Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

Paycheck and Pension

Longtime Stearns judge Landwehr to retire in September


Retirement in the judicial branch is really not retirement. There are currently 91 “retired” judges in MN that are practicing statewide as “senior judges”.

What are senior judges? Retired judges who are temporarily serving as judges.  Judges can retire, receive their pension and continue to get paid by taxpayers.

Double dippers: Senior judges’ combined compensation costs taxpayers millions

Click to see MN Senior Judges:→ Judicial Officer Directory    

Continue Reading: http://www.startribune.com/mn-district-courtrooms-seeing-unprecedented-influx-of-judges/282889361/

Image result for courthouse news serviceRetired Judges Fight for Right to Double Dip

ALBANY, N.Y. (CN) – New York is cracking down on double-dipping — the practice by which state judges collect both pensions and salaries after they hit retirement age — but the Court of Appeals focused Tuesday on whether putting retirees to work is actually cost-effective.

Arguing for the retired judges challenging the scheme, attorney Robert Spolzino noted that the state faces a new cost in trying to avoid paying his clients a salary.

Every time the state takes a judge off a case because they start collecting a pension, he said, the state begins paying into the pension of a new judge earning the same salary.

Meanwhile retired judges are “not getting anything extra by what they’re doing,” said Spolzino, of the firm Wilson Elser Modkowitz Edelman & Dicker.

“They are being paid for work they’re doing going forward,” he added.

Lee Adlerstein, an attorney for New York’s Administrative Board of the Courts, countered this position. Some retired judges pull in more than $250,000 a year between their fill-in salaries and their retirement pensions, he noted.

One of the jurists presiding over this afternoon’s appeal emphasized that the case will have far-reaching effects.

“It is relatively common,” Judge Eugene Fahey said of double dipping, noting  that he himself has heard of a number of judges fit the bill.

“So the question is then,” Fahey added, “it’s not the legality of the action but the criteria [used to limit it].”

New York judges must retire at age 70, but a provision in state judicial law allows retirees of the Supreme Court system to fill in as needed until age 76. In most states, a supreme court represents the highest tribunal, but the name is used in New York to designate trial courts for each of the 62 counties.

According to data from the fiscally conservative Empire Center for Public Policy, more than 500 people in New York sought and received permission to collect public pensions between 2015 and May 2016 while working for state or local government positions.

“These waivers are supposed to be used as temporary solutions for the rare instances when a retiree is the only person available and qualified to do a job,” Empire Center Executive Director Tim Hoefer said in a statement.

Taxpayers “have a good reason to question why they’re paying someone twice,” he added.

Retired justices who want to continue must seek recertification every two years from New York’s Administrative Board of the Courts, which evaluates for mental and physical fitness. When the state changed the rules in 2013, however, judges learned that they had to choose between staying on the bench of collecting pensions.

After the new policy went into effect, retired Judges Gerald Loehr, J. Emmett Murphy and William Miller filed suit. Case documents show that Loehr is entitled to a $66,000 annual pension, while Murphy and Miller receive a $91,300 and $89,000 yearly pension, respectively.

Their case hit the state’s highest court this afternoon after a three-judge panel in the Appellate Division found the new rules against double-dipping unconstitutional.

Court of Appeals Judge Jenny Rivera suggested today the rule might be overbroad.

“In this case, you just have a blanket rule that is ignoring the qualifications of the individual,” she said.

Rivera questioned Adlerstein why the state failed to define what was necessary in the board’s stated goal of “expediting the business of the court system.”

“Is there no line in the sand?” she asked. “Is it whatever the board says is necessary?”

Adlerstein argued that judges have no constitutional right to both a judge’s salary and a judge’s pension simultaneously.

Chief Judge Janet DiFiore did not appear to take part in this afternoon’s hearing with the other six judges on the Court of Appeals. How the  court will rule is still unclear. Some of the judges noted that the rule change costs the retired justices nothing: While retired judges serve on the bench, their pensions are merely suspended not revoked.

“No one is taking your pension away,” Judge Michael Garcia said.

Another key issue is whether judges have a right to be certificated. Spolzino said that there is no right to certification but that judges have a right to be considered for certification. “That is what this case is about,” he said.


MN Pera Logo

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota

Retirement Benefits
What is Combined Service?

Combined service can provide you with benefits for public service under more than one retirement program. However, you must have at least six months of service with each fund to qualify. For many PERA members, this is service under the Police & Fire, Coordinated, Basic, or Correctional plans, as well as the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund division of the Association. In addition to PERA’s defined benefit plans, it can also be public service covered by any of the retirement funds listed below:

  • Minnesota State Retirement System:
    – General Plan
    – Correctional Employees Retirement Plan
    – State Patrol Retirement Fund
    – Unclassified Employees Retirement Plan
    – Judges’ Retirement Fund
    – Legislators’ Retirement Plan
    – Elective State Officers’ Retirement Plan
  • Teachers Retirement Association
  • St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association
  • Duluth Teachers Retirement Fund Association (recently consolidated with Teachers Retirement Association)      http://www.mnpera.org/

Extraordinary Madness

Kids Horrified After Cops Hold Mock Child Sex Trafficking Drill, Without Saying It’s A Drill

By Jack Burns

Orange County, FL — The Florida Highway Patrol is reviewing its presence at the Girls State Program after troopers conducted a kidnapping/human trafficking drill which went “horribly wrong” according to WFTV News Channel 9.

The girl’s program is attended by some of best and brightest high-schoolers Florida has to offer. “Everyone who’s going is at the top of their class,” Cameron Carlyle said describing the high-quality candidates who attend the elite leadership camp. But no amount of education could have prepared the girls for what happened on the last night of their training.

SPONSORED CONTENT

The Girls State director along with six Florida State Troopers, all female, pulled an attendee aside and told her she would be participating in a kidnapping drill, one which highlighted the real-world problem of sex trafficking. Under the cover of secrecy, the volunteer named “Katrina” was taken to a safe place. Thereafter, roll call was taken with the remaining girls.

Carlyle, who volunteered this year to be a camp counselor, said when the count-off got to number 8, “We realized Katrina was missing.” Soon the State Troopers began screaming, she’d been kidnapped, and blamed several girls for her abduction.

The troopers told the attendees the girl had been kidnapped and was probably sold as a sex slave to human traffickers who would use her for prostitution purposes.

They began blaming the other girls in the room, as well. “I’ll never forget that feeling of just that ‘it’s totally my fault and now I’ll have to tell her parents she’d been taken,’” Carlyle said speaking of the experience.

It wasn’t until about a half-hour later, amid tears and paralyzing fears from attendees, that the girls learned their fellow camper was unharmed.

Carlyle said she had 17 girls who simply did not sleep that night, traumatized by the training experience gone horribly wrong. One girl in the program had been involved in a real human sex trafficking incident when she was younger and was emotionally shaken.

While the subject of sex trafficking is a very serious one which should not be taken lightly, it’s safe to say the FL State Troopers may not have put enough forethought and planning into the exercise. The fact that one attendee had been sex trafficked is proof enough the troopers had not potentially considered all the scenarios.

Any serious attempt to help teens prepare for the potential of being exploited sexually, must include how pedophiles seek to become authority figures, so they can use those positions to take advantage of children. Merely tormenting girls by hosting a fake kidnapping does absolutely nothing to prepare them later in life for any real scenarios.

Terri Miller of Stop Educator Sexual Abuse Misconduct & Exploitation is considered a leading expert on educator sex predation. In a recent interview, Miller described how authority figures are often teachers. “Perpetrators often wear a mask of deception,” Miller said. “It’s very common for these perpetrators to be teachers of the year and award-winning coaches.” She added the victim is, “the only one who knows the monster.”

But as The Free Thought Project has all too frequently reported, pedophiles are often police officers as well. In North Carolina, a police officer was recently convicted with seducing and impregnating a 14-year-old after obtaining permission from the teen’s mother to serve as her “mentor.”

Just this month, a police chief was arrested on felony charges of attempting to engage in sex with a minor. As Antimedia’s Carey Wedler reported, “Michael Zeug, 45, was arrested in Redwood Falls after soliciting sex with an undercover Department of Homeland Security agent via text message. Zeug contacted the ‘girl’ after seeing an online ad. The officer pretended to be a seventeen-year-old girl who wanted to make extra money, local CBS Minnesota outlet WCCO reported. Zeug appeared to acknowledge the risk, saying, ‘you’re only 17.’ He also said he had done this type of thing before and lied about his profession (as Chief of Police); he claimed to be a farmer.”

It’s unclear if lawsuits will result from the FL Highway Patrol’s missteps. However, make no mistake about it, leaders at Florida’s celebrated Girls State Program and the FHP owe each girl an appropriate apology, which should also include counseling paid for by the FL Highway Patrol. After all, whether they want to admit it or not, they’re now guilty of abusing children in their care, precisely what pedophiles do when given positions of authorities.

Jack Burns is an educator, journalist, investigative reporter, and advocate of natural medicine. This article first appeared here at The Free Thought Project.  http://www.activistpost.com/2017/06/kids-horrified-cops-hold-mock-child-sex-trafficking-drill-without-saying-drill.html

One More Way for Government to Get the Kids

New Ontario Law Allows Gov’t To Steal Kids From Parents Who Oppose “Gender Identity”

By Rachel Blevins

Ontario has just set a startling precedent with the passage of a new law that could lead to the government seizing children from parents who oppose the “Gender Identity” agenda.

Bill 89, the 2017 Children, Youth and Family Services Act, passed by a vote of 63-23 on June 1. The new law will have jurisdiction over child protective services, and adoption and foster care services.

One of the most notable parts of the bill is that when it comes to the state’s process for deciding which home a child should live in, it takes out the consideration of “the religious faith in which the child is being raised,” and replaces it with the child’s “gender identity” or “gender expression.”

Differences include: the current Act includes the child’s cultural background in this list while the new Act Chil the child’s cultural and linguistic heritage; the current Act includes the religious faith in which the child is being raised while the new Act includes the child’s race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition, warned that the new law does not just affect parents who are facing the risk of having their children seized by the state, it also affects parents who are looking to adopt.

“With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history,” Fonseca said. “Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”

Another troubling aspect in the new Ontario law can be found in what the government determines to be the “least disruptive course of action.” With Bill 89, it argues for the use of “prevention services, early intervention services and community support services.”

The least disruptive course of action that is available and is appropriate in a particular case to help a child, including the provision of prevention services, early intervention services and community support services, should be considered.

In a press release on the new law, the Ministry of Children and Youth Services described the legislation as helping “children and youth across the province thrive and reach their full potential by strengthening and modernizing child, youth and family services.” It noted that the law will put “a greater focus on early intervention, to help prevent children and families from reaching crisis situations at home.”

John Sikkema, a lawyer with the Association for Reformed Political Action in Canada, criticized the bill’s clause, and said that it could do more harm than good to a child when applied.

“You can imagine a situation where, say, a child’s teacher suspects that a child is gender questioning or something and they’re not being supported in that,” Sikkema said, noting that the teacher would then “actually have a duty to report certain things to a Children’s Aid Society who would look into it further.”

As The Free Thought Project has reported on multiple occasions, the United States has its own share of problems with Child Protective Services seizing children from families whose beliefs don’t align with the state.

However, the idea of basing a child’s safety in a home off of his/her “gender identity” sets a troubling precedent in the province of Ontario, and takes legal government invasion in the home to a new level.

Rachel Blevins is a Texas-based journalist who aspires to break the left/right paradigm in media and politics by pursuing truth and questioning existing narratives. This article first appeared here at The Free Thought Project.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT SAVING THE EARTH!

LEONARDO ‘PRIVATE JET’ DICAPRIO BASHES TRUMP OVER PARIS CLIMATE PULLOUT

The man who once flew 8,000 miles to pick up an “environmental award” is not happy

Leonardo DiCaprio waving

Leonardo DiCaprio – the man who once flew 8,000 miles on a private jet to pick up an “environmental award,” is bashing Donald Trump over his decision to pull the U.S. out of the Paris climate accord.

Yes, really.

Shortly after Trump made his announcement in the Rose Garden yesterday, DiCaprio tweeted, “Today, our planet suffered. It’s more important than ever to take action. #ParisAgreement.”

It’s unlikely that DiCaprio himself will be taking any action if that means curbing his own carbon-belching luxury celebrity lifestyle.

Last year, the Oscar winner took a round trip of 8,000 miles on a private jet from Cannes to New York and back again to collect an honor from a clean-water advocacy group.

After flying on another private jet to attend the soccer World Cup in Brazil in 2014, DiCaprio stayed on a 470-foot yacht owned by oil billionaire Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The yacht uses fuel equal to 83 American household’s annual worth of CO2 emissions.

After being entertained by the oil billionaire, DiCaprio attended a People’s Climate March in New York where he protested against – you guessed it – the oil industry.

During his Oscar winning speech, DiCaprio decried global warming as “the most urgent threat facing our entire species”.

This was after the actor had taken no less than six private jet trips from New York to LA in the space of six weeks.

He also took a private jet from L.A. to Las Vegas and stayed in Vegas for just eight hours to attend a party before flying all the way back again.

Leo was so worried about global warming that just months after his Oscar speech, he got his celebrity friends to fly 6,000 miles from LA to St Tropez so they could listen to his speech on, you guessed it, global warming.

And I’m not done.

Leo’s 2000 movie The Beach was made at the cost of a precious eco-system in Thailand being completely ruined.

As part of his environmental activist re-brand, DiCaprio also complains about over-fishing, a passion that didn’t prevent him from serving his guests whole sea bass, having flown them all in on CO2 belching helicopters, at an event where a film was screened about – you guessed it – over-fishing.

DiCaprio has even been lambasted by environmentalists like Robert Rapier, who accused the actor of living a lifestyle that, “diminishes his moral authority to lecture others on reducing their own carbon emissions.”

Really? Ya think?

DiCaprio represents everything that’s wrong with today’s virtue signaling Hollywood elite.

They lecture ordinary Americans about their lifestyle to earn entertainment industry brownie points, while living extravagant, luxury, carbon-spewing lifestyles themselves.


MN has been very involved in pushing this climate monarchy to impose draconian restrictions on its residents. After Trump withdrew from the agreement, MN announced that they will proceed with their own climate change strategy. That’s so shocking!

Star TribuneInstead of following the lead of the federal government, Minnesota will look to local communities to tackle climate change, state officials said.
With a plan adopted in 2007, the state has been a national leader in pursuing an aggressive plan to reduce emissions of the chemicals that cause climate change.
STARTRIBUNE.COM
Related Articles Below

The 2016 Climate Adaptation Conference: Transforming Awareness into Action, was held January 28, at the Minneapolis DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel. Over 250 participants attended the conference which through panel discussions and breakout sessions, explored a variety of critical issues affected by climate change, such as water quantity and quality, energy grid resiliency, impacts on tribal communities and effective communication strategies.

The day opened with presentations by panelists representing Minnesota corporations 3M, General Mills and Best Buy. Climate change can potentially cause disruption in production of goods and these companies are creating and implementing strategies to both overcome the challenges of a changing climate and reduce their corporate carbon footprint.

Continue Reading: https://www.wrc.umn.edu/publications/minnegram/minnegram-spring-2016/climate-overview

Coleman and other Mississippi River mayors to attend Paris climate conference

Seven mayors from national cities along the Mississippi River — including St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman and St. Cloud Mayor Dave Kleis — will attend the December U.N. conference on climate change in Paris.

Coleman said of the conference:

The Mississippi mayors have direct experience with climate disruption, surviving floods, droughts, and hurricanes. That’s why we must be part of the global discussion on climate change. Together, we will be a voice for the Mississippi and other river basins at the U.N. meeting this fall and beyond to help secure the world’s food supply.

Continue Reading: https://www.minnpost.com/political-agenda/2015/09/coleman-and-other-mississippi-river-mayors-attend-paris-climate-conference


Image result for New American logo

I had the honor of attending one of Tom DeWeese’s speaking events on climate change and the unelected government in Minneapolis in 2015. He has written an excellent article that connects the dots on this scam that is robbing us of our freedoms. Excerpts below:

The Principles of Freedom vs. Agenda 21 

Written by 

Global Warming/Climate Change. It has been so discredited in the true scientific community that proponents have become almost silly in their continued attempts to push it. So, why don’t they stop? Why is it so vitally important that they continue to promote something that clearly is unproven, to say the least?

It’s because all of Agenda 21 policy is built on the premise that man is destroying the Earth. Climate Change is their “Proof.” To eliminate that premise is to remove all credibility and purpose for their entire agenda. They are willing to go to any length, even lies, to keep the climate change foot on our throats.

But don’t take my word for it. I’ll let them speak for themselves:

Christine Stewart (Former Canadian Minister of the Environment) said:
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” 

Timothy Wirth (President, UN Foundation) and former official of the Clinton Administration said,
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”

Paul Watson (Co-Founder of Green Peace) said,
“It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true.”

Cheap Energy is the enemy of the Earth. To the average person, the drive to stop any ability to obtain cheap energy makes no sense. People are hurting economically. Jobs are lost. Energy costs are skyrocketing. Any attempt to drill oil, fracking of shale gas, and mining coal are all vigorously blocked by government and green policy. Yet the government spends billions of dollars on “alternative energy” such as wind and solar, which provides less than 3% of our energy needs. Why? What is the motivation to put such shackles on the US economic engine?

The excuse is that energy use drives up CO2 emissions and accelerates global warming – the excuse necessary to “harmonize” the US into the socialist, Sustainable global noose.

But, according to some anti-energy advocates, the fear of cheap energy goes beyond environmental protection. Energy availability, they say, helps build wealth for individuals and removes them from the rolls of the dependent. And you see, dependency on government is a little- mentioned, but major goal of sustainable policy.

Prof. Paul Ehrlich (Professor of Population Studies, Stanford University)said: “Giving society cheap, abundant energy is the worst thing that could ever happen to the planet.”

Amory Lovins (Rocky Mountain Institute), said:
“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.”

Jeremy Rifkin (Greenhouse Crisis Foundation),
“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”

There is a great uprising beginning to take place around the world. The Internet has become an incredible tool to spread the word of freedom. And oppressed people are reading our founding documents and dreaming of freedom for themselves.

Truth is on our side. Right is on our side. And I believe time is on our side. Call me Pollyanna if you will, but I see signs of change. The immigration battle; the battle against Obamacare; the entire Tea Party movement – all show that people are alert. The sleeping giant is awakening.

The truth is, in our lifetime we are probably not going to see America become what we might envision to be the perfect world. Frankly, many of us would disagree among ourselves about what that perfect world should be.

But, in the face of the forces of tyranny which we now fight every day, if we can preserve our nation’s sovereignty and independence and keep the Bill of Rights alive – a document based on the three principles of freedom – then frankly that will be an incredible victory.

And for our children and grandchildren to have a hope of living in Freedom – that will be enough.

Click to read article in its entirety:
https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/18102-the-principles-of-freedom-vs-agenda-21

Secret Federal Grand Jury

Source, with links and images:

What Does It Mean.Com

Most Secret Grand Jury In American History Paralyzes Washington With Fear

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An intriguing Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the most secret Federal Grand Jury ever empanelled in American history has paralyzed Washington D.C. with fear after its swiftly moving this past Friday (19 April) to claim its first Hillary Clinton victim just hours before President Donald Trump left the United States on his historic trip to Saudi Arabia.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report, Federal Grand Juries in America have a maximum of 23 members, 16 of whom must be present to form a quorum, and indictments are returned by a vote of 12 or more members whose “information/evidence” presented to them is done by what are called United States Attorneys, who are that nations chief criminal and civil law prosecutors—all of whom are supposed to believe that no one is above the law.

Being led by Joon H. Kim, the acting US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, this report continues, the secrecy of this Federal Grand Jury was so complete it was able to indict, achieve the arrest of, and conviction, of a top Hillary Clinton surrogate and former US Congressman named Anthony Weiner in less than 24 hours with no leaking to the US mainstream propaganda media—and was so rapidly accomplished, Weiner’s wife, and Hillary Clinton’s top aid, Huma Abedin didn’t even know what was occurring, and who hours after Weiner pled guilty, filed for divorce against him.

Having agreed to a plea deal where he agreed not appeal his up to 2-year US Federal prison sentence for the crime of “sexting” with a 15-year-old girl child, and his further agreeing to be listed as a sexual offender for the rest of his life, this report details, the unprecedented speed of Anthony Weiner’s demise this past Friday showed his being arrested, appearing in US Federal Court, pleading guilty to his crimes, and then released on bail until his final September (2017) sentencing, all occurred in the span of 2 hours.

As to the incredible secrecy and speed in which Anthony Weiner was processed by President Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ), this report explains, is believed to be due to his becoming a witness to Hillary Clinton crimes and before he could be suicided or killed, and as evidenced by US Attorney Joon Kim only asking for a 21-27 prison sentenced, as opposed to the 10-year sentence Weiner was facing.

Anthony Weiner accepts plea deal in US Federal Court on 19 May 2017

Aiding US Attorney Joon Kim in the unprecedented rapid arrest, prosecution and conviction of Anthony Weiner, this report further details, was William F. Sweeney Jr. who is the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and who prior to his present posting was the Special Agent In Charge of Philadelphia—that is the location the SVR had previously indentified (on 13 May) had been put on alert to prepare for at least 23 “high security political defendants” being placed in the Federal Detention Center (FDC) located in that city.

Important to note about FBI Assistant Director William Sweeny Jr., this report says, was that in late 2015 he was preparing to present evidence before a Federal Grand Jury proving that both Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, were “integral parts” and the “main beneficiaries” of a massive “green energy” ponzi scheme that funneled millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation money laundering organization using a scheme concocted by their close friend and associate Troy Wragg.

Troy Wragg (center/circled) next to former President Bill Clinton at the annual meeting on the Clinton Global Initiative in New York on 25 September 2009

In late 2015, this report continues, FBI Agent In Charge William Sweeny Jr. was refused by then FBI Director James Comey to further investigate the Clinton’s as a few months prior to Troy Wragg and his criminal associates being indicted, Hillary Clinton had announced she was running to be US president—and that Comey said he wasn’t going to have the FBI interfere with.

To “placate/subdue” FBI Agent In Charge William Sweeny Jr. after he had stopped his criminal investigation into the Clinton’s, this report continues, last July (2016) FBI Director Comey elevated him to be the Assistant Director In Charge of the New York Field Office—but shortly after President Trump was sworn into office, Sweeny Jr. approached then US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara to reopen the Clinton investigation—which Bharara refused to do and led to Trump firing him on 11 March.

With Bharara now gone, this report says, President Trump elevated Joon H. Kim to be the acting US Attorney and work with Sweeny Jr. on the Clinton investigation, and whose first targets for prosecution were Anthony Weiner and his wife Huma Abedin—but that FBI Director Comey attempted to derail on 3 May when he testified before the US Congress that Abedin was not criminally charged even though she sent classified emails to her husband—and that led President Trump to firing him 6 days later on 9 May.

Central to FBI Director Comey’s protection scheme to keep the Clinton’s and their criminal associates from being prosecuted, this report explains, was his bizarre legal theory that “intent” first had to be established before anyone could be prosecuted—but who was directly opposed by now acting US Attorney Joon H. Kim who in prosecuting some of America’s most notorious mafia and Asian gangs stated that “intent” didn’t matter in criminal prosecutions, only if a crime had been committed.

Important to note about Joon H. Kim too, this report details, is that he is well known in the Kremlin for his work on behalf of Russia when he was a top lawyer for the international law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton—and though based in New York City, this organization of some of the top attorneys in the world has been named 8 times as the “Russian Law Firm of the Year—most especially when Kim and his international arbitration legal team successfully protected the Federation (between 2010-2013) from a French lawsuit seeking damages for unpaid bonds issued over 100 years ago.

To how Joon H. Kim was picked by President Trump to lead the prosecution of the Clinton’s and their criminal associates, this report further notes, was accomplished through negotiations between Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton managing partner Michael A. Gerstenzang and one of his most powerful clients named Henry Kravis—who as a co-founder of the American multinational private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) was interviewed by President Trump to be his US Secretary of the Treasury.

With some quarters in America praising President Trump’s actions in keeping criminals such as the Clinton’s from taking over the presidency, this report concludes, this nations mainstream “fake news” propaganda media, nevertheless, continues trying to hide the Clinton’s assassination murder of Seth Rich for his leaking tens-of-thousands of Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton emails to Wikileaks—and that led Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to compare the US media to those of Soviet communist times by his stating:

I sometimes get the impression that many U.S. media outlets work according to a principle which was common in the Soviet Union. Back then, people used to joke that the newspaper Pravda [Truth] had no truth in it, and the Izvestia [News] paper has no news in it. I get the impression that many U.S. media operate in the same way.”

WINNING! THEY KNOW THEY’RE GOING DOWN!

Podesta Laundering Clinton Foundation Assets Before RICO Steps In Under Civilian Asset Forfeiture

CSS-Offical-New-Logo2

podesta 2

John Podesta is buying up gold, art and other valuables as he converts Clinton Foundation laundered money to hard assets and is hiding these assets around the world. Clearly, they think RICO is going to be seizing Clinton Foundation assets.

The complete story is contained in the following video.

Please donate to offset the costs of The Common Sense Show

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL AND DON’T FORGET TO “LIKE” US

THE ENEMIES WITHIN

 

home-page2

 

“The Enemies Within” profiles Twenty Senators and more than Hundred Representatives.

Their ties to Communist Party USA, Democratic Socialists of America, Workers World Party, the Institute for Policy Studies,Council for a Livable World and other radical anti-American organizations.

 

 

If you would like to order by mail
please mail checks made out to “Exposing the Enemies Within” to:

Exposing the Enemies Within
409 Washington St, Suite A
Cedar Falls, IA 50613

*Please include shipping in payment

Click here to Download Order Form

CLICK TO VIEW TREVOR LOUDON’S  WEBSITE


Trevor Loudon, Alan Duff, Retired Army Major and author of Fixing America’s Shattered Politics, and Larry Frost, Retired Army Intelligence turned lawyer spoke in St. Cloud, MN on May 24th.

Click to zoom↓

Listen to KNSI radio interviews below.

Trevor Loudon talks about “The Enemies Within” on Ox in the Afternoon Segment 1

MAY 24, 2017 4:31 PM

Trevor Loudon Segment 2

%d bloggers like this: