The jury started deliberations in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case at 1:00 pm today. No verdict reached. Will resume deliberations on Thursday, July 28th at 9:00 am.
At the beginning of this trial, a sign was posted on the courtroom door that stated:
In order to ensure a fair trial, the Court hereby issues the following ORDER:
1. All electronics devices must be powered off, or subject to confiscation for the length of the trial.
2. No audio or video recording of any form.
3. No person may wear clothing or accessories that are designed to influence the jury.
4. Any person who diisplays facial expressions or utters verbal outbursts that may influence the jury or witnesses will be removed from the courtroom.
5. Any person who violates this order will be removed from the courtroom and may be found in contempt of court and subject to the penalties therefor.
Signed by Judge Aspaugh
Okay, let’s recap some of the fairness that Dakota County has demonstrated in 19HA-CR-15-2669 State of Minnesota vs Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.
- Illegal withholding of evidence.
- Wrongful arrest and imprisonment by US Marshals based on fabricated charges by Lakeville PD. Charges: Assaultive Felony – Fugitive- Kidnap Minor
- Excessive Bail: ONE MILLION DOLLARS–Reason? Determination that Grazzini-Rucki presented a significant flight risk. Prosecutor Phil Prokopowicz acknowledged that the bail amount was large, given the charges, but argued that it took nine weeks for federal authorities to find Grazzini-Rucki. Unwarranted: Was the Arrest Warrant Against Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Improperly Handled?
- Unfair chance to present a defense: All criminal charges against David Rucki were ruled inadmissable by Judge Karen Aspaugh at the beginning of the trial. David Rucki-Judge Knutson-Criminal Defense Matters. Today, Dakota County Assistant Attorney Kathryn Keena objected 4 times throughout the closing arguments of the defense. When questioned regarding reason, she stated “never mind.” Numerous other disruptive behaviors noted during the closing arguments: Keena ripping paper, Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom shifting loudly in his seat (why is he even there?) and David Rucki leaving and returning to the courtroom. Sounds to me like they’re a little nervous, so maybe the jury isn’t rigged after all?!
- Collusion – where two persons enter into a deceitful agreement,usually secret, to defraud and/or gain an unfair advantage over a third party. David Rucki, Dakota Co. and media haven’t even pretended to maintain a discreet appearance in front of the public.
It should also be noted that David Rucki was shaking hands with Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom in the court hallway today.
- Witness Tampering AIDING AND ABETTING IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Charge Stacking: The practice of charge stacking is a simple and terribly effective method for prosecutors looking to win cases. The technique entails finding as many possible criminal counts to “stack” against the defendant in order to strengthen the core case of the prosecution.This strategy is made wide open to prosecutors, because the main deterrent against stacking charges is the law of double jeopardy. Charge Stacking: Gambling with People’s Lives
It’s always been the State’s position that the girls didn’t run away.” Kathryn Keena Assistant Dakota County Attorney (Stated at the May 12th Contested Omnibus Hearing ~ State of MN vs. Doug and Gina Dahlen).
Don’t change that dial. We’ll have more tomorrow!
Some content on this page was disabled on November 8, 2017 as a result of a DMCA takedown notice from Michael Brodkorb. You can learn more about the DMCA here: