Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

Yellow Journalism

WHAT DO BRIAN STELTER, MICHAEL WOLFF AND MICHAEL BRODKORB ALL HAVE IN COMMON?

THEY ALL PRACTICE YELLOW JOURNALISM AND HAVE ALL SOLD THEIR SOULS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:  Yellow journalism, or the yellow press, is a US term for a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers. Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering or sensationalism. By extension, the term yellow journalism is used today as a pejorative to decry any journalism that treats news in an unprofessional or unethical fashion.

 

MICHAEL WOLFF

Michael Wolff is the author of the controversial book that is highly critical of President Trump’s first year in the White House and says his book shows Donald Trump is unfit for the job. Wolff claims his revelations will eventually “bring down” the US President.

 

 

BRIAN STELTER

Fake news: CNN’s Brian Stelter doesn’t recognize his OWN words of caution about ‘Fire and Fury’ author

Posted at 7:07 pm on January 6, 2018 by Brett T.

As Twitchy has reported, CNN’s Brian Stelter has been instrumental in keeping the narrative about President Trump’s mental fitness alive this week, but we can’t help but question his memory after the GOP sent out this tweet about author Michael Wolff’s “Fire and Fury”:


Continue Reading: https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/01/06/fake-news-cnns-brian-stelter-doesnt-recognize-his-own-words-of-caution-about-fire-and-fury-author/

MICHAEL BRODKORB

Michael Brodkorb founded Misisng In Minnesota in July 2016. Brodkorb states that Missing In Minnesota provides detailed news, analysis, and commentary on the continuing developments involving the Grazzini-Rucki case.

Allison Mann

Allison Mann

 

In May 2017, Missing in Minnesota announced the addition of Allison Mann as a contributing author. Mann is a paralegal with Elliott Law Office and lives in Lakeville, Minnesota with her husband and family.

“Elliott Law Offices provides legal services to David Rucki and his family, but Elliott Law Office is not affiliated with Missing in Minnesota” ~Michael Brodkorb

 

Order for Continuance

If you are served with a restraining order, you have the right to a hearing to contest the order, present evidence, testify, and cross examine witnesses. The judge must find that you caused or attempted to cause physical harm, or that you put someone in fear of imminent serious physical harm, or that you caused someone to have sexual relations with you by using force, threat or duress. If none of these standards are met, the judge should not issue a restraining order against you. You may remember that an ex-parte temporary restraining order was granted by Judge Karen Asphaug in July of 2017.

Judge Philip Kanning is a retired judge that is assigned to my civil harassment case. Kanning was also involved in the Grazzini-Rucki marital dissolution.

Date Submitted: 4/27/2015 4:17:01 PM
Case Style: In the Marriage of SANDRA SUE GRAZZINI-RUCKI vs DAVID VICTOR RUCKI *** Judge Kanning Assigned ***
Filing Code: Service Only

Judge Michael Mayer is assigned to my HRO violation criminal case. He was the judge that was on the welfare case of the girls after they were found in November 2015 and had them sent to California for reunification with their father.

Judge Apshaug is assigned to my probation violation case. As most of you are aware, she is the judge that presided over all 4 of our criminal trials.

If a judge is aware of circumstances that could cause his impartiality to be questioned, the judge is supposed to disclose them for the record. It’s not surprising that this didn’t happen in my case and it’s not surprising that the malicious and baseless litigation is continuing to move forward.Brodkorb will report the false updates on this case, so stay tuned for updates from reliable sources.


RELATED

The Revolving Door of Convoluted Court Hearings

When We Lose Free Speech-We Lose Everything

Advertisements

NEVER TALK TO POLICE

Law Professor James Duane gives viewers startling reasons why they should always exercise their 5th Amendment rights when questioned by government officials.

Ray Man
Awesome video, everyone should watch this. Thanks!
Jim Foreman
The military teaches the only thing that one is required to tell; Name, rank and serial number; NO MORE!
Zeke Man
Cops are not your friends
The Traveler
I’ve watched it a few times over the past couple of years and it is A MUST WATCH!
jbe162
Hey…..Norfolk! My hometown.
ukfan4sure1
This was amazing. I always thought that if I had nothing to hide (which I don’t), that the police would be my advocate. I see how wrong I was.
TIME TO STAND
sorry… I’m so late.. Silent Citizen told me about this one
Robert Dailey
If you have trouble exercising your right to remain silent, this is worth watching and paying attention.
RICHY MARK NORMAN
I would love to know how many innocent people in American history have been executed.
Guy Goodwin
One of the most informative presentations I have ever seen on the Internet. Proves all this time on line isn’t wasted.
Michael Chevreaux
ANYTHING can and will be used against you in a court og law!
Daymond ' Chief ' Jones
yep sovereign church of Jesus com
StormWolf01
I knew people shouldn’t talk to cops, but i didn’t know how even stating the truth could lead to problems. I won’t forget that, if i am one day “interviewed” by the police.
laughingcoyote111
I saw this quite a while ago, but I’m glad to see it’s still going around. Everyone should see this.
Richard Brown
Silence is “Golden” nothing else worth adding!
Gideon Jussen
Lol 47:03 I never try and send innocent people to jail. At the start he saying, everyone breaks the law. So maybe true he not trying to send innocent people to jail. Seeing noone is innocent, he trys to send everyone to jail.
Terry Weaver
The 5th amendment affords us the right to NOT incriminate our self. Police however, use the person’s 5th amendment right to mean, if they are not talking they must then be guilty. “To protect and to serve” this has been posted on most cop cars until recently. The problem is: who are they protecting and who are they serving? That answer is. They protect sand serve the government, not the citizen. The Miranda right…anything you say can and will be used against you!!! Why is there no protection for YOU? It is onesided, designed only to help convict you. Why does it not read: can be used for or against you. Last but not least… When entering a plea the courts documents have guilty or not guilty… Innocent is not an acceptable plea and so, even this subtle insinuation is designed to adversely effect you!
Brian
ive watched this video so many times. lol
Jammer / San Antonio
SAEXTAZYPREZ. I’m not sure where you got this video but it was awesome, except that guy talked fast as shit….. I will have to watch it again several more times to catch all he was saying but I took away a lot of great info from it… I see in your videos where the cops come up to you asking if they can help you with anything , you say no and they keep digging to get you talking. And when you say I’m taking the 5th and they say you can’t because you are not under arrest yet. You have to be arrested to plead the 5th. People fall for that line too. Great video hope you put out more or at least share where you got it for those of us that can’t afford to donate.
Commenter Five
Notice the policeman said they are allowed to lie in an interrogation. Even their name for it is a lie. Rest assured the biggest liars in your vicinity are two groups, the people and the police.
Crow T Robot's Video Channel
Yeah, I saw this video the other day. It’s one thing when a lawyer tells you not to talk to the police. But when a police officer says it – LISTEN TO HIM!!!
zelen plav
My granddaughter found out the police are major liers. I understand it is the SYSTEM. But it creates so many problems even for normal law abiding citizens. My father was a military officer. It took him decades to fully realize how corrupt this system is. I can’t blame the individual officers, they are victims of the system too.
Kim Pierre
Good tutorial, excellent advice
Freedom Capital Partners LLP
Cops are not your friends
Silent Citizen
If every American watched this and took it to heart, our society would be so much different. Great video.
1960ARC
Good way to get arrested for nothing. Someone walked out in front of my car, he fell to the ground, I was going very slowly. When the police arrived I told them what happened, he was taken away with a broken hip in an ambulance. If I had refused to talk, would I have just driven home?. I don’t think so. I went to see this poor old guy in hospital that evening. He told me I had stopped really fast, had not hit him, but he lost his balance and fell against my car and then the ground braking his hip. Lucky for me he turned out to be a really nice honest guy.
Klaus S
Yep, happened to me! A little noisy confrontation with my wife inside my house about a notebook that needed to be returned to the shop (was a loaner) was misunderstand by a Spanish speaking nurse who called police. I was questioned in my store because I left my house to go to work (without the notebook loaner). I was very nice to police and told them the story but he arrested me for home-violence! All cleared up after some days and I was NOT charged with anything – I will NEVER volunteer information anymore! I cannot think what can happen in a serious case!
jaschu09
One of my first lectures I watched on youtube. Great material.

NO HEARING FOR YOU!

Preventing Blogging is Not a Governmental Interest.

For government to regulate speech, it must be “integral to criminal conduct.” United States v. Meredith, 685 F.3d 814, 819, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13012, 7, 2012-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,421, 110 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5157 (9th Cir. Cal. 2012) Typically, restriction of speech concerns a gang member not associating with other gang member; a child pornographer being monitored or restricted from the internet, defendant not speaking to victims, etc.. Speech is presumptively protected by the First Amendment. The burden is on the government to show that a defendant’s website is within one of the narrow categories of unprotected speech.

Suppressing speech rarely is justified by an interest in deterring criminal conduct, and in any event the justification “must be ‘far stronger than mere speculation about serious harms” and supported by “empirical evidence”

Protecting Reputation is Not a Government Interest.

If the Government were to say, ‘the families have been through enough and do not want to cause embarrassment or harm to their reputation’ – such would not be a proper Governmental interest. Specifically, protecting one’s reputation is not a governmental function unless it violates criminal law. 

Further, you have the right to attack people if you believe such behavior was unethical. See Wait v. Beck’s N. Am., Inc., 241 F. Supp. 2d 172, 183 (N.D.N.Y. 2003) (“[A s]tatement[] that someone has acted . . . unethically generally [is] constitutionally protected statements of opinion.”)

This is definitely vexatious litigation. Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender. Wikipedia

Michael Cindy Bradykorb Can’t Read Court Documents

Missing in Minnesota

Missing in Minnesota

UPDATE: Dede Evavold loses appeal of her criminal conviction

The Clerk of Appellate Courts has rejected Dede Evavold’s petition for review to the Minnesota Supreme Court because Evavold’s petition was not properly filed.

 

MN Supreme Court Petition for Review

Appeal 2017

Reply Brief Evavold

Evavold HRO Is Harassment: Judge Asphaug has History of Suppressing Evidence on Behalf of Applicant

The Down and Dirty in Dakota County on the Fraudulent HRO filed Against Dede Evavold

Fraudulent Harassment Restraining Order filed against Dede Evavold, co-defendant in Grazzini-Rucki criminal trial, on July 28, 2017. HRO fails to prove any harassment or threat actually happened, fails to meet legal standard of harassment.

HRO petition includes many procedural errors, and should not have been approved. To proceed with the HRO creates a due process violation, and does not respect the legal rights of Dede Evavold.

The HRO was signed, and approved by Judge Karen Asphaug, who presided over all 4 trials of the co-defendants in the Grazzini-Rucki criminal case and has been described as being the “personal judge” of the applicant filing for the HRO, David Rucki.

Judge Karen Asphaug (Twitter)

Judge Asphaug has a history of covering up the violent and criminal history of applicant, Rucki – and this fraudulent HRO is just another example of that.

For example – During the criminal trial of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, Judge Asphaug suppressed any mention of Rucki’s violent and criminal history; when Sandra testified at her trial she wasn’t even allowed to allude to the restraining order she and her children received against him. During the same trial, Judge Asphaug suppressed the Rucki social service records documenting a history of abuse allegations the children raised against their father.

Further, Judge Asphaug ruled to disallow nearly all of Rucki’s criminal history and forced Gina Dahlen to testify in multiple trials even though she was a defendant still awaiting her trial. (Read More: Beware, the next blog post may be a threat to someone’s safety by Michael Volpe)

And now, shocking revelations from the largely redacted evidence that Dede Evavold received, as part of her case, reveal that Dakota County is issuing a probation violation against her, and threatening  jail, when there is no proof to suggest that she did anything wrong..

“7/19/2017, Gilbertsen, John P: “I was able to locate a speicif article reference by the victim (David Rucki) and it did contain information and commentary on the victim(s), much what was negative and sensationalistic in nature. However, I was unable to determine who in fact runs the blog, as the postings are under Aliases which do not clearly identify the person posting…

And,“When I reported back to Supervisor Griffin I indicated I did not feel there was information that we could glean that make it clear Ms. Evavold is the writer or runs the blog..”

Based on this evidence alone, ALL charges against Dede Evavold in this fraudulent HRO, and alleged probation violation, should be immediately dropped – there is no evidence of harassment, and no evidence that she is responsible for the posts in question.

So why is Judge Asphaug, and Dakota County pursuing this HRO against Evavold?

It is obvious that the purpose of this HRO is to suppress public scrutiny, and end all discussion on the Grazzini-Rucki family court and criminal cases. And the  Chaos and horror after courts step in for Rucki family. Dede Evavold is being used as a scapegoat so that by threatening her with jail, fines, stripping her of Freedom of Speech and threatening other legal action sends a strong message to deter those supporting Sandra Grazzini-Rucki or Dede Evavold, or deter those speaking out about this case. This protects Judge Asphaug from being exposed for her actions during all 4 trials of the Grazzini-Rucki co-defendants, where she violated numerous laws, violated the Constitutional rights of all 4 defendants, demonstrated bias and acted with outrageous abuses of judicial power.

This fraudulent HRO is an abuse of the legal, and serves only to harass Dede Evavold – that the case would proceed this far shows just how lawless the courts in Dakota County really are.

 

SHOCKER!

It came as no surprise that the MN Court of Appeals rubber stamped the decision of the Dakota County District Court in my case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State of Minnesota vs Deirdre Elise Evavold.

Criminal appeals are handled by a battery of anonymous law clerks who know that they have to uphold the conviction no matter what. They write memos for the judges that are mostly if not entirely based on the prosecution brief and they draft the  decisions affirming the conviction.

The opinion affirmed the fact that illegally withholding and suppressing evidence, witness tampering, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, obstruction of justice and trial by ambush is perfectly acceptable, and in fact, encouraged.

Gallery For > Courtroom Lawyer Cartoon

Remember, a jury verdict is only as fair as the trial, and in this case as well as the companion cases, a fair trial or appeal was never going to happen!

The tragic reality is that you can be a law abiding citizen and have your freedom and rights taken away under the current  system. The bright side is that many people are waking up and when you’re aware of the operation you can defeat it!

 

 

Comment on Corruption of the judiciary: Where do we go for help?

Tru Tuoneself
Oct 19, 2016 @ 09:28:08

I was a lawyer, fought judicial corruption in three Texas Counties and at the highest levels of government. I am no longer a lawyer. We are well beyond citing proper law my friends. I investigated, documented and testified in state courts, appellate courts, the Texas Supreme Court, regarding the corruption and I am an expert on recognizing and documenting corruption. What I can tell you is we are at war my fellow commoners, at war! The enemy is just not coming to our shores with tanks and planes, but surreptitiously has taken over our government, one office at a time, one judge position at a time, one court clerk position at a time and it is only going to get far worse, before it gets better. When someone is overly arrogant and seems not worried about the courts or law enforcement, you will know why soon enough. The arrogance gives it away and the refusal and disrespect for the law does as well. They will not enforce the laws, investigate or prosecute and they will continue to permit the pillaging, while slowly changing the laws till we all find ourselves in Nazi America. Drastic times require drastic measures. See you on the front lines.

Coming After Us Six Ways from Sunday

Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Logo | Spivak ... Founders_Finger_Gulag

Re: Andy Ostrowski’s false psych hold and a most curious comment

Subject: Re: Andy Ostrowski — recent comment on post
Date: Oct 9, 2017 10:49 AM
JoAnne is absolutely correct in her posts.
The Americans with Disabilities Act, confirms the RULE OF LAW and the Constitution. In order for any involuntary incarceration under the 5th and 14th Amendments DUE PROCESS must be strictly observed.  All that this requires is NOTICE AND HEARING.  There is a District Court case in Wisconsin that suggests that in this regard Form TRUMPS Substance, and a totally biased finder of fact still meets the criteria.  However, this was not the situation!
An ex-parte commitment order to be enforced by Police Act is so wrong that it is a massive stretch for any policeman participating to not be legally and criminally culpable for any action on his part that interferes with the civil rights of a victim – in this case Andy.   (The fact that Andy may have given his key to someone is irrelevant – and the fact that he might have on social media made statements that were offensive to someone are not grounds for summary incarceration.  THIS IS NOT ALLOWABLE under the Constitution and ANY LAW THAT IS or is interpreted to deny basic DUE PROCESS is void.   A middle school student is required to know this fact – to require a well paid judge/lawyer/policeman to be aware of such a proposition is equally appropriate.
I agree with JoAnne — ANDY’s incarceration was WRONGFUL, and criminal.    All the miscreants involved ought to be charged with KIDNAPPING, tried and sent to jail!   The Gulag cannot be tolerated in America.
Ken Ditkowsky
 Continue Reading: https://marygsykes.com/2017/10/09/re-andy-ostrowskis-false-psych-hold-and-a-most-curious-comment/
%d bloggers like this: