SHOCKING!

It came as no surprise that the MN Court of Appeals rubber stamped the decision of the Dakota County District Court in my case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State of Minnesota vs Deirdre Elise Evavold.

Criminal appeals are handled by a battery of anonymous law clerks who know that they have to uphold the conviction no matter what. They write memos for the judges that are mostly if not entirely based on the prosecution brief and they draft the  decisions affirming the conviction.

The opinion affirmed the fact that illegally withholding and suppressing evidence, witness tampering, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, obstruction of justice and trial by ambush is perfectly acceptable, and in fact, encouraged.

Gallery For > Courtroom Lawyer Cartoon

Remember, a jury verdict is only as fair as the trial, and in this case as well as the companion cases, a fair trial or appeal was never going to happen!

The tragic reality is that you can be a law abiding citizen and have your freedom and rights taken away under the current  system. The bright side is that many people are waking up and when you’re aware of the operation you can defeat it!

 

 

Comment on Corruption of the judiciary: Where do we go for help?

Tru Tuoneself
Oct 19, 2016 @ 09:28:08

I was a lawyer, fought judicial corruption in three Texas Counties and at the highest levels of government. I am no longer a lawyer. We are well beyond citing proper law my friends. I investigated, documented and testified in state courts, appellate courts, the Texas Supreme Court, regarding the corruption and I am an expert on recognizing and documenting corruption. What I can tell you is we are at war my fellow commoners, at war! The enemy is just not coming to our shores with tanks and planes, but surreptitiously has taken over our government, one office at a time, one judge position at a time, one court clerk position at a time and it is only going to get far worse, before it gets better. When someone is overly arrogant and seems not worried about the courts or law enforcement, you will know why soon enough. The arrogance gives it away and the refusal and disrespect for the law does as well. They will not enforce the laws, investigate or prosecute and they will continue to permit the pillaging, while slowly changing the laws till we all find ourselves in Nazi America. Drastic times require drastic measures. See you on the front lines.

Advertisements

Warrentless Search and Seizures

Smart Devices Are Snitching On Owners And Rewriting The Criminal Justice System

By Nicholas West

A new type of court case is slowly but steadily emerging within the American legal system: alleged crimes being detected from data supplied by smart devices.

Several cases over the last few years have focused on data transmitted within the modern smart home, while a couple of others add an extra dimension of police completely reconstructing a crime scene based upon data collected from the home as well as the various Internet-connected devices that we wear.

The very nature of the 1st, 4th and 5th Amendments to the Constitution appears to be at stake.

In December of last year an Arkansas murder case made headlines not so much for the death itself, but how a suspect was brought into custody. James Bates hosted a party at his Bentonville home on the night of November 21st, 2015. At some point during the event a man drowned in a hot tub on the property.  Bates claimed to have found the victim the next morning when he awoke, stating that it was a tragic accident, but Arkansas police obtained smart water meter readings that showed an anomaly between 1 a.m. and 3 a.m. Based solely on this data – and obtained without a warrant – Bates was arrested and charged with 1st degree murder.

Somewhat ironically, James Bates subsequently requested recordings from his Amazon Echo to defend himself against these charges, which resulted in Amazon waiving their standard privacy conditions.

A second case followed wherein we saw a police narrative emerge that a crime had been prevented by a home’s smart system. A domestic dispute resulted in Eduardo Barros allegedly wielding a firearmagainst his girlfriend and threatening to kill her. However, during the argument he exclaimed, “Did you call the sherrifs?” This activated a voice-controlled sound system in his home and dialed 911. After an hours-long standoff, the suspect was taken into custody and charged. Law enforcement was quick to hail the smart technology as having “saved a life.”  But it was the presiding judge who shook privacy advocates by accepting the evidence regardless of how it was obtained, saying that there was indeed probable cause for the arrest without a warrant.

Continue Reading: https://www.activistpost.com/2017/10/smart-devices-are-snitching-on-owners-and-rewriting-the-criminal-justice-system.html

Coming After Us Six Ways from Sunday

Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Logo | Spivak ... Founders_Finger_Gulag

Re: Andy Ostrowski’s false psych hold and a most curious comment

Subject: Re: Andy Ostrowski — recent comment on post
Date: Oct 9, 2017 10:49 AM
JoAnne is absolutely correct in her posts.
The Americans with Disabilities Act, confirms the RULE OF LAW and the Constitution. In order for any involuntary incarceration under the 5th and 14th Amendments DUE PROCESS must be strictly observed.  All that this requires is NOTICE AND HEARING.  There is a District Court case in Wisconsin that suggests that in this regard Form TRUMPS Substance, and a totally biased finder of fact still meets the criteria.  However, this was not the situation!
An ex-parte commitment order to be enforced by Police Act is so wrong that it is a massive stretch for any policeman participating to not be legally and criminally culpable for any action on his part that interferes with the civil rights of a victim – in this case Andy.   (The fact that Andy may have given his key to someone is irrelevant – and the fact that he might have on social media made statements that were offensive to someone are not grounds for summary incarceration.  THIS IS NOT ALLOWABLE under the Constitution and ANY LAW THAT IS or is interpreted to deny basic DUE PROCESS is void.   A middle school student is required to know this fact – to require a well paid judge/lawyer/policeman to be aware of such a proposition is equally appropriate.
I agree with JoAnne — ANDY’s incarceration was WRONGFUL, and criminal.    All the miscreants involved ought to be charged with KIDNAPPING, tried and sent to jail!   The Gulag cannot be tolerated in America.
Ken Ditkowsky
 Continue Reading: https://marygsykes.com/2017/10/09/re-andy-ostrowskis-false-psych-hold-and-a-most-curious-comment/

SILICON VALLEY PUBLISHER LAUNCHES NEW PUBLICATION COVERING FAMILY COURT, CIVIL COURT, AND CPS CONTROVERSY

SILICON VALLEY PUBLISHER LAUNCHES NEW PUBLICATION COVERING FAMILY COURT, CIVIL COURT, AND CPS CONTROVERSY

In San Francisco on Sunday October 1 – in the shadow of the California Supreme Court, Judicial Council and Commission on Judicial Performance – the launch party for Ex Parte was held. Pictures are included with this post.

Ex Parte is a new print and online source for legal news and opinion from Silicon Valley publisher Susan J. Bassi. Court watchdog and CJP reform advocate Joe Sweeney will lead the editorial staff.

The publication and website will specialize in investigative reporting on California family, civil and probate courts, and Child Protective Services (CPS).

At the San Francisco kick-off event, court and CPS victims, reporters, editors, attorneys, academics, and funders from throughout the state all met for the first time together, face-to-face. The Ex Parte concept germinated and was developed through social media.

The publisher, editors, and reporters at the start-up news organization assert that they will report on the Judicial Branch controversies and human interest stories often overlooked or ignored by existing legal publications, and the mainstream media.

Among other subjects, Ex Parte reporters will be assigned to investigate civil rights and federal law violations – including racketeering, honest services fraud, and misuse of federal funds – by state court judges, court administrators and employees, lawyers, and state and local CPS workers, according to the publisher.

For more information, visit the Ex Parte website at https://www.expartepress.com.

Always Question the Official Narrative

The minute this massacre happened, calls went out for gun safety policies, stemming the tide of gun violence, banning military-style assault weapons (which by the way, are already banned for the average citizen) and creating more gun laws. Criminals and terrorists will find weapons whatever the law is because they don’t abide by the law!

Shortly after the mass shootings, the media were reporting as undisputed fact that a heavily armed “lone wolf” gunman opened fire from a 32-floor hotel room on an open-air concert on the Las Vegas Strip in the deadliest mass shooting in US history.

Police said Paddock, a retired accountant, killed himself before a SWAT team breached his room in the Mandalay Bay hotel overlooking the venue for the country music concert.

The anti-gun rhetoric and calls for more drastic efforts to strip citizens of the right to bear arms is simply a policy of more government, fewer individual rights and a hyper-violent, militarized nation constantly under martial law.

The reason the official story must always, without exception, be questioned is that the government has every reason to lie or at least mislead—what they might call “perception management” or “necessary illusions.”  The government must be seen as always legitimate, and always essentially rightly-guided for it to maintain its power.  So it is always in the interest of the government—in this case (and many others), embodied by the police—to make some horrible event somehow seem okay or justified (otherwise, the government’s power will eventually be threatened when people get sick of too many such horrible events, as is already happening here and abroad).  This benefit of the doubt that the media give to the government must be revoked by us, the people.  Don’t believe what they tell you anymore because there’s a good chance that the complete opposite is true.  Clinton Kirby-Liberty Road Media 

JIMMY KIMMEL BASHES GUN RIGHTS AFTER LAS VEGAS MASSACRE (BUT HAS HIS OWN ARMED SECURITY)

Talk show host’s hypocrisy exposed

 | Infowars.com – OCTOBER 3, 2017

Jimmy Kimmel Bashes Gun Rights After Las Vegas Massacre (But Has His Own Armed Security)

Jimmy Kimmel used the platform of his talk show last night to rail against gun rights in the aftermath of the Las Vegas massacre but failed to mention the fact that he has his own armed security and recently increased it.

Breaking down in tears at one point, the Jimmy Kimmel Live host said Republican lawmakers, “should be praying for God to forgive them for letting the gun lobby run this country.”

The video is YouTube’s number one trending video and has received well over a million views overnight.

Kimmel went on to slam politicians who “won’t do anything about this because the NRA has their balls in a money clip,” adding that their “thoughts and your prayers are insufficient.”

He then turned the monologue into an anti-Trump rant, declaring, “There are a lot of things we could do about it. But we don’t, which is interesting because when someone with a beard attacks us, we tap phones, we invoke travel bans, we build walls, we take every possible precaution to make sure it doesn’t happen again. But when an American buys a gun and kills other Americans, then there’s nothing we can do about that.”

Breitbart’s Ian Mason debunks most of Kimmel’s claims, almost all of which had nothing to do with the weapons used by killer Stephen Paddock during Sunday night’s massacre.

But for Kimmel, it’s very much a case of do as I say, not do as I do.

A 2015 clip from his show uploaded to YouTube features one of the security guard’s whose job it is to protect Kimmel and his production staff.

When his shirt lifts up for a brief moment, the man is seen to be carrying a Glock pistol in a holster.

In other words – Kimmel is against gun rights, unless it applies to his own personal security.

Recent reports also confirm that Kimmel has beefed up his security due to the increasingly polarized and political nature of his rants.

According to the Mercury News, “Ever since the late-night show host began crusading against the effort by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act, there have been “incidents with Trump supporters” that have forced him to increase security at his show tapings.”

In response, “the show has increased personnel at both the front and back entrances. This personnel consists of highly-trained, off-duty police officers.”

Judging by the video clip of the security guard above, these security guards are almost certain to be packing.

Kimmel’s hypocrisy is a reminder of the fact that many liberals rely on men carrying guns to protect them but want to deny that right to the rest of the American people.

Michael Moore, who built part of his career on tearing down the second amendment, admitted in a 2008 Larry King interview that he owns a gun and also relies on armed security.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: 

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

 

 

 

Activist Lawyer Released

Hallelujah! Andy Ostrowski lawyer activist has been released and we have video conference he is okay

some comments from Ken Ditkowsky:

AT this point in time Andy has been free – below is a link to his interview with John Adams   – it is worth a listen – at least in part.
On Friday, September 29, 2017, 8:10:01 PM CDT, Brian Fedorka <bfedorka82@gmail.com> wrote:
You can go to his page for a live video interview (crappy audio) earlier today with John Adams. If you don’t trust the link below then to repeat, simply visit Andy’s facebook page, ‘Andy Ostrowski’.
-Brian
It is now clear that we are in fact all in danger.  As an attorney Andy had the training to know what he was facing and to deal with it; however, had the miscreants been able to drug him — he would have been a candidate for “elder cleansing!
Now that the ordeal is over, Andy indicates that he wants to get on with his life – however — the wrongful mental health arrest of Andy is a warning for every one of us — Democracy is not a spectator sport and in a flash – any one of us, including some of us who feel immune, can be hauled off to the Gulag and the next time any one sees us – they see a zombie!    A dose or two of the right chemical and  – bingo!   You are none person!

Continue Reading: https://marygsykes.com/2017/09/30/hallelujah-andy-ostrowski-lawyer-activist-has-been-released-and-we-have-video-conference-he-is-okay/

MaryGSykes.com

Things That Make You Go Hmmm …

Mariel Alexandra Grimm was convicted of first degree assault of a 13 month old toddler in July 2017. The child suffered a subdural hemorrhage that the child abuse pediatrician determined was associated with a violent acceleration-deceleration event, such as would happen in a high-speed car crash or the shaking or throwing of a baby. The boy survived his injuries, but suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
I was attending my probation violation hearing at the same courthouse on the day Grimm was sentenced by Judge David Knutson. He sentenced Grimm to 90 days in jail and 15 years probation as he determined she had a clean record, cooperated with court processes and was unlikely to reoffend.
Grimm was also given 60 days of electronic home monitoring and must perform 30 days on Sentencing to Service crews and 200 hours of community work service, as well as pay a $1,000 fine and restitution. Grimm could have received a prison sentence of up to 20 years.

Minnesota daycare provider sentenced to 90 days in jail, maintains innocence

POSTED: SEP 28 2017 10:32AM CDT VIDEO POSTED: SEP 28 2017 06:36PM CDT UPDATED: SEP 29 2017 11:11AM CDT

 – Convicted of assault — a crime she says she didn’t commit – an Eagan, Minnesota daycare provider facing up to eight years in prison was given a much more lenient sentence Thursday morning. Mariel Grimm, 33, received a stayed sentence and will spend 90 days in county jail, with 15 years of probation.

Grimm has maintained her innocence. Despite her assertions, a court found her guilty of assaulting a toddler. Grimm was caring for the 13-month-old boy last September when she says he suddenly had some kind of seizure after waking up from a nap.

Continue Reading: http://www.fox9.com/news/mariel-grimm-sentencing


Now let’s look at my sentencing conditions

 

 

 

Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4227               

State of Minnesota vs Deirdre Elise Evavold

Fee Totals $11,373.00

My contested probation violation hearing is scheduled for November 2, 2017.