The Down and Dirty in Dakota County on the Fraudulent HRO filed Against Dede Evavold …
Fraudulent Harassment Restraining Order filed against Dede Evavold, co-defendant in Grazzini-Rucki criminal trial, on July 28, 2017. HRO fails to prove any harassment or threat actually happened, fails to meet legal standard of harassment.
HRO petition includes many procedural errors, and should not have been approved. To proceed with the HRO creates a due process violation, and does not respect the legal rights of Dede Evavold.
The HRO was signed, and approved by Judge Karen Asphaug, who presided over all 4 trials of the co-defendants in the Grazzini-Rucki criminal case and has been described as being the “personal judge” of the applicant filing for the HRO, David Rucki.
Judge Asphaug has a history of covering up the violent and criminal history of applicant, Rucki – and this fraudulent HRO is just another example of that.
For example – During the criminal trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, Judge Asphaug suppressed any mention of Rucki’s violent and criminal history; when Sandra testified at her trial she wasn’t even allowed to allude to the restraining order she and her children received against him. During the same trial, Judge Asphaug suppressed the Rucki social service records documenting a history of abuse allegations the children raised against their father.
Further, Judge Asphaug ruled to disallow nearly all of Rucki’s criminal history and forced Gina Dahlen to testify in multiple trials even though she was a defendant still awaiting her trial. (Read More: Beware, the next blog post may be a threat to someone’s safety by Michael Volpe)
And now, shocking revelations from the largely redacted evidence that Dede Evavold received, as part of her case, reveal that Dakota County is issuing a probation violation against her, and threatening jail, when there is no proof to suggest that she did anything wrong..
“7/19/2017, Gilbertsen, John P: “I was able to locate a speicif article reference by the victim (David Rucki) and it did contain information and commentary on the victim(s), much what was negative and sensationalistic in nature. However, I was unable to determine who in fact runs the blog, as the postings are under Aliases which do not clearly identify the person posting…”
And,“When I reported back to Supervisor Griffin I indicated I did not feel there was information that we could glean that make it clear Ms. Evavold is the writer or runs the blog..”
Based on this evidence alone, ALL charges against Dede Evavold in this fraudulent HRO, and alleged probation violation, should be immediately dropped – there is no evidence of harassment, and no evidence that she is responsible for the posts in question.
So why is Judge Asphaug, and Dakota County pursuing this HRO against Evavold?
It is obvious that the purpose of this HRO is to suppress public scrutiny, and end all discussion on the Grazzini-Rucki family court and criminal cases. And the Chaos and horror after courts step in for Rucki family. Dede Evavold is being used as a scapegoat so that by threatening her with jail, fines, stripping her of Freedom of Speech and threatening other legal action sends a strong message to deter those supporting Sandra Grazzini-Rucki or Dede Evavold, or deter those speaking out about this case. This protects Judge Asphaug from being exposed for her actions during all 4 trials of the Grazzini-Rucki co-defendants, where she violated numerous laws, violated the Constitutional rights of all 4 defendants, demonstrated bias and acted with outrageous abuses of judicial power.
This fraudulent HRO is an abuse of the legal, and serves only to harass Dede Evavold – that the case would proceed this far shows just how lawless the courts in Dakota County really are.