Part 2 – Inside Story Of The Rigged High-Profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Criminal Case

lion news

LION NEWS IS A LOCAL GRASSROOTS MEDIA OUTLET. LION NEWS FOCUSES IN ON LOCAL CORRUPTION.   

Grigsby

Stephen Grigsby & Michelle MacDonald

Are you ready for installment #2 of the Inside Story Of The Rigged High-Profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Criminal Case No.19HA-CR-15-2669? Hmm?
MacDonald’s co-author and hack Michael Volpe had a hissy fit over the first installment, didn’t he?  Oh, you didn’t know that MacDonald and Volpe were writing a book about the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case? It has the following idiotic title: “Frogs in water: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the world’s last child custody trial,” hasn’t it? It’s one of those teaching books written by an incompetent, isn’t it?

 

Complaint Summons

It is the responsibility of your criminal defense attorney to gather any and all favorable evidence that tends to prove your innocence.  Thus, you need to make sure your criminal defense attorney holds prosecutors to their obligation to turn over ALL favorable evidence.  Effective criminal defense attorneys are proactive: a defense attorney must not hesitate to seek sanctions against a prosecutor whom fails to uphold their Brady obligation. Brady Obligations: Make Sure Your Lawyer Gets ALL of the Evidence! January 27, 2012 By Katie Riggs, arrestedmn.com – Ryan Pacyga, Criminal Defense Attorney – Minnesota Lawyer License No: 0321576 (Emphasis added)

Image Courtesy of Stuart Miles @ FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image Courtesy of Stuart Miles @ FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Being smart enough to read and comprehend a law book, I knew that Gisgsby was lying through his teeth, didn’t I?  In fact, I even told Grigsby that I knew an attorney who was sanctioned in a criminal case, didn’t I?

BLUE EARTH — The Faribault County Attorney’s Office is seeking sanctions against the defense lawyer for the deported Blue Earth-area priest convicted of inappropriately touching an underage girl. Faribault County Attorney Troy Timmerman filed the request this month claiming defense attorney Philip Elbert, who represented former Diocese of Winona priest Leo Koppala, leaked a significant amount of non-public documents to an online blogger without redacting sensitive information. The documents appear on the blogger’s website and a related Youtube video, which featured a recorded conversation between Elbert and the blogger about providing the documents. County attorney seeks sanctions in priest case By Josh Moniz, the rag called the Mankato Free Press.com Jun 18, 2014 (Emphasis added) http://www.mankatofreepress.com/news/local_news/county-attorney-seeks-sanctions-in-priest-case/article_52865758-a915-59b3-b5ea-a6e809b609dd.html

Hostile Grigsby tried bullying me into thinking that I didn’t know what I was talking about, didn’t he?  I even told Grisgby that there was a newspaper article about the attorney getting sanctioned, didn’t I?  (I forgot to mention that I was mentioned in the article, didn’t I?)

Attorney Philip Elbert reminded the judge of a rule from the Minnesota rules of criminal procedures. Elbert explained that any others who participated in the investigation, and who regularly report to the prosecutor, must disclose any information. “All officers, part-time or not, report to the prosecutor,” Elbert says. Ruling favors priest Defense entitled to full disclosures October 27, 2013 by Brock Buesing – Register Staff Writer (bbuesing@faribaultcountyregister.com) , Faribault County Register

Grigsby turned his bullying up another notch by insisting that I wasn’t even smart enough to comprehend a simple newspaper article, didn’t he? \But no matter how hard he tried Grigsby couldn’t bully me off the truth, could he? He couldn’t, could he?

Lion News: Father Koppala Framed? Interview With Koppala Defense Attorney Philip Elbert?
http://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2014/05/lion-news-father-koppala-framed.html

The reality is that Grigsby should have and actually still can still file sanctions in rigged high-profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki criminal case no.19HA-CR-15-2669.

ID-100411976

Image courtesy of sirirakphotos at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Gaslighting is a type of projective identification in which an individual (or group of individuals) attempt to influence the mental functioning of a second individual by causing the latter to doubt the validity of his or her judgments, perceptions, and/or reality testing in order that the victim will more readily submit his will and person to the victimizer. (See Chapter 2 for a more comprehensive discussion of gaslighting.) Gaslighting, The Double Whammy, Interrogation and Other Covert Control in Psychotherapy & Analysis, Theo L. Dorpat (Maryland: 2004), Page 6.

The reality also is that Grigsby is just as much of trained and professional liar as corrupt Dakota Co. Attorney James “Sovereign Citizen” Backstrom, right? Finally, it is a reality that neither Grigsby nor MacDonald want to admit that their bungling and aiding & abetting Backstrom got Sandra convicted, isn’t it?

 

… that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!  Isaiah 5:20King James Version (KJV)

It’s trivia question time, isn’t it?Question Mark
Trivia Question #2: Which of Sandra’s attorneys couldn’t even get their discovery/evidence (Dash cam video) in their own criminal case? Hint: Did you know that the attorney’s former campaign manager was able to get the attorney’s citation in searchable pdf format? Yet, the attorney was not able to, were they?

Was it?:
A. Short-time criminal defense attorney Michelle MacDonald
B. So-called defender of the constitution Michelle MacDonald
C. Supreme court candidate Michelle MacDonald

Trivia Question #2 Answer:  A, B, C

It’s history time, isn’t it?

https://twitter.com/missinginmn/status/758673275073417217
Missing in Minnesota @missinginmn UPDATE: Grazzini-Rucki arrived at the court – impeccably dressed. Stephen Grigsby was seen yelling at her in the parking lot. #grazzinirucki Retweet 1 Likes 5 S Zizzou Sam Sansevere Tony Jones Pam Nelson Jenny Love Nathan M. Hansen 7:39 AM – 28 Jul 2016

Caroline Rice describes Grigsby as a bully, doesn’t she? She does, doesn’t she?

Case No. 10-CR-10-1003 State of Minnesota vs Caroline Marie Rice
Amended Disposition (Judicial Officer: Perkins, Richard C.) Reason: Prosecution motion granted, Appeals Court Reversal
1. Deprive Custody/Parent Rights-Cause Child Being Runaway (Not applicable – GOC) Dismissed
2. Deprive Another-Cust/Parental Rights-Conceal Minor Dismissed
3. Deprive-Custody/Parent Rights-Violation Court Order-Take Minor Dismissed

It’s safe to say that Sandra was bullied and intimidated into accepting the false idea that nothing could be done about the obstruction of justice in her rigged case, isn’t it?  It is also safe to say that Sandra was bullied and intimidated into accepting the false idea that she couldn’t have her own files/property to prepare for the rigged trial, isn’t it?

More damning revelations in installment #3, right?

More to come . . .

Some content on this page was disabled on November 8, 2017 as a result of a DMCA takedown notice from Michael Brodkorb. You can learn more about the DMCA here:

https://en.support.wordpress.com/copyright-and-the-dmca/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s