

Derrick is available for interviews.

This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

Facebook Bans Conservatives For Complaining About Censorship

Social media giant back to its old ways despite much heralded meeting with conservatives

The ban came after a post was removed which merely argued that Donald Trump was not anti-Muslim.

Lauren 2





Continue Reading: http://_wp_link_placeholder



Why Should Anyone Need a License for Anything?

Voluntary is good

Republicans vote against re-endorsing Michelle MacDonald

May 20, 2016

DULUTH, Minn. — Michelle MacDonald’s campaign for the Minnesota Supreme Court this year will have to proceed without support from the Republican Party of Minnesota.

MacDonald won the GOP’s endorsement in 2014, when she lost to incumbent justice David Lillehaug 53.2 percent to 46.5 percent. But the party disavowed her after reports of a driving while intoxicated arrest, leading to a dispute in which MacDonald sued the party and was ejected from its booth at the Minnesota State Fair.

This year, MacDonald was the only candidate to ask for the party’s endorsement. A committee assigned to consider the matter judged her qualified and recommended the party endorse her again.

But a blistering dissent from two members of that committee said MacDonald was unworthy of a spot on the Supreme Court. By a voice vote after more than half an hour of discussion, the GOP state convention voted against endorsing any candidates.

MacDonald can still run for the court seat currently held by Justice Natalie Hudson this fall without the party endorsement. She filed for the race on Friday. Also in the race are Hudson and Craig Foss.

Earlier this year, the Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld a jury’s conviction of MacDonald for refusing a blood-alcohol test and obstructing legal process during a 2013 arrest. She had been acquitted of a misdemeanor drunken driving charge in the case.


Normalizing Pedophilia

We Are On the Road To Normalizing Pedophilia

 streiff (Diary)  |  

This has been coming for years. Ever since Anthony Kennedy decided that his view of human sexuality was the only one permitted in the United States we have been gathering speed in what will inevitably be the declaration by the Supreme Court that pedophilia is a Constitutionally protected right and the EEOC and other federal agencies will set about making us honor that particular perversion.

Back in September we saw one of the first blatant efforts to legitimize pedophilia. Salon published a piece titled I’m a pedophile, but not a monster (ummm, no).

Continue Reading:


Leftist news outlet plays dreamy footage of child as pedophile discusses sick fantasy
Paul Joseph Watson – MAY 20, 2016

A video posted on Salon’s Facebook page shows the leftist news organization’s resident pedophile, Todd Nickerson, explaining how he masturbated over a 5-year-old girl while romanticized video footage of a child is used to illustrate his sick fantasy.

Nickerson first rose to prominence when gave him a platform to explain how lusting after children was merely an alternative “sexual orientation” and that people should be “understanding and supportive” towards pedophiles.

When conservatives dared to express skepticism towards that premise, Nickerson immediately claimed to be a victim of the “right-wing hate machine” in an article entitled I’m a pedophile, you’re the monsters.

If you thought that Salon couldn’t go any lower than this, then think again.

A new video features Nickerson talking about how he fell in love with a 5-year-old girl he was babysitting who was “advanced for her age”.

“A lot of my fantasies actually revolve around little girls who are in some way more powerful than I am,” states Nickerson as footage plays of a child in a pink dress dancing and twirling.

“Eventually my attraction became overwhelming to the point I had to go relieve myself in the bathroom,” says Nickerson.
In other words, Nickerson masturbated over a 5-year-old girl he was sexually attracted to, and thinks it’s in good taste to illustrate this sickness with a dreamy clip of a 5-year-old girl playfully dancing.

Nickerson goes on to explain how there are more pedophiles than society thinks and that he has met a lot of them online.

Although Nickerson and Salon have tried to argue that ‘supporting’ pedophiles who manage to resist the urge to molest children is a positive thing, Nickerson has previously admitted that he “WOULD engage in sex play with a child that I loved if she wanted it and initiated it. I will never deny that.”

Nickerson also claimed that children like pedophiles and desire to be around them, and that the 5-year-old girl he was babysitting once “came onto” him.





Ralph Underwager and Wife Hollida Wakefield

Ralph Underwager (1929 –2003) was an American minister and psychologist who rose to prominence as a defense witness for adults accused of child sexual abuse in the 1980s and 1990s. Until his death in 2003, he was the director of the Institute for Psychological Therapies is a research group for clinical psychology   in Northfield, Minnesota which he founded in 1974. Wikipedia

Hollida Wakefield (Vita)  Hollida Wakefield has been providing evaluation, assessment, and treatment for sexual offenders and victims of sexual abuse since 1976. She has conducted several research projects dealing with various questions about child sexual abuse and written extensively in the area. She has conducted professional workshops around the world in how to interview children so as to allow them to provide the most reliable information they can.  She provides expert consultation and forensic services in a wide range of legal issues including sexual abuse, sexual harassment, and sexual assault.

Ms. Wakefield and Dr. Underwager are the publishers of the journal, “Issues in Child Abuse Accusations.” They co-edited the volumes: “Accusations of Child Sexual Abuse” and “The Real World of Child Interrogations.” They have written numerous articles on the interrogation of children, the role of the psychologist in assessing child abuse cases, the evaluation of child witnesses, and the manipulation of the child abuse system. They regularly appear as expert witnesses and give training sessions to jurists, psychologists, and laymen.

He is accused of being a supporter of pedophilia because of controversial statements he made in an interview to Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia Underwager was also closely associated with the fathers’ rights (a founding board member of the Childrens Right Council -CRC) until he resigned after exposure of his pro-pedophilia interview published in the Dutch based journal “PAIDIKA”, which labels itself as “The Official Journal for Advocating the Lifestyle of the Pedophile

 Interview in Amsterdam in June 1991 by “Paidika,” a European pro-pedophile publication. Editor-in-Chief, Joseph Geraci

PAIDIKA: Is choosing paedophilia for you a responsible choice for the individuals?  

RALPH UNDERWAGER:  Certainly it is responsible. What I have been struck by as I have come to know more about and understand people who choose paedophilia is that they let themselves be too much defined by other people. That is usually an essentially negative definition. Paedophiles spend a lot of time and energy defending their choice. I don’t think that a paedophile needs to do that. Paedophiles can boldly and courageously affirm what they choose. They can say that what they want is to find the best way to love. I am also a theologian and as a theologian, I believe it is God’s will that there be closeness and intimacy, unity of the flesh, between people. A paedophile can say: “This closeness is possible for me within the choices that I’ve made.”

Paedophiles are too defensive. They go around saying, “You people out there are saying that what I choose is bad, that it’s no good. You’re putting me in prison, you’re doing all these terrible things to me. I have to define my love as being in some way or other illicit.” What I think is that paedophiles can make the assertion that the pursuit of intimacy and love is what they choose. With boldness, they can say, “I believe this is in fact part of God’s will.” They have the right to make these statements for themselves as personal choices. Now whether or not they can persuade other people they are right is another matter (laughs).

Continue Reading:


Family Court Corruption, Part 2: Fathers’ Rights and Conciliation Court Law: Federally funded misogyny and pedophile protection  by Cindy Ross © 2/19/03

Numerous reports have identified bias against women and corruption in family courts across the country. In bizarre and illegal rulings, family court judges ignore or deliberately suppress evidence of male perpetrated family violence and child molest. Fathers who are batterers and sex offenders are routinely granted visitation and custody, while mothers and children trying to escape abuse are punished through financial sanctions, loss of custody,  supervised visitation, jail and institutionalization. [1]

Very occasionally, men reporting abuse of their children have also been targeted for retaliation through family court. [2] However, the systematic mishandling of domestic violence and child molest cases as “custody disputes”  is based in a financial corruption scheme that calls for diverting grant program funding through “high conflict” cases, in the guise of promoting “fatherhood” and “shared parenting” post-divorce. [3]

Rather than assisting men become responsible parents, “Responsible Fatherhood”, “Access to Visitation Enforcement” (supervised visitation for noncustodial parents), “Child Support Enforcement” and similar federal programs perpetuate abuse of women and children through the legal system. [4] Abusive men striving to maintain control over their victims are provided an array of benefits, not only to get custody and get out of paying child support, but to terrorize the mothers of their children and society in general. [5] Government programs are not producing responsible fathers, but motherless children, in order to advance the agenda of the so-called “fathers’ rights” movement.

“Fathers’ rights” as a political agenda, has nothing to do with actual parenting rights or responsibilities. Fathers’ rights organizations are misogynist anarchy and militia groups that define fatherhood in terms of male ownership of children in male-headed households. In order to maintain control over “families”, fathers’ groups promote violence, advocating the use of “domestic discipline”. [6] Their membership is comprised of virulent men “fighting feminism” and affirmative action, establishing “patriarchy under God” and even trying to repeal the 19th Amendment. [7]

There are women affiliated with fatherhood groups, primarily second wives who support their husbands in denying ex-wives and biological mothers the right to parent their own children. Identifying themselves as “independent feminists”, they also join sociopathic men in fighting obscenity laws and identifying sex and access to pornography as primary fathers’ “rights”. [8]

Fathers’ rights groups have devised strategies that normalize deviant male behavior, while pathologizing normal motherhood. When mothers report domestic violence or child sexual abuse, their complaints are dismissed as a matter of  “radical feminists” making malicious and false allegations to turn children against fathers. “False allegations” is the primary tactic used to provide assistance with litigation against women trying to maintain custody of their children in divorces from abusive men. [9]

Criminalizing mothers’ attempts to protect their children, legalizing corporal punishment and normalizing father-child sex, are all necessary in order to legitimize court rulings granting pedophiles, batterers and other abusive men visitation rights and custody of children. In family court, this is accomplished through the “Parental Alienation Syndrome” (PAS) legal strategy. [10]

Continue Reading:

Torture the Little Children? The Catholic Church Says It’s Not Responsible

A Documentary, 'Beyond The Headlines: Amanda Knox' Is Your ...At a United Nations hearing the Vatican tries to turn the moral question of whether child abuse is torture into a legal debate about jurisdictions.

This may come as a huge surprise to many Catholics, but the Holy See is claiming it doesn’t really bear legal responsibility for how they or even their priests behave. Too good to be true? Actually, too horrible to be believed. What the Vatican is claiming this week before a United Nations panel is that, really, the question of priests sexually abusing little kids is a matter for local law enforcement. And, no, the physical pain and mental anguish inflicted on children by pedophile prelates should not be called “torture,” at least as defined by the U.N.

When the Vatican’s U.N. ambassador appeared in front of the U.N.’s Convention Against Torture in Geneva on Monday, the issues were about jurisdiction, not spiritual guidance and the Roman Catholic Church’s moral responsibility for errant clerics. “It should be stressed, particularly in light of much confusion, that the Holy See has no jurisdiction over every member of the Catholic Church,” said Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, who represented the Vatican as a signatory of the convention on torture.

Continue Reading:

%d bloggers like this: