Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

First Amendment Court Case #19AV-CR-17-16709

Contrary to the false tweets put out by Michael Brodkorb, I did have my pre-trial hearing for my false harassment restraining order (HRO) violation. This was not a hearing related to additional criminal charges and in fact, I still have not received documentation regarding these “new charges”. Brodkorb always seems to have the inside scoop as to what’s going down before I’m ever notified.  Hmmmm……


Michael Brodkorb: “At the hearing on December 13, 2017, Elliott said that Evavold’s post published the private address of the Rucki family on a platform with a “dangerous” audience. Evavold did not respond to Elliott’s claims in court, but Judge Kanning said he would grant the motion filed by Elliott.”
Judge Asphaug presided over yesterday’s hearing and indicated that the motion hearing to vacate the harassment restraining order will take place prior to any further hearings. This is the same judge that signed the ex-parte harassment restraining order against me for my crime of referencing the petitioner    on this blog and presided over our “Parental Deprivation” cases.
Click to view: Supreme Court Petition
BTW, I’ve NEVER had an HRO against me, but petitioner has had several filed against him as well as an endless stream of police reports, CPS reports, letters, and orders for protection.
Below are examples of petitioner’s patterns of behavior that he is empowered to continue due to the cover-up by law enforcement, attorneys and judges.



(Double click to zoom)






The above case was in front of  none other than Judge Karen Asphaug and prosecuted by Elliot Knetsch who is now prosecuting me.  A preliminary hearing was held on December 31, 2009 and as a result of the hearing, a trial was scheduled for February 8, 2010. On the eve of the trial, the defense filed a motion to dismiss for “lack of probable cause.” That motion was granted without a hearing by Judge Asphaug and the case was thrown out.

Image result for save the date

My free speech hearing is scheduled for March 14th at the Dakota County Western Service Center in Apple Valley.


 Dakota County Western Service Center
Dakota County Western Service Center in Apple Valley, MN.14955 Galaxie Ave. West
Apple Valley, MN 55124





Yellow Journalism



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:  Yellow journalism, or the yellow press, is a US term for a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers. Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering or sensationalism. By extension, the term yellow journalism is used today as a pejorative to decry any journalism that treats news in an unprofessional or unethical fashion.



Michael Wolff is the author of the controversial book that is highly critical of President Trump’s first year in the White House and says his book shows Donald Trump is unfit for the job. Wolff claims his revelations will eventually “bring down” the US President.




Fake news: CNN’s Brian Stelter doesn’t recognize his OWN words of caution about ‘Fire and Fury’ author

Posted at 7:07 pm on January 6, 2018 by Brett T.

As Twitchy has reported, CNN’s Brian Stelter has been instrumental in keeping the narrative about President Trump’s mental fitness alive this week, but we can’t help but question his memory after the GOP sent out this tweet about author Michael Wolff’s “Fire and Fury”:

Continue Reading:


Michael Brodkorb founded Misisng In Minnesota in July 2016. Brodkorb states that Missing In Minnesota provides detailed news, analysis, and commentary on the continuing developments involving the Grazzini-Rucki case.

Allison Mann

Allison Mann


In May 2017, Missing in Minnesota announced the addition of Allison Mann as a contributing author. Mann is a paralegal with Elliott Law Office and lives in Lakeville, Minnesota with her husband and family.

“Elliott Law Offices provides legal services to David Rucki and his family, but Elliott Law Office is not affiliated with Missing in Minnesota” ~Michael Brodkorb


Order for Continuance

If you are served with a restraining order, you have the right to a hearing to contest the order, present evidence, testify, and cross examine witnesses. The judge must find that you caused or attempted to cause physical harm, or that you put someone in fear of imminent serious physical harm, or that you caused someone to have sexual relations with you by using force, threat or duress. If none of these standards are met, the judge should not issue a restraining order against you. You may remember that an ex-parte temporary restraining order was granted by Judge Karen Asphaug in July of 2017.

Judge Philip Kanning is a retired judge that is assigned to my civil harassment case. Kanning was also involved in the Grazzini-Rucki marital dissolution.

Date Submitted: 4/27/2015 4:17:01 PM
Case Style: In the Marriage of SANDRA SUE GRAZZINI-RUCKI vs DAVID VICTOR RUCKI *** Judge Kanning Assigned ***
Filing Code: Service Only

Judge Michael Mayer is assigned to my HRO violation criminal case. He was the judge that was on the welfare case of the girls after they were found in November 2015 and had them sent to California for reunification with their father.

Judge Apshaug is assigned to my probation violation case. As most of you are aware, she is the judge that presided over all 4 of our criminal trials.

If a judge is aware of circumstances that could cause his impartiality to be questioned, the judge is supposed to disclose them for the record. It’s not surprising that this didn’t happen in my case and it’s not surprising that the malicious and baseless litigation is continuing to move forward.Brodkorb will report the false updates on this case, so stay tuned for updates from reliable sources.


The Revolving Door of Convoluted Court Hearings

When We Lose Free Speech-We Lose Everything

Fallout from 20/20’s Fake Broadcast “Footprints in the Snow”

Image may contain: 9 people, people smiling, text
The Women’s Coalition

Watch 20/20 Tomorrow! Features Protective Mom Sandra’s Case
Women’s Coalition Communications Director Damon Dumas Interviewed
Dear MSM Videos Will Be Aired; SHARE Post

UPDATE: Boycott ABC for Biased Reporting!

20/20’s Elizabeth Vargas flew to Santa Monica to interview Damon Dumas. Damon was expecting to speak as The Women’s Coalition Communications Director, and as such would be letting the public know about how Sandra’s case is just one of millions around the world in which children are being taken away from women and given to fathers, most of whom are abusive. However, Damon was just asked about his own case and attempted to fit in the larger picture.

The decision was made that it would be best coming from Damon since he is harder to discredit and there had been reports that Vargas had made Sandra look like a liar/alienator in her prison interview. However, after The Women’s Coalition Director Cindy Dumas made the producer, Sean Dooley, aware of that and refused to do an interview because of it, he promised to look at all of Sandra’s documents to help confirm that she is not a liar, which he did.

Cindy did interview at length over the phone, provided them with facts and research and, most importantly, the Dear MSM videos showing this is a women’s civil rights crisis. Parts of the videos will be aired, however it is not known which ones. Thanks to all who participated and for those who did not, you can still send a 2 to 3 minute video to help the cause and for other journalists to see. See instructions on the Dear MSM page:

The producer appears to want to genuinely portray the protective mothers’ side of the story. We shall see…. He was asked to give The Women’s Coalition acknowledgement for Damon’s interview and for the videos so the public would become aware of our organization. If you think he does a good job on this segment, you can thank him at: The Women’s Coalition will post the segment as soon as it is archived.

20/20 PROMO:
Timeline: How Parents’ Bitter Divorce and Custody Battle Led to the Disappearance of Two Sisters…/timeline-parents-bitter-divo…/story…

Living in Lakeville, Minnesota, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and David Rucki appeared to be doting and loving parents to their five children, Nico, Samantha, Gianna, Nia and Gino.

But despite the happy moments their home videos captured, Sandra said she suffered years of emotional and physical abuse at David’s hand. She also claims he abused the children.

“We’d lock ourselves in the bedroom because we’re scared. We just didn’t know how his behavior was going to be from one day to the next,” Sandra, 50, told ABC News’ “20/20.”

By 2011, Sandra said she had enough and filed for divorce. But what ensued was a bitter he-said, she-said dispute with their five children at the center.

Two years later, a court-appointed psychologist determined that Sandra had been engaging in parental alienation, manipulating her children into fearing their father. Custody of the five children was temporarily transferred from Sandra to a relative. However, the two oldest daughters, Samantha, now 17, and Gianna, now 16, who were often vocal about their claim that their father was abusive, ran away and disappeared. The sisters were eventually found in 2015.

Today, Sandra is awaiting trial for felony charges of deprivation of parental rights, while David is attempting to move forward with his children. Sandra remains steadfast that she has only ever wanted to protect her children, and David denies he was ever abusive to Sandra and their kids.

See a timeline of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and David Rucki’s dispute below:

From the Promo:
Timeline: How Parents’ Bitter Divorce and Custody Battle Led to the Disappearance of Two Sisters…/timeline-parents-bitter-divo…/story…

[Pictured: Damon Dumas (previously Moelter) at the interview (top right); Sandra Rucki (bottom right)]

Image may contain: 9 people, people smiling, text

—–Original Message—–
From: Rachel Alintoff <>
To: channing.dungey <>
Cc: thewomenscoalitionpac <>; patrice <>
Sent: Mon, Apr 11, 2016 8:17 am
Subject: Boycotting ABC

Dear President Dungey,

I am with The Women’s Coalition and am writing to let you know that we will be boycotting ABC until you retract Friday night’s episode “Footprints in the Snow”, issue an apology to Sandra Rucki, Cindy Dumas and women around the world who have been implicated.

As a domestic violence survivor myself and a protective mother of an autistic 6 year old who was illegally ripped from me by a corrupt judge in NJ, I found your segment to be disturbingly bias against women and dangerous to the public’s perception of the reality of what is really happened.   The fact that 20/20 decided to purposely omit evidence showing abuse that was provided to you and the reporters was deliberate manipulation of the truth.

The Women’s Coalition has been documenting this crisis on social media and Youtube and with the UN and Women’s Commissions.  We have a huge following and a strong social media presence.

We hope you correct this episode and do a follow-up showing the additional evidence of abuse.  As it stands right now, you have turned women, mothers and children off to your show by your gross misrepresentation and we have instructed all of our supporters to never to grant an exclusive or any type of interview to ABC and especially not to 20/20

I personally have an exclusive story coming out on one of the big networks in the next few weeks.  I will make sure that when my story becomes of further public interest that I will not speak to any reporters from ABC news.  You have lost the trust of abused mothers and children everywhere.

It is a travesty to harm women and children the way your show did.   You should be greatly ashamed.

Thank you for your time,

Rachel Alintoff

The short clip below is footage of 20/20 producers Beth Mullen and Sean Dooley reviewing documents and watching video of the Civil Rights Case Against Judge David Knutson at Attorney Michelle MacDonald’s office.

Lea Dannewitz discusses the judges court order to remove her blog Carver County Corruption from the internet. She did not remove it in 2014, but did in 2016. Facing potential civil litigation in Rucki case, owner deletes blog

What’s interesting is that any Carver County Corruption links that are still out there go directly to Michael Brodkorb’s Missing in Minnesota fake news blog.  Check it out → 3/14/2013 post from the blog Carver County Corruption

I received a similar letter in an attempt to intimidate me into deleting this blog and to coerce me into changing my testimony in Sandra Grazzini-Ruckci’s trial. I currently have numerous charges against me for exercising my first amendment right to free speech on this blog. Criminalizing noncriminal behavior while ignoring true crirme is the modus operandi in Dakota County.

Watch video in its entirety below




But She Looks So Sweet

20/20 Denial of Substantiating Documents in the Grazzini-Rucki Case

20/20 Denial of Substantiating Documents in the Grazzini-Rucki Case

20/20 B Roll Footage of Documents in the Grazzini-Rucki Case

Elizabeth Vargas, “We have searched for any of the documentation that you assured us existed to corroborate what you’re telling us and we can find none of it.”

More media collusion below:


DECEMBER 31, 2017BY 


Wikileaks has been a thorn in the side of the powerful for over a decade, and overnight, they proved exactly why.

On Saturday, the New York Times published a story with the title “Republican Attacks on Mueller and F.B.I. Open New Rift in G.O.P.,” and apparently Wikileaks’ founder Julian Assange wasn’t too happy about it. So early this morning, he used the official Wikileaks account to expose even more corruption within Obama’s administration as well as expose a member of the “legacy” media’s collusion with the government to deceive the public at-large.

The tweet revealed that a reporter for the Times used to give the State Department, which was headed by Hillary Clinton at the time, email updates of the investigative stories it was going to be publishing…days before the stories ever made it to print. The emails were ostensibly to give Clinton and her agency time to come up with a narrative to defend against the reports, which were problematic for the administration, or to create some sort of diversion on the day the story dropped so that the public was distracted.

That sounds incredibly familiar, does it not?

Check it out:

“Email shows New York Times handed over Cablegate’s publication schedule to the US government (without telling @WikiLeaks) giving the State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, up to 9 days in advance to spin the revelations or create diversions.”

Email shows New York Times handed over Cablegate’s publication schedule to the US government (without telling @WikiLeaks) giving the State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, up to 9 days in advance to spin the revelations or create diversions. 

The Daily Wire has more on the people in the email chain:

The players in the WikiLeaks email are interesting. Scott Shane is the national security reporter for The Times. And the recipient of his email, Philip Crowley, was at the time the United States Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs under Clinton’s State Department.

As 2017 comes to an end, its clear the Clinton scandals won’t go away any time soon.

Indeed, they won’t be. We previously reported that thousands of emails from Anthony Weiner’s laptop were released by the government just days ago, many of which contained classified information. The release of the emails was labeled a “major victory” by Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“Judicial Watch has forced the State Department to finally allow Americans to see these public documents,” Fitton said. “That these government docs were on Anthony Weiner’s laptop dramatically illustrates the need for the Justice Department to finally do a serious investigation of Hillary Clinton’s and Huma Abedin’s obvious violations of law.”

So really, if anyone is looking for any sort of collusion, they need to look no further than the mainstream media and Hillary Clinton, because there’s more than enough evidence they worked together to keep the public in the dark about a wide range of issues.

If you enjoyed this story, be sure to follow Sean Brown on Facebook!



FOLLOW us on Facebook at Nation In Distress!

Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter

Beaten Before Born: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Assaulted While Pregnant – Rucki Wanted to Kill Baby Because He “Wasn’t Perfect”

David Rucki is so violent, and so abusive that he beat ex-wife Sandra Grazzini-Rucki while pregnant, and assaulted his unborn before the child even took his first breath. As a result of the beating, the child was born prematurely (and suffers with permanent health problems).

This, according to, statements Sandra Grazzini-Rucki made during a heart-wrenching episode of Fighting B.A.C.K. (Aired: 6/19/2017) During the episode, Sandra also reveals that Rucki threatened to harm her children as a way to gain control over her through fear and intimidation.


The shocking revelation came when Sandra responded to a guest who was describing her own situation with domestic violence, and how her child was affected. The guest says her abusive ex used her child as a weapon, and would even retaliate by hurting the child, as a way to intimidate and control her. Sandra said that hearing the guest’s story reminded her of the violent marriage she escaped from.

The National Institutes of Health reports that over 300,000 pregnant women in the U.S. are victims to domestic violence, with domestic violence being the leading cause of death among U.S. women of childbearing age.

(Note: This article contains additional information on these incidents, as provided by a confidential source – which are told in the first person voice to illustrate Sandra’s horrifying experience, and told in this way raise awareness of the impact of domestic violence experienced during pregnancy)

Rucki’s Assault on an Unborn Baby: “I was kicked repeatedly in the stomach (because) he was ‘not a perfect child’…”

Imagine the horror Sandra surely experienced and felt:

Lying on a gurney, hands desperately clutch swollen belly, trying to hold back contractions… as she fades in and out of consciousness, she pleads,”No, no, it’s too soon…”

How would she explain the bruises this time? The violent assault against her unborn left her belly black and blue, bleeding on the inside… she realized too late that she married a demon in the flesh. Raging he stood over her kicking again and again… spit flying from his mouth as he screamed and swore..

Loud voice, someone shouting her name… she screamed and threw her arms out… The beep-beep of a fetal monitor going wild… She struggled to open her eyes, not comprehending, plastic IV tubing twisting as she fought… frightened by the sound of her name being called. Was she safe?

Signs of life.. a faint and erratic heart beat … tiny, seashell shaped knees raised to chest then violently kick out… Even the hospital could not protect her once he realized the baby he tried to kill was now fighting back.

(28:21) Sandra says: “When my youngest child was born, he (David Rucki) was under the belief that this was not going to be a ‘perfect child’ when I was kicked repeatedly into the stomach and went into pre-term labor, and gave birth, and he (Rucki) said, I want him gone rather than have a kid that’s not perfect because it’s more about me than it is about him…”

The child has been permanently affected by the assault inflicted on him while in the womb, and will suffer with lifelong health issues.

Rucki Threatens to Chop Baby Up in a Ceiling Fan

All she wanted was to be a wife and mother, to have a home filled with laughter and children. Instead the children tip-toed through the rooms like ghosts – vainly trying to remain silent and unseen, as if they could avoid their father’s rage.

The children… where were the children? So much they should not see… the violence, the tears… the fake apologies… Hiding somewhere in the house. Hands slammed over their small ears. Tears filling their eyes. They feared not the mythical monster in the closet that most children imagine but the very real monster in the house, their father.

(28:06) Sandra says: “When my oldest child was 3 months old, my ex-husband David Rucki grabbed him from the bassinet, held him up to a ceiling fan and said, ‘You will do as I say or he is going into the fan…’”

(29:03) Sandra says: “Sometimes when you talk about things it reminds me of things that David Rucki did and yet these are the men that have our children… You talk about this and I know, I will never forget when David held the baby up to the ceiling fan and said ‘You do what I say or he’s (chokes on words) .. they have no concern for the child, it’s more of a control issue…”

Rucki Promised to Change But Then Threatened to Kill Sandra, and the Children

Runaway Rucki Teen, G.R. also stated,…He showed anger like, ‘I’m going to kill you…’ “ (Social Service Report, November 2015:  Social Worker Recommended – Protective Care for Rucki Girls, Supervised Visits With Father Due to Safety Concerns

Sandra says during the marriage, Rucki repeatedly promised to change but always resorted back to his abusive behavior. Sandra says Rucki even threatened to kill “your children” if she did not comply with his demands.

Sandra says physical, mental and sexual abuse existed in the generations of the Rucki family and influenced David Rucki’s abusive behavior and attitude towards his own children. David Rucki promised Sandra that he would not abuse his own children the way he was abused by his father, and the way he witnessed his father abuse his sisters. Cut from the same fabric, David Rucki, in the end, turned out to be just as abusive, and dangerous to his own children as Fred Rucki was to him, and his sisters.

Family Court: The Two Options That Trap Victims of Domestic Violence

I think that is so sad that as a parent in an abusive relationship, why is it that your two options are: stay, being abused, have your child grow up in this environment filled with insecurities, tension and violence or leave and risk losing your child and continuing to suffer… – Comment from “Fighting Back” Guest, a Mother also involved in family court who lost custody of her baby to an alleged abuser

Sandra says that her children went to everyone asking for help and that every level of the system has failed to protect them.

Instead of protecting children, family court Judge David L Knutson, Dakota County, has assisted David Rucki in every step through the legal process to continue to abuse, torment and attempt to kill Sandra by making it impossible to survive. Judge Knutson has also endangered the lives of all 5 Rucki children by placing them under the care, custody and ultimately the control of David Rucki. Even as adults the Rucki children have been unable to escape their father and live independent lives of their own due to his violence against them.

For More Info on Grazzini-Rucki Case: Dakota County Corrupt Courthouse Event: Tour Infamous Court at Center of the Grazzini-Rucki Case

Originally Posted: Beaten Before Born


Preventing Blogging is Not a Governmental Interest.

For government to regulate speech, it must be “integral to criminal conduct.” United States v. Meredith, 685 F.3d 814, 819, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13012, 7, 2012-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,421, 110 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5157 (9th Cir. Cal. 2012) Typically, restriction of speech concerns a gang member not associating with other gang member; a child pornographer being monitored or restricted from the internet, defendant not speaking to victims, etc.. Speech is presumptively protected by the First Amendment. The burden is on the government to show that a defendant’s website is within one of the narrow categories of unprotected speech.

Suppressing speech rarely is justified by an interest in deterring criminal conduct, and in any event the justification “must be ‘far stronger than mere speculation about serious harms” and supported by “empirical evidence”

Protecting Reputation is Not a Government Interest.

If the Government were to say, ‘the families have been through enough and do not want to cause embarrassment or harm to their reputation’ – such would not be a proper Governmental interest. Specifically, protecting one’s reputation is not a governmental function unless it violates criminal law. 

Further, you have the right to attack people if you believe such behavior was unethical. See Wait v. Beck’s N. Am., Inc., 241 F. Supp. 2d 172, 183 (N.D.N.Y. 2003) (“[A s]tatement[] that someone has acted . . . unethically generally [is] constitutionally protected statements of opinion.”)

This is definitely vexatious litigation. Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender. Wikipedia

Anybody Sick Of This Yet???


One day before she is scheduled to appear at a court hearing on an Harassment Restraining Order filed against her, Dede Evavold has been caught lying in documents she submitted to a court in Dakota County.

Evavold has a court appearance tomorrow at the Dakota County Western Service Center in Apple Valley, for an evidentiary hearing on the Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) granted by a court in Dakota County.

In her Motion to Vacate the HRO filed with the court in Dakota County on Sunday, Evavold claimed she “filed a police report against David Rucki on 12/6/2017 with the Lakeville Police Dept…”   According to Evavold’s motion, she filed a police report against David Rucki for “falsely reporting a crime” committed by Evavold.

Year was bookended by big leadership changes in Lakeville

Jeffrey Long                    Lakeville Chief of Police

From: Dede Evavold []
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:35 PM
To: Long, Jeffrey <>; Dronen, James <>
Subject: Police Report

To: Jeff Long, Lakeville Police Dept. Police Chief Phone: (952) 985-2800 Email:
James Dronen, Lakeville Police Dept. (952) 985-2800 Email:
Lakeville Police Department
9237 183rd St W Lakeville, MN 55044
(952) 985-2800

Re: Falsely Reporting a Crime, Witness Tampering, Stalking, Harassment

Case #’s LA 17002499 and 17002613

On 7/26/2017, David Rucki filed a police report with Officer Ronald Hvinden indicating that Suspect Deirdre Evavold violated probation by posting public information online.

On 7/31/207 David Rucki was granted an Order for an Ex-Parte Harassment Restraining Order entered on July 28th, 2017 in Dakota Co. Court File No. 19AV-CV-17-1950.

On 8/04/2017 David Rucki filed a police report with Officer Ronald Hvinden indicating that Suspect Deirdre Evavold had violated the Harassment Restraining Order on 8/02/2017 and 8/03/2017 by posting public information online.

On 8/17/2017 David Rucki filed a police report with Officer Ronald Hvinden indicating that Suspect Deirdre Evavold had violated the Harassment Restraining Order on 8/15/2017 by posting public information online.

On 9/11/2017 Deirdre Evavold was charged with 3 counts of Violating a Restraining Order 609.748.6 (a) and 609.748.6 (b)

The basis of the HRO and HRO violation is blog posting with no threatening statements listed, no acts of harassment cited, and no proof that any posts constitute harassment or threats as defined by law.  David Rucki has falsely reported a crime and made material omissions and false claims of an immediate and present danger to get the malicious and capricious Ex-Parte HRO granted against me.

§609.505 Falsely reporting a Crime Subdivision 1. False reporting. Whoever informs a law enforcement officer that a crime has been committed or otherwise provides information to an on-duty peace officer, knowing that the person is a peace officer, regarding the conduct of others, knowing that it is false and intending that the officer shall act in reliance upon it, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A person who is convicted a second or subsequent time under this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

David Rucki also included his adult daughter Samantha Rucki as a petitioner on the Affidavit and Petition for Harassment Restraining Order with no police reports filed or signature of Samantha Rucki.

On June 7th, 2016, David Rucki engaged in witness tampering by harassing, threatening and intimidating me via the U.S. Mail in an attempt to alter my testimony in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s criminal case. (See Attached Hellmuth & Johnson extortion letter). David Rucki also coerced and intimidated his daughter Samantha Rucki into recanting her testimony for our criminal trials:


Q: Ok you are in a really tough spot and I totally understand that. Um no kid should ever have to be in this spot and you are in a tough one. But we are looking to see kind of what happened and how we got to this point. And l, my heart breaks for you Sam, it really does. Are you being forced to be here?

A: No but it’s definitely not on free will choice.

Q: Ok what do you mean by that?

A: They basically said I have to, and I have to be here and I have to recant everything I said and it’s gonna and that’s the way its gonna have to be and they made me feel really guilty about not doing it, I started crying

Q: Ok, who is they?

A: My dad and Tammy.

I filed a criminal complaint for witness tampering prior to my criminal trial with no action taken.

609.498 TAMPERING WITH WITNESS. Subdivision 1.Tampering with witness in the first degree. Whoever does any of the following is guilty of tampering with a witness in the first degree and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 1a:

(e) by means of force or threats of injury to any person or property, intentionally coerces or attempts to coerce a person to provide false information concerning a crime to law enforcement authorities;

(f) intentionally causes injury or threatens to cause injury to any person or property in RETALIATION against a person who has provided information to law enforcement authorities concerning a crime within a year of that person providing the information or within a year of the actor’s release from incarceration, whichever is later. (I was released from incarceration in January 2017).

Use with Stalking B. Influence/Tamper/Retaliate Juror/Judicial Proceeding/Officer Minnesota Offense Codes (MOC) Revised August 2010

David Rucki was able to harass and intimidate witnesses, interfere with the legal process and lie to law enforcement with impunity in our criminal trials and he continues to be allowed to do so.

The Lakeville Police Dept. is well aware of the fact that David Rucki has a well-documented history of coercion and intimidation and his five children, ex-wife, two neighbors and an in-law all successfully took out restraining orders against him. David Rucki also has a long history of violence including a bar fighta road rage incidentincidents of stalkingmultiple violations of restraining orders, and choking his wife.

609.749 STALKING As used in this section, “stalking” means to engage in conduct which the actor knows or has reason to know would cause the victim under the circumstances to feel frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated, and causes this reaction on the part of the victim regardless of the relationship between the actor and victim.

Directly or indirectly intending to injure the person, property, or rights of another. David Rucki filed a false personal injury case against me on 11/09/2017 in an attempt to extort further finances from my family.

David Rucki is using the criminal process for improper purposes and intentionally instituting and pursuing malicious legal actions against me. This is clear harassing and stalking behavior that is causing me to feel threatened and persecuted and I want this report filed to document the criminal activity of David Rucki.

Please send me a copy of the public portion of this incident report that includes the LA Case No.

Deirdre Evavold
3015 30th Street Ct. South
St. Cloud, MN 56301
(320) 293-6233

From: Long, Jeffrey []
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 9:41 AM
To: Dede Evavold <>; Dronen, James <>
Cc: Kornmann, John <>; Bastyr, Diane <>
Subject: Proper Venue

Good Morning,

Thank you for your email.

If you are feeling harassed, stalked and threatened, you should immediately contact your local law enforcement agency to file a report.

Lakeville is not the proper jurisdiction/venue to file your report. Any criminal charges would be initiated by your local law enforcement agency with their Prosecutor or County Attorney’s Office for your area. If your local agency has any questions of us, they will request that information directly. That agency will determine the direction of an investigation.

For any additional concerns or questions, you will need to speak with your local authorities and/or County Attorney’s Office.  I encourage you to call them directly versus emailing them information.

Most agencies, including Lakeville, do not accept reports via email.

From: Dede Evavold []
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:42 PM
To: Long, Jeffrey <>
Subject: RE: Proper Venue

Mr. Long,

I would like my response filed into David Rucki’s police report as a supplement to Case #’s LA 17002499 and 17002613. I’m reporting the crime of filing a false police report and his witness tampering which is Lakeville’s jurisdiction.

Deirdre Evavold
3015 30th Street Ct. South
St. Cloud, MN 56301
(320) 293-6233

From: Long, Jeffrey []
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 1:34 PM
To: Dede Evavold <>
Subject: RE: Proper Venue

Thank you for your reply.

If you feel you are the victim of a crime, your local law enforcement agency will initiate a report.

At their request, we will work with that agency to assist them with their investigation into these allegations. If we were to add a supplement to a case file, it would be based on the investigation of your home agency.

In order to initiate the process, I encourage you to contact your local authorities by phone, versus email.  The sooner you do so, the fewer delays you will have in any potential investigation.

%d bloggers like this: