Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

The Political Power Struggle

Image result for civil warThe progressive left has been radicalized and is pushing their violent rhetoric to new levels. Pushing the agenda of division will ultimately create a civil war!

THE CIVIL WAR IS HERE  The left doesn’t want to secede. It wants to rule.

Listen to AM 950’s “Progressive Voice of Minnesota” Matt McNeil rant about the Philando Castile shooting 


More race baiting titles/stories below:

Jury finds Minnesota cop not guilty in shooting of black motorist Philando Castile

Philando Castile’s Murder Proves There’s Nothing Blacks Can Do

Philando Castile shooting: Black gun owners worried by acquittal in officer-involved shooting

Cop Acquitted in Shooting Death of Black Minnesota Motorist

Even the black jurors in the Philando Castile case were in favor of acquitting cop


This article addresses the fact that no one is talking about:

Officer Jeronimo Yanez at Law Enforcement Memorial

2014 Annual Report · Police Department · Lauderdale, Minnesota

Chinese” Minneapolis Cop Who Killed Philando Castile Identified as Jeronimo Yanez “ saboteur365

If liberals were wishing for the vicious KKK racist killer of black man Philando Castile to be white, they didn’t get their wish.

His name is Jeronimo Yanez.

The last name Yanez is a common Mexican last name. The first name Jeronimo is also familiar to those who have contact with Mestizos.

Jeronimo could be Mexican, Indian, or Filipino, but he sure isn’t white.

Thus, cop haters are going to have to measure their hatred of cops against their love of the darker races. They were hoping that Philando’s shooter was white in order to confirm their own self-loathing and hatred of working class whites.

They will rejoice at one thing. Philando’s killing has been ruled a homicide, which will surely mean that Jeronimo will face murder charges. It doesn’t help Jeronimo in the court of public opinion that Minnesota’s wealthy governor Mark Dayton has arrogantly declared that race had something to do with Philando’s shooting. Dayton constantly sides with black lives matter. He’s a real bastard, that one.

Continue Reading: https://saboteur365.wordpress.com/2016/07/08/chinese-minneapolis-cop-who-killed-philando-castile-identified-as-jeronimo-yanez/comment-page-1/


Image result for race baitingExcerpt from Identity Politics Are Ripping Us Apart

“We’ve always had a race problem in this country, but to deny our progress on this front is to deny reality. That progress, however, is not inevitable, and this political generation — in its mindless rage and commitment to identity politics — threatens to undo the work of generations before. When one side screams that white is wrong, another side will scream that white is right, and the concept of an actual “racial conversation” — much less the notion of “racial healing” — will be little more than a sad joke.

I don’t see the problem as primarily political. Instead, our nation is undoing its progress on race issues more in the academy, on social media, and in Hollywood than it is in the halls of power. Politicians are responding to culture, not driving culture, and we’re driving our nation apart piece by piece, from Facebook to 4chan. The day when a critical mass of our nation can’t truly say — and mean — “all lives matter” is the day we’re truly lost.”

— David French is an attorney and a staff writer at National Review.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435567/identity-politics-race-are-ripping-us-apart

EXCLUSIVE: ALEX JONES CHALLENGES NBC!

Alex Jones is challenging MSNBC and Megyn Kelly to release the full unedited version of their interview

Alex Jones is challenging MSNBC and Megyn Kelly to release the full unedited version of their interview with Alex Jones otherwise he will release it himself.

MSNBC recently published a heavily edited preview indicating their version of the interview will be used as a hit piece to vilify Alex Jones.

Having anticipated this move, Infowars recorded their own copy of the interview as a safeguard whereby, once again, the MSM could be exposed as fake news.

ALEX JONES LEAKS MEGYN KELLY’S INTERVIEW PITCH: ‘IT’S NOT GONNA BE SOME GOTCHA HIT PIECE, I PROMISE’

The video puts Kelly in a precarious position

Alex Jones Leaks Megyn Kelly’s Interview Pitch: ‘It’s Not Gonna Be Some Gotcha Hit Piece, I Promise’

Alex Jones leaked the audio of a phone conversation Thursday night revealing Megyn Kelly promising him a fair, non-“gotcha” interview as she invited him to appear on her new NBC News program.

“I don’t double cross,” Kelly tells Jones, repeatedly assuring him that her interview would not dwell on “conspiracy theories” or familiar left-wing attacks against the independent broadcast host. Rather, Kelly says that the focus of the news profile would be to humanize Jones and explore his personal life.

Jones himself appears in the video, revealing the private phone conversation on his website InfoWars in advance of Kelly’s Sunday broadcast. He annotates the audio clips with his own commentary, NBC’s preview snippet of the now-filmed interview, and news clips about the ensuing uproar — where a besieged Kelly has denounced Jones’ coverage of the 2012 Sandy Hook mass shooting as “revolting.”

The video puts Kelly in a precarious position. As her fledgling weekend news magazine show fights for viability, left-wing agitators have attacked her for interviewing Jones. A boycott sprang up before the broadcast ever aired, pressuring sponsors and reportedly convincing major brands to pull their advertisements. In response, she gave a statement contradicting nearly everything she promised in this phone call.

“The very question that prompted this interview,” she claimed, is: “How does Jones, who traffics in these outrageous conspiracy theories, have the respect of the president of the United States and a growing audience of millions?” However, Jones has revealed, her pitch was the exact opposite: “I promise you that’s not what this will be [a hit piece],” she says. “It really will be about, who is this guy?” Later on, she expresses her hope that some liberal viewers would come out of the segment saying, “I see the guy who loves those kids and who is more complex than I’ve been led to believe.”

So, which statement is true? That conclusion is not as easy as one would assume. Kelly now finds herself in the unenviable position of appeasing corporate sponsors spooked by left-wing outrage while also trying to establish herself as a trustworthy interviewer.bShe has nothing to lose if Alex Jones feels betrayed and never talks to her again, but she does express fear during their conversation that if he calls her out for a “hit piece,” she will have trouble getting any more controversial, ratings-draw subjects to appear on her show. And, based on the preview clips, Kelly will have to square that broken promise with this fervent declaration about her character:

She has nothing to lose if Alex Jones feels betrayed and never talks to her again, but she does express fear during their conversation that if he calls her out for a “hit piece,” she will have trouble getting any more controversial, ratings-draw subjects to appear on her show. And, based on the preview clips, Kelly will have to square that broken promise with this fervent declaration about her character:

All I can do is give you my word and tell you — if there’s one thing about me, I do what I say I’m gonna do. And I — I don’t double cross, so I promise you when it’s over you’ll say, “Absolutely. She did what she said she was gonna do.”

Jones states that he has only released “a few clips” of his full phone conversation with Kelly and that InfoWars taped the entire NBC interview “so that we can document post-mortem how she edited, how she manipulated.” He concludes: “It shows the arrogance of Megyn Kelly that she didn’t think we’d record her to document what she really said and did.”

Read selected transcripts of the Alex Jones-Megyn Kelly phone conversation below:

KELLY: It’s sort of a good opportunity just for long-form storytelling. You know, it’s like — it’s not like the three-minute interview, it’s like the in-depth profiles of people. And at the top of my list was you.

JONES: So it’s like an investigative report into “fake news”?

KELLY: No. No, what we’re doing?

JONES: Yeah. Come on.

KELLY: No no no. Hell no. The reason you — I mean, I know you guys, you know, [inaudible] — The reason you are interesting to me is because I followed your custody case. And I think you had a very good point about the way the media was covering it and for some reason treated you and your family and what was going on as fair game when they never would have done that to, if you will, a mainstream media figure. And I saw a different side of you in that whole thing and I just — here, you know, you became very fascinating to me. I just sort of thought you were this maybe, you know, one-dimensional guy — like, this is your thing — and the comments I heard from you during the course of that trial and your plea to the media to be respectful of you and your kids just reminded me that you’re just like anybody. You’re a dad, you go through the same things we go through, and I thought, “now, that would be an interesting story to tell.”

JONES: Wouldn’t the argument be, then, in the show, ’cause I’ve seen that as a standard Democrat talking point — I’m not saying that’s what you’re doing — “Well, he asked for privacy in his family, but he didn’t do that for Sandy Hook and he didn’t do that for the pizzeria.”

KELLY: No, I mean, I can ask you about that, you know, but this is not gonna be a contentious, you know, sort of “gotcha” exchange. I — That’s not what this show is and that’s really not what I want to do. I want to do in-depth profiles on people, just interesting people. So I can ask you that — “this is what the critics say” — but this isn’t gonna be a “A-ha! Let’s play a clip.”

JONES: I don’t mind questions. What I don’t like is, did you know or did your producers do that you, where I said Hillary Clinton personally — and it was tongue-in-cheek so I could get the satire out. You guys, took it out of context, but — did personally kill kids by the Iraq war and Syria war or the Libya situation, and you guys cut the back off of that  — it was in the same 30 seconds, where I said I’m not talking about the pizza place, I’m talking about in the Middle East.

KELLY: No, this is completely unfamiliar to me.

JONES: Remember you had James Alefantis on Fox News, you’re talking about fake news.

KELLY: The guy from Comet Pizza?

JONES: Yes, and then you played a clip of me saying Hillary personally kills children.

KELLY: I, forgive me, Alex, but I don’t remember the clip. I remember him [pause] and, you know, the nature of that exchange, which I think is the only time I’ve ever said — um, [inaudible] anything.

[In that Fox News segment, Kelly says to Alefantis: “And someone could have been killed inside of your restaurant for no good reason other than people like Alex Jones fanned a conspiracy theory that even the DC police say has no basis in fact.”]

JONES: Sure, sure, sure. I mean, all I’m saying is, I can send you the Right Wing Watch clip where first reported it, and they said, “Jones tongue-in-cheek,” you know, “said that Hillary killed all these kids but then said it in Syria and Libya.” So, I mean I’m just telling you, that’s the kind of stuff that scares me, because I can stand for what I’ve said, and I can even say, yeah I probably shouldn’t [crosstalk] Sure, sure.

KELLY: Listen, I’ll take a look at that. That’s very unfamiliar to me. All I can tell you is that I bend over backwards to make sure that doesn’t happen.

KELLY: I’m sort of — you know, for lack of a better term, I’m trying to create a different kind of program. And it’s fine. You know, I’ll ask you about some of the controversies, of course. And you’ll say whatever you want to say. But it’s not going to be some gotcha hit piece, I promise you that. I — it doesn’t do me any good. If I do that to you, then you go out there and you say, “She did a hit piece on me. This is what she said, and this is what she did.” And then the next time I want to get somebody, they’re gonna say, “Look what you did to Alex Jones,” you know. “Screw you.” So I promise you that’s not what this will be. It really will be about, who is this guy? And we’ll talk about some of the controversy, and I’ll ask you, and you can respond, and we’ll get into the whole, you know, what you’ve been through this past year. And my goal is for your listeners and the left, you know, who will be watching some on NBC, to say, “Wow, that was really interesting.”

[Note: At this point, the audio quality of Kelly’s phone call abruptly changes —

All I can do is give you my word and tell you — if there’s one thing about me, I do what I say I’m gonna do. And I — I don’t double cross, so I promise you when it’s over you’ll say, “Absolutely. She did what she said she was gonna do.” And you’ll be fine with it. I’m not looking to portray you as some boogeyman or, you know, do any sort of a gotcha moment. I just want to talk about you. I want people to get to know you. And the craziest thing of all would be if some of the people who have this insane version of you in their heads walk away saying, “You know what? I see, like, the dad in him. I see the guy who loves those kids and who is more complex than I’ve been led to believe.”

JONES: Sure, but just so you know,  like, on all the Sandy Hook things, I’ve had debates where I’ve shown both sides where I go back and forth, but I believe people died there. And then they never show me really saying that, over the years, you know, you can look where the people that think nobody died are the ones all that hate me on the other side of it. And so what I’m saying is, people take clips out of context — and I know I’ve done a lot of stuff, some of which I’m not proud of. So if people want to do a real piece or something, I mean, obviously, I don’t want to sit here and, like, dodge all these interviews. Like, I told — they wanted me to tape something for Charlie Rose’s show, they wanted me to tape something for The View. I’m not saying, oh, I’m such a big, you know, famous guy, it’s just that —

KELLY: No no, I understand.

JONES: These taping things really just lends itself to be, you know, to ask yourself to be run over. But I understand, obviously, this is a magazine show, so it’s highly produced.

KELLY: It’s like a whole new world over there [at NBC]. They deeply care about this kind of thing [fact checking]. And it’s not that we didn’t care on cable, it’s just a different game on cable. You know, you move faster, and it’s more real time and, you know, that’s just the fact that more mistakes get made. But I will promise you to personally look at any clips we want to use of you and have a producer run by you whether we are taking it in context and what you are saying about —

JONES: Well, I say some pretty wild stuff, and I’ll admit to a lot of it’s satire, but also, I’m not trying to be, I’m not being fake about what I’m saying.

JONES: So this is like a reboot, relaunch for you — that you’re not the, you know, right-wing or left-wing pundit from Fox. You’re an investigative journalist that does magazine, you know, investigations, or —

KELLY: Exactly. So it’s like an entirely different set of muscles. And trust me when I tell you, my goal is not to go out there and be like, “Oh my god, if I sit with her, she’s gonna kill me!” Like — but of course I’m gonna do a fair interview. I’m still me! You know, I’m not gonna go out there and be Barbara Walters. You know. You just trust me. It’s — I will ask you about the controversies. I will ask you in a non — you know, I’ll be fair about it. I’ll give you the chance to respond. And I really just want to talk about you, you know. You.

KELLY: I have not enjoyed being, in any way, on the pointy end of the political spear, you know. It was never anything I wanted to do. And so it’s not — you know, I would say that I’m a combination of Mike Wallace, Oprah Winfrey, and Larry the Cable Guy.

JONES: [Laughter] I know the Larry the Cable Guy. He’s a good guy.

KELLY: I love him! And, so, like, that’s what you’ll get in the interview. [Laughter] That’s — that’s what you’ll get in the interview. [Laughter] Get, you know, a little bit of all three of those. And hopefully, everybody will walk away feeling like they had a good dinner. You know, nutritious, some red meat, with some dessert at the end.

MEDIA BLACKOUT

BREAKING: DNC Lawsuit Attorney’s Want Protect For Witnesses, Cite Seth Rich

Published on Jun 17, 2017

In a major development, again ignored by the mainstream news, the lawsuit against the DNC took another interesting turn as the attorney requested the judge provide witness protection, citing Seth Rich.

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show


The DNC’s New Hillary Clinton and She’s Got the Trail of Bodies to Prove It

CSS-Offical-New-Logo2

wasserman 1

Hillary’s health may be in severe decline. However, she has a successor and her name is Debbie Wasserman Schultz. This woman strikes terror in the hearts of those who would oppose her. With the unfolding of the Clinton emails, the Podesta connection, the Seth Rich murder, etc., this woman is headed for stardom as a Democrat, unless this new version of Hillary Clinton can be stopped.

Deborah Wasserman Schultz is the U.S. Representative for Florida’s 23rd congressional district. She is a member of the Democratic Party and was a former chairperson for the Democratic National

Wasserman Schultz Connections to the Seth Rich Murder

After the readers listen to the following account of Wasserman Schultz’s complicity in the Seth Rich Murder, a whole new paradigm will be created for the Democratic party.

The Murder of a Federal Prosecutor In Wasserman Schultz’s District

The federal prosecutor was murdered in Wasserman Schultz’s district and would you care to speculate what he was investigating?

federal prosecutor 3

Another Set Rich murder? Only this time the victim is a federal prosecutor.

The mainstream media is really getting out in front of the story regarding a federal prosecutor who was looking into DNC voter fraud and possible Florida connections to the murder of Seth Rich.

In their search engine, Google has listed this story under all MSM major publications.

  1. The NYT
  2. The Washington Post
  3. The Miami Herald
  4. ABC News
  5. Politico

This is called controlling the narrative. What narrative? Hollywood police spokeswoman Miranda Grossman said Thursday that the body of 37-year-old Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. was found early Wednesday by a passerby on the city’s beach. She said detectives are trying to determine if the death was a homicide, suicide or something else.

Homicide or suicide?  The man’s skull was crushed. There are many stunning facts connected to this case which are discussed in the following video.

Smoking Gun: Wasserman Schultz’s Federal DA for DC Blocks Further Investigation Into Seth Rich Murder

 

wasserman

 

In an amazing conflict of interest, Steve Wasserman a Federal District Attorney for DC has shut down the Seth Rich murder investigation.

This represents the real obstruction of justice allegation.

Fearful Democrats File for Order of Protection Against Wasserman Schultz

AS I pointed out in Part One, Wasserman Schultz is being sued for perpetrating voter fraud. However, the litigants fear Wasserman Schultz.

Given the Set Rich Murder and the distinct trail of bodies that are following Wasserman Schultz, is it any wonder that the litigants against Wasserman Schultz are fearful for their lives. They have filed for and were denied an order of protection against the new version of Hillary Clinton, Wasserman Schultz.

June 13, 2017 57 57 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing
June 13, 2017 57 57-1 Exhibit 1 to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing
June 13, 2017 57 57-2 Exhibit 2 to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing (SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL)
June 13, 2017 57 57-3 Composite Exhibit 3 to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing (SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL)
June 13, 2017 57 57-4 Composite Exhibit 4 to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing (SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL)
June 13, 2017 57 57-5 Exhibit 5 to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing
June 14, 2017 58 58 Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing
June 15, 2017 60 60 Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing

Please Donate to The Common Sense Show

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL AND DON’T FORGET TO “LIKE” US

Supporting Pedophilia

The UN Is Normalizing Pedophilia: The Deep State Is Free to Prey Upon Your Children

CSS-Offical-New-Logo2

child-sex

The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights is sanctioning a sexual revolution that will culminate in the legalization and whole-hearted support of transgenderism but will also support the legalization of pedophilia. As the Deep State is further exposed for their role in Pedogate, we can expect more counterattacks such as the legalization of pedophilia.

From The New American:

“The United Nations “Human Rights Council,” which counts some of the world’s most ruthless dictatorships as members, sparked global outrage last week by voting to appoint a UN czar to oversee the normalization of homosexuality and transgenderism around the world.

…According to the UN’s propaganda service, the discredited UN “Human Rights Council” debated the measure for almost four hours on June 30 before adopting the scheme in a contentious vote. Just 23 member governments and regimes voted in favor of creating the new czar, while 18 voted against and six abstained. The measure was pushed forward by a tight-knit network of communist and socialist governments in Latin America with close ties to Marxist terrorist groups, Western globalists, Moscow, and Beijing. A number of European governments and other members of the “LGBT Core Group,” which includes Obama and the EU, also played a key role in pushing the scheme from outside the UN “human rights” outfit.“For the first time, work on this issue [normalizing homosexuality and transgenderism] will be effectively institutionalized at the Human Rights Council,” the UN said….”

…”celebrated as a “great step forward for human rights in the United States.” “The measures he advocated here — including new laws to protect people from discrimination — are the same measures that, today, we advocate to governments everywhere.” Ironically, the praise for the child rapist came even as the UN’s “peace” armies were facing global outrage for systematically raping and sexually exploiting children around the world.

Years ago, I wrote about the fact that NAMBLA was advocating for the legalization of pedophilia. Care to guess who their largest contributor is? Look at the following:

The following is an example of how academics talk about pedophilia. Soon, the practice, much like transgenders terrorizing girls in female restrooms has become the norm.

“Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.

The most heinous organization in America.

The most heinous organization in America.The most heinous organization in America is Nambla. Nambla is short for the North American Man-Boy Association and their identifying banner statement is “sex before 8 or it is too late”.

We are on our way in the country to allowing and even encouraging sex with children. The last taboo is being eliminated.

It is now tolerated that creatures with an XY chromosome structure can now enter little girls restrooms, under the guise of being a transgender and terrorize these girls George Soros style. Your childre are about to become part of a world that they are not equipped to live in.

How long will it be until employees who have sex with children is protected as well when we look at the transgender issue in bathrooms. No, this is not hyperbole, it is a legitimate concern. The North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) begins to figure prominently into this picture. In the past, one of their trademark phrases was “sex before eight, or it’s too late”. This is an obvious attempt to remove the last perverted prohibition from our legal code as well as our societal safeguards to protect our children. Words cannot describe how sick and perverted these people truly are. And before you think that this could never become a reality, please consider that globalist, George Soros, gives money to NAMBLA. If that is not concerning enough for you please realize that Kevin Jennings, an Obama Department of Education official, and a close friend of Hillary Clinton has involvement with this group as well.

Could the last taboo be permanently removed?“Could the last taboo be permanently removed? You mean I no longer have to hide the fact that I am a pedophile?”

Bootstrapping gender neutral and homosexual protection issues to pedophilia is already happening. The New York Times is on record saying the pedophilia is not a crime. The ACLU is actively defending Nambla and pedophile advocates.

YOUR CHILDREN AT RISK- THE NORMALIZATION OF PEDOPHILIA

Please Donate to The Common Sense Show

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL AND DON’T FORGET TO “LIKE” US

This is the absolute best in food storage. Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer.  Listeners to The Common Sense Show will receive 5% off their next order by mentioning “Hodgesnov5” in the coupon code box.  Don’t wait until it is too late. Click Here  for more information.

   

Mainstream Media Inspired Terror Attack

LEFTIST GUNMAN SHOOTS REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN IN MEDIA-INSPIRED TERROR ATTACK

Attacker deliberately targeted Republicans

Continue reading

THIS IS NOT ABOUT SAVING THE EARTH!

LEONARDO ‘PRIVATE JET’ DICAPRIO BASHES TRUMP OVER PARIS CLIMATE PULLOUT

The man who once flew 8,000 miles to pick up an “environmental award” is not happy

Leonardo DiCaprio waving

Leonardo DiCaprio – the man who once flew 8,000 miles on a private jet to pick up an “environmental award,” is bashing Donald Trump over his decision to pull the U.S. out of the Paris climate accord.

Yes, really.

Shortly after Trump made his announcement in the Rose Garden yesterday, DiCaprio tweeted, “Today, our planet suffered. It’s more important than ever to take action. #ParisAgreement.”

It’s unlikely that DiCaprio himself will be taking any action if that means curbing his own carbon-belching luxury celebrity lifestyle.

Last year, the Oscar winner took a round trip of 8,000 miles on a private jet from Cannes to New York and back again to collect an honor from a clean-water advocacy group.

After flying on another private jet to attend the soccer World Cup in Brazil in 2014, DiCaprio stayed on a 470-foot yacht owned by oil billionaire Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The yacht uses fuel equal to 83 American household’s annual worth of CO2 emissions.

After being entertained by the oil billionaire, DiCaprio attended a People’s Climate March in New York where he protested against – you guessed it – the oil industry.

During his Oscar winning speech, DiCaprio decried global warming as “the most urgent threat facing our entire species”.

This was after the actor had taken no less than six private jet trips from New York to LA in the space of six weeks.

He also took a private jet from L.A. to Las Vegas and stayed in Vegas for just eight hours to attend a party before flying all the way back again.

Leo was so worried about global warming that just months after his Oscar speech, he got his celebrity friends to fly 6,000 miles from LA to St Tropez so they could listen to his speech on, you guessed it, global warming.

And I’m not done.

Leo’s 2000 movie The Beach was made at the cost of a precious eco-system in Thailand being completely ruined.

As part of his environmental activist re-brand, DiCaprio also complains about over-fishing, a passion that didn’t prevent him from serving his guests whole sea bass, having flown them all in on CO2 belching helicopters, at an event where a film was screened about – you guessed it – over-fishing.

DiCaprio has even been lambasted by environmentalists like Robert Rapier, who accused the actor of living a lifestyle that, “diminishes his moral authority to lecture others on reducing their own carbon emissions.”

Really? Ya think?

DiCaprio represents everything that’s wrong with today’s virtue signaling Hollywood elite.

They lecture ordinary Americans about their lifestyle to earn entertainment industry brownie points, while living extravagant, luxury, carbon-spewing lifestyles themselves.


MN has been very involved in pushing this climate monarchy to impose draconian restrictions on its residents. After Trump withdrew from the agreement, MN announced that they will proceed with their own climate change strategy. That’s so shocking!

Star TribuneInstead of following the lead of the federal government, Minnesota will look to local communities to tackle climate change, state officials said.
With a plan adopted in 2007, the state has been a national leader in pursuing an aggressive plan to reduce emissions of the chemicals that cause climate change.
STARTRIBUNE.COM
Related Articles Below

The 2016 Climate Adaptation Conference: Transforming Awareness into Action, was held January 28, at the Minneapolis DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel. Over 250 participants attended the conference which through panel discussions and breakout sessions, explored a variety of critical issues affected by climate change, such as water quantity and quality, energy grid resiliency, impacts on tribal communities and effective communication strategies.

The day opened with presentations by panelists representing Minnesota corporations 3M, General Mills and Best Buy. Climate change can potentially cause disruption in production of goods and these companies are creating and implementing strategies to both overcome the challenges of a changing climate and reduce their corporate carbon footprint.

Continue Reading: https://www.wrc.umn.edu/publications/minnegram/minnegram-spring-2016/climate-overview

Coleman and other Mississippi River mayors to attend Paris climate conference

Seven mayors from national cities along the Mississippi River — including St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman and St. Cloud Mayor Dave Kleis — will attend the December U.N. conference on climate change in Paris.

Coleman said of the conference:

The Mississippi mayors have direct experience with climate disruption, surviving floods, droughts, and hurricanes. That’s why we must be part of the global discussion on climate change. Together, we will be a voice for the Mississippi and other river basins at the U.N. meeting this fall and beyond to help secure the world’s food supply.

Continue Reading: https://www.minnpost.com/political-agenda/2015/09/coleman-and-other-mississippi-river-mayors-attend-paris-climate-conference


Image result for New American logo

I had the honor of attending one of Tom DeWeese’s speaking events on climate change and the unelected government in Minneapolis in 2015. He has written an excellent article that connects the dots on this scam that is robbing us of our freedoms. Excerpts below:

The Principles of Freedom vs. Agenda 21 

Written by 

Global Warming/Climate Change. It has been so discredited in the true scientific community that proponents have become almost silly in their continued attempts to push it. So, why don’t they stop? Why is it so vitally important that they continue to promote something that clearly is unproven, to say the least?

It’s because all of Agenda 21 policy is built on the premise that man is destroying the Earth. Climate Change is their “Proof.” To eliminate that premise is to remove all credibility and purpose for their entire agenda. They are willing to go to any length, even lies, to keep the climate change foot on our throats.

But don’t take my word for it. I’ll let them speak for themselves:

Christine Stewart (Former Canadian Minister of the Environment) said:
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” 

Timothy Wirth (President, UN Foundation) and former official of the Clinton Administration said,
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”

Paul Watson (Co-Founder of Green Peace) said,
“It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true.”

Cheap Energy is the enemy of the Earth. To the average person, the drive to stop any ability to obtain cheap energy makes no sense. People are hurting economically. Jobs are lost. Energy costs are skyrocketing. Any attempt to drill oil, fracking of shale gas, and mining coal are all vigorously blocked by government and green policy. Yet the government spends billions of dollars on “alternative energy” such as wind and solar, which provides less than 3% of our energy needs. Why? What is the motivation to put such shackles on the US economic engine?

The excuse is that energy use drives up CO2 emissions and accelerates global warming – the excuse necessary to “harmonize” the US into the socialist, Sustainable global noose.

But, according to some anti-energy advocates, the fear of cheap energy goes beyond environmental protection. Energy availability, they say, helps build wealth for individuals and removes them from the rolls of the dependent. And you see, dependency on government is a little- mentioned, but major goal of sustainable policy.

Prof. Paul Ehrlich (Professor of Population Studies, Stanford University)said: “Giving society cheap, abundant energy is the worst thing that could ever happen to the planet.”

Amory Lovins (Rocky Mountain Institute), said:
“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.”

Jeremy Rifkin (Greenhouse Crisis Foundation),
“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”

There is a great uprising beginning to take place around the world. The Internet has become an incredible tool to spread the word of freedom. And oppressed people are reading our founding documents and dreaming of freedom for themselves.

Truth is on our side. Right is on our side. And I believe time is on our side. Call me Pollyanna if you will, but I see signs of change. The immigration battle; the battle against Obamacare; the entire Tea Party movement – all show that people are alert. The sleeping giant is awakening.

The truth is, in our lifetime we are probably not going to see America become what we might envision to be the perfect world. Frankly, many of us would disagree among ourselves about what that perfect world should be.

But, in the face of the forces of tyranny which we now fight every day, if we can preserve our nation’s sovereignty and independence and keep the Bill of Rights alive – a document based on the three principles of freedom – then frankly that will be an incredible victory.

And for our children and grandchildren to have a hope of living in Freedom – that will be enough.

Click to read article in its entirety:
https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/18102-the-principles-of-freedom-vs-agenda-21

Secret Federal Grand Jury

Source, with links and images:

What Does It Mean.Com

Most Secret Grand Jury In American History Paralyzes Washington With Fear

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An intriguing Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the most secret Federal Grand Jury ever empanelled in American history has paralyzed Washington D.C. with fear after its swiftly moving this past Friday (19 April) to claim its first Hillary Clinton victim just hours before President Donald Trump left the United States on his historic trip to Saudi Arabia.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report, Federal Grand Juries in America have a maximum of 23 members, 16 of whom must be present to form a quorum, and indictments are returned by a vote of 12 or more members whose “information/evidence” presented to them is done by what are called United States Attorneys, who are that nations chief criminal and civil law prosecutors—all of whom are supposed to believe that no one is above the law.

Being led by Joon H. Kim, the acting US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, this report continues, the secrecy of this Federal Grand Jury was so complete it was able to indict, achieve the arrest of, and conviction, of a top Hillary Clinton surrogate and former US Congressman named Anthony Weiner in less than 24 hours with no leaking to the US mainstream propaganda media—and was so rapidly accomplished, Weiner’s wife, and Hillary Clinton’s top aid, Huma Abedin didn’t even know what was occurring, and who hours after Weiner pled guilty, filed for divorce against him.

Having agreed to a plea deal where he agreed not appeal his up to 2-year US Federal prison sentence for the crime of “sexting” with a 15-year-old girl child, and his further agreeing to be listed as a sexual offender for the rest of his life, this report details, the unprecedented speed of Anthony Weiner’s demise this past Friday showed his being arrested, appearing in US Federal Court, pleading guilty to his crimes, and then released on bail until his final September (2017) sentencing, all occurred in the span of 2 hours.

As to the incredible secrecy and speed in which Anthony Weiner was processed by President Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ), this report explains, is believed to be due to his becoming a witness to Hillary Clinton crimes and before he could be suicided or killed, and as evidenced by US Attorney Joon Kim only asking for a 21-27 prison sentenced, as opposed to the 10-year sentence Weiner was facing.

Anthony Weiner accepts plea deal in US Federal Court on 19 May 2017

Aiding US Attorney Joon Kim in the unprecedented rapid arrest, prosecution and conviction of Anthony Weiner, this report further details, was William F. Sweeney Jr. who is the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and who prior to his present posting was the Special Agent In Charge of Philadelphia—that is the location the SVR had previously indentified (on 13 May) had been put on alert to prepare for at least 23 “high security political defendants” being placed in the Federal Detention Center (FDC) located in that city.

Important to note about FBI Assistant Director William Sweeny Jr., this report says, was that in late 2015 he was preparing to present evidence before a Federal Grand Jury proving that both Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, were “integral parts” and the “main beneficiaries” of a massive “green energy” ponzi scheme that funneled millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation money laundering organization using a scheme concocted by their close friend and associate Troy Wragg.

Troy Wragg (center/circled) next to former President Bill Clinton at the annual meeting on the Clinton Global Initiative in New York on 25 September 2009

In late 2015, this report continues, FBI Agent In Charge William Sweeny Jr. was refused by then FBI Director James Comey to further investigate the Clinton’s as a few months prior to Troy Wragg and his criminal associates being indicted, Hillary Clinton had announced she was running to be US president—and that Comey said he wasn’t going to have the FBI interfere with.

To “placate/subdue” FBI Agent In Charge William Sweeny Jr. after he had stopped his criminal investigation into the Clinton’s, this report continues, last July (2016) FBI Director Comey elevated him to be the Assistant Director In Charge of the New York Field Office—but shortly after President Trump was sworn into office, Sweeny Jr. approached then US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara to reopen the Clinton investigation—which Bharara refused to do and led to Trump firing him on 11 March.

With Bharara now gone, this report says, President Trump elevated Joon H. Kim to be the acting US Attorney and work with Sweeny Jr. on the Clinton investigation, and whose first targets for prosecution were Anthony Weiner and his wife Huma Abedin—but that FBI Director Comey attempted to derail on 3 May when he testified before the US Congress that Abedin was not criminally charged even though she sent classified emails to her husband—and that led President Trump to firing him 6 days later on 9 May.

Central to FBI Director Comey’s protection scheme to keep the Clinton’s and their criminal associates from being prosecuted, this report explains, was his bizarre legal theory that “intent” first had to be established before anyone could be prosecuted—but who was directly opposed by now acting US Attorney Joon H. Kim who in prosecuting some of America’s most notorious mafia and Asian gangs stated that “intent” didn’t matter in criminal prosecutions, only if a crime had been committed.

Important to note about Joon H. Kim too, this report details, is that he is well known in the Kremlin for his work on behalf of Russia when he was a top lawyer for the international law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton—and though based in New York City, this organization of some of the top attorneys in the world has been named 8 times as the “Russian Law Firm of the Year—most especially when Kim and his international arbitration legal team successfully protected the Federation (between 2010-2013) from a French lawsuit seeking damages for unpaid bonds issued over 100 years ago.

To how Joon H. Kim was picked by President Trump to lead the prosecution of the Clinton’s and their criminal associates, this report further notes, was accomplished through negotiations between Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton managing partner Michael A. Gerstenzang and one of his most powerful clients named Henry Kravis—who as a co-founder of the American multinational private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) was interviewed by President Trump to be his US Secretary of the Treasury.

With some quarters in America praising President Trump’s actions in keeping criminals such as the Clinton’s from taking over the presidency, this report concludes, this nations mainstream “fake news” propaganda media, nevertheless, continues trying to hide the Clinton’s assassination murder of Seth Rich for his leaking tens-of-thousands of Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton emails to Wikileaks—and that led Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to compare the US media to those of Soviet communist times by his stating:

I sometimes get the impression that many U.S. media outlets work according to a principle which was common in the Soviet Union. Back then, people used to joke that the newspaper Pravda [Truth] had no truth in it, and the Izvestia [News] paper has no news in it. I get the impression that many U.S. media operate in the same way.”

%d bloggers like this: