Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

There can be no faith in government if our highest offices are excused from scrutiny~Edward Snowden

MN GOP State Convention 2018

Andy Gildea, husband of Lorie Gildea, Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, makes inflammatory comments about Republicans supporting judicial reform at the Republican State Convention in June.

Andy & Lorie Gildea-Image from

I get that we have different views of those closest to us, but I would think that publicly stated views of a judge’s politically active spouse has to have some connection to the fundamental thinking of that judge. To say that he is in “vociferous opposition” to the motion to reform the judiciary didn’t just come out of thin air!

Gildea quotes Judge Roy Bean, “Never reward crooks, liars, and drunks” and adds, “these changes are being advocated by the worst republicans you can imagine.”

Phantly Roy Bean, Jr. .jpg

Judge Roy Bean~Wikipedia

Andy may want to reconsider who he quotes.

Internet research indicates that Judge Roy Bean was really a big phony in Texas history and was only a legend in his own mind. He wasn’t even a judge, but a justice of the peace for Pecos County who presided over small legal offenses, acted as coroner and conducted marriages. Most offenders were simply fined and sent on their way. Judge Bean usually pocketed the fine instead of turning it over to the county.

Bean gained his scant legal experience on the other side of the law and by the time he was 50 years old was known as a murderer, duelist, rustler, gambler, thief, wife beater, smuggler and all around no-good drunk. Some people say it takes a crook to catch one, but Bean hardly caught anyone. Bean was mainly known for giving goofy legal opinions on subjects that he knew nothing about.

The moral of the story: When the Judiciary is resistant to transparency and accountability you have to wonder. . . “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear”. . .or do you????


Big Trouble at the O.K. Corral

Shocking: House Intel Committee Releases 165 Page Simpson FISA Testimony-Is Obama Going to Jail?

Simpson’s testimony about illegal FISA issued spy warrants on Candidate Trmp and his staff should send Deep State servants to prison including Obama.

For more stories like these, visit The Common Sense Show

Please donate to offset the costs of The Common Sense Show


House panel releases Glenn Simpson testimony transcript


Read More


Bundy trial dismissed due to ‘flagrant prosecutorial misconduct’



Ralph Romano This is the Obama Government, and they can retry you 100,000 times until they get the result that they want. It’s so INSANE and brutally unfair. The BLM as exhausted the 3 try ruling. So lets see if they try again to violate MORE of their rights. The judge sent them home because she wanted some PITY for herself, to pretend she is fair. She is another NWO shill for the communist rule in America.
Debby Benkert

Debby Benkert SHould have been DISMISSED with PREJUDICE so that it could NOT be brought back to court.. SO.. what next?? willfully withheld information.. that alone means it should have been dismissed..

Today our prayers were heard and the current trial against my husband, sons and other defendants was declared a mistrial. We wanted a dismissal but are grateful that the truth is getting out. We are a step closer to freedom.

Although the case is not over and there will continue to be lots of legal back and forth I needed to thank you, on behalf of our entire family for your prayers and support.

You stood with my family when it would have been easier to look the other way. Yo

See More

Image may contain: 3 people, people smiling, people standing and outdoor
Barb Berg
Barb Berg I don’t see a mistrial as a victory. Cliven still sits in jail, the rest are still on conditional release & the government basically just got away with violating the people’s rights once again!! And now the tax payers get screwed all in the name of INJUSTICE!! Plus it seemed to me there were some good jurors in that jury, they were asking the right questions! No it should have been dismissed with prejudice
John Raynor
John Raynor Americans have the Constitutional right to oppose and take a stand against tyranny. Why did our Government arrest and imprison these people? Why was LaVoy Finicum Ambushed and Murdered???? RIP LaVoy. You are not forgotten in our Christmas celebrations.Idaho.


Breaking News: Mistrial Declared in Cliven Bundy Proceedings

Let’s hope the MN Supreme Court reverses the decisions in our cases due to the willful withholding and suppression of evidence that would have definitely exonerated us. We’re crossing our fingers!





Looming Reckoning

Bill Clinton admitting secret government experiments on ...

Bill Clinton

‘What About Bill?’ Sexual Misconduct Debate Revives Questions About Clinton

The New York Times logo

Former President Bill Clinton last month in Baltimore. Some of his behavior while he was in office has been an uncomfortable subject for Democrats.

The New York Times  By PETER BAKER

WASHINGTON — Another woman went on national television this week to press her case of sexual assault by a powerful figure. But the accused was not Roy S. Moore or Harvey Weinstein or Donald J. Trump. It was Bill Clinton.

“I feel like people are starting to believe and realize that I was truly sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton,” Juanita Broaddrick said on Fox News nearly two decades after first going public with her story. “All victims matter. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Democrat or a Republican. Who cares if you’re straight or you’re gay, or if you believe in God or not. We all have a right to be believed.”

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

The cultural conversation about women, power and sexual misconduct that has consumed the United States in recent weeks has now raised a question that is eagerly promoted by those on the political right just as it discomfits those on the political left: What about Bill? While Fox News and other conservative outlets revive years-old charges against Mr. Clinton to accuse Mr. Moore’s critics of hypocrisy, some liberals say it may be time to rethink their defense of the 42nd president.

Matthew Yglesias, a liberal blogger who once worked at the Center for American Progress, a pillar of the Clinton political world, wrote on on Wednesday that “I think we got it wrong” by defending Mr. Clinton in the 1990s and that he should have resigned. Chris Hayes, the liberal MSNBC host, said on Twitter that “Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.”

Continue Reading:


Details on Bill Clinton’s ride on pedophile’s ‘Lolita Express’ sought

MSM Wants To Obliterate Bill Clinton Sex Predator Narrative

Bill Clinton’s looming reckoning as a sexual predator


Former Prosecutor Turned Judge-Jailed for Failure to Disclose Evidence

Image courtesy of suphakit73 at

For the First Time Ever, a Prosecutor Will Go to Jail for Wrongfully Convicting an Innocent Man

%d bloggers like this: