Someone Needs to Get Michael Brodkorb a Ticket to Shutty Town

Presstitute Michael Brodkorb strikes again! This time he is attacking AJ Kern, a 2018 Republican candidate seeking election to the U.S. House to represent the 6th Congressional District of Minnesota. (More on this after a review of Brodkorb).

Michael Brodkorb has an extensive history of attacking reputations under the guise of journalism and has consistently tailored his “news” to suit whoever is willing to pay him.

Brodkorb has a troubled past with a long history of out of control behavior – a domestic violence incident involving his wife, a sexual fling with Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch that ended his political career, and driving while intoxicated, crashed his car and nearly killed himself. In another embarrassment, in 2011, Brodkorb made secret recordings of conversations with his GOP bosses regarding his firing (after his tryst with Amy Koch was exposed) . The recordings revealed, among other things, that Brodkorb was struggling with his mental health – which could explain his erratic behavior.

Brodkorb also has a reputation for inciting fights within ranks of the Republican party, among his own team , where he was known for screaming fits and personal attacks against others, it said his eruptions could leave fear in his wake..” (The Fall of Michael Brodkorb) Another Republican, retired Army Lt. Col. Joe Repya, described Brodkorb as “a ‘thug’ with ‘an intimidating personality’ who ran roughshod over party members, elected officials and even volunteers…’You have to understand how frightened people within the party became of Michael Brodkorb..’” (Michael Brodkorb: Admired, feared and, above all, Republican

Brodkorb has also been described as “always pushing the limits..” Brodkorb, once one of the most powerful people in the Senate, used his political knowledge and connections as ammo in carefully crafted blogs designed to attack political targets.Democrats denounced Brodkorb as a “Republican operative” paid to write hit pieces on their candidates. For his work, Brodkorb was paid very well. Initially Brodkorb began blogging anonymously on Minnesota Democrats Exposed (created in 2004) but in a fit of rage, he accidentally exposed his identity while posting online, and reluctantly, was forced to admit to his clandestine activities. Brodkorb says about MDE,”When you’re writing Minnesota Democrats Exposed you’re waking up every day and looking for a target. Even though that kind of thing drives traffic, it’s not a very fulfilling way to write...” (I’m done with partisan politics’: a Q&A with Michael Brodkorb) Due to the insulting content of MDE, Brodkorb was sued for libel – dismissed by a court in 2007. Complaints continued to be raised aganstBrodkorb to this day. (Michael Brodkorb Exposed: “Search and Destroy” Blogger)

Recently, Brodkorb was sued for defamation by Attorney Michelle MacDonald who is running for MN Supreme Court. Read more here: Michael Brodkorb Sued for Fake News

Below is the most recent attack on me via AJ Kern.

Michael Brodkorb fails to mention that I am a falsely convicted felon and that I was charged with “Parental Deprivation” for protecting children under §609.26 DEPRIVING ANOTHER OF CUSTODIAL OR PARENTAL RIGHTS.

Subdivision 1.Prohibited acts.  Whoever intentionally does any of the following acts may be charged with a felony and, upon conviction, may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 6: (1) conceals a minor child from the child’s parent where the action manifests an intent substantially to deprive that parent of parental rights or conceals a minor child from another person having the right to parenting time or custody where the action manifests an intent to substantially deprive that person of rights to parenting time or custody;

This is not a crime when a person charged under subdivision 1 proves that: (1) the person reasonably believed the action taken was necessary to protect the child from physical or sexual assault or substantial emotional harm. That’s impossible to prove however, when evidence is illegally withheld and suppressed in the criminal trial.

Oh and by the way, I was also falsely imprisoned for 4 mos. due to my political beliefs and actions I have taken to expose the extensive corruption in the courts.

At my sentencing hearing, (and speaking on behalf of the state) Assistant County Attorney Keena states,“As to the sentence that the State believes the defendant should receive in this case, it’s the State’s position that Ms. Evavold should be treated the same and receive the same sentence that xxxxxx  received in her case. And why she remained silent and her rationale for doing so I think is more reprehensible than actions taken by xxxxxx. This defendant did it purposely for her ideological beliefs about the family court system and her complete disregard for the family court system.” 

I am not at liberty to discuss the background on the case as I have been gagged by the judges involved and risk further incarceration for revealing details of this high profile case. What this amounts to is a weaponization of the legal system to bully and suppress my first amendment rights.

Here’s what I can say, the Assistant Dakota County Attorney engaged in malicious and retaliatory prosecution by unrealistically overcharging defendants and allowing wrongful convictions when she knew the affirmative defense negated any criminal liability. The judge erroneously allowed evidence to be illegally withheld from defendants and excluded evidence critical to the affirmative defense, thereby making the affirmative defense ineffective. Evidentiary rules cannot prevent a defendant from presenting his defense. Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S.284 (1972).

Read blog posts below to understand more about the witch hunt being carried out by Dakota County against myself and others involved in the court system.




Tom Emmer

Below are emails between myself and Rhonda Sivarajah who was a 2014 candidate for Minnesota’s Sixth District Congressional seat. Emmer knew about the corruption in the courts and many mothers that had their children wrongfully taken from them by the courts talked to him at a fundraiser at Ernie Leidiger’s. Emmer told them that if he got elected, he would address these issues. (Or not!)

—–Original Message—–
From: Dede Evavold <>
Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2014 1:07 PM
To: Rhonda Sivarajah <>
Subject: Meeting

Hi Rhonda,

Tom Emmer has obviously heard that we are wanting candidates to use legal reform as their platform. He and others are now contacting Bonnie Roy to seek support for his campaign as he is realizing that this could be beneficial for him.

Bonnie and I would like to meet with you and Marty Seifert to discuss strategies to move this forward. As much as we need exposure of the issues, we do not want to have someone use this for their personal gain only.

Also, who do you think would want to join from the republicans running against Al Franken

Thanks Rhonda,



From: Rhonda Sivarajah <>
Date: February 9, 2014 at 2:13:54 PM CST
To: Dede Evavold <>
Subject: Re: Meeting

He is such a snake. Doesn’t care about anyone but himself. Spoke with Marty and told him to meet with you. Have also been talking to legislators. Chris Dahlberg is a county commissioner so may actually understand the issue.

Tom Emmer has clearly demonstrated that protecting children and families is not a high priority and that he would rather be a part of Pay to Play Politics with the big boys in Washington.

Tom Emmer has shown his true colors and there should be no doubt that AJ Kern is the right choice to represent Minnesota’s Sixth Congressional District.



Michael Brodkorb Sued for Fake News

On JUNE 29, 2018, Michael Brodkorb wrote a piece titled “Michelle MacDonald being investigated by lawyers board.”  He reported  that the investigation was opened after he filed a formal complaint with the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility. This was filed last week due to what Brodkorb and his attorney Nathan Hansen have determined is a “frivolous and vexatious” lawsuit filed against him by Michelle MacDonald. (Apparently, just saying it makes it true so there’s nothing to see here.)

Brodkorb also states that MacDonald is prohibited from engaging in “the solo practice of law,” and she must “work in a setting where she is in daily contact with, and under the direct supervision of another Minnesota licensed attorney.” (She has an established law firm and is under the supervision of an attorney. I’ll review why later in this post.)

Brodkorb’s attorney also filed a Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions in Dakota County and Ramsey County for filing the same lawsuit in two counties. The lawsuit was accidentally e-filed in Dakota County and never should have been accepted as it was captioned Ramsey County. This was immediately correctly e-filed in Ramsey County and Ramsey County states, “Venue is thus proper in this district pursuant to MN Statutes 542.09 because the cause of action, or some part of it, arose in Ramsey County, MN.” (Clearly, Brodkorb wants the defamation lawsuit dismissed, but if it goes forward, he wants it in Dakota County as this will ensure a win for him.)

Attorney Nathan Hansen also wrote, “The safeguards set forth in the Order of the Minnesota Supreme Court relating to her practice of law have been ignored by Ms. MacDonald and her cohorts.” (Exactly who are the cohorts?) 

I filed a complaint prior to my criminal trial with the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility in March 2016, against Dakota Co. Attorneys: James Backstrom, Philip Prokopowicz and Kathryn Keena for illegally withholding my evidence and readily available, free, electronic, data in violation of the Minnesota Government data practice act (Chapter 13.09). I also filed a criminal complaint with Bryan Schafer, Hastings Chief of Police due to misconduct of a public official (Chapter 609.43(1)). The criminal complaint was ignored and I received the response below from the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility immediately after filing the complaint.

Michael Brodkorb received this response from the Board. ↓

This was a complaint that was filed against Judge David Knutson with the Board on Judicial Standards. “Your complaint required no further action.”

Over the years, numerous clients from different counties have filed with the Board on Judicial Standards and the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility on Attorneys and Judges with no action taken. Apparently the Boards tolerate attorneys’ and judges’ abuse of authority and ethics, prejudicial misconduct, acting with malice, coercion and threats, obstruction of justice, failure to follow the law, illegal withholding of evidence, witness tampering, abuse of discretion, unjustifiable delays and securing exorbitant fees.


What the Boards won’t tolerate is being pro-liberty, pro-constitution, pro-human and civil rights, and pro-law and order. For that, you will be punished severely!

In MacDonald’s disciplinary case, she asserted that the first amendment prohibits disciplining her on the basis of her communications about a judge, because the communications did not make or imply false statements of fact, and because the Director’s claim of wrongdoing was not proved at a hearing due to the high burdenof “clear and convincing evidence” which must be established in every case.

Letters to Board of Judicial Standards about Judge Knutson
On December 26, 2013, MacDonald wrote a letter to the Board on Judicial Standards to complain about Judge David Knutson, a state agency that responds to complaints about state court Judges who violate the Judicial Code of Conduct, of which Judge Knutson was a member.

In her December 26, 2013 letter she complained about “ongoing retaliation” against herself and her client, warranting investigation.” She alleged “evidence of improper case assignments “, “usurping of court files”, and failing to report or involve the juvenile court and child protection improper assignments, and usurping of files by Judge Knutson.

On March 11, 2014, she reported that “the retaliation against myself and my client has been continuous, and is overwhelming.”

On November 15, 2016, an evidentiary hearing took place before a Referee appointed by the Minnesota Supreme Court, where Judge Knutson and Ms. MacDonald testified.

On January 3, 2017, the Referee issued findings and recommendation, and adopted almost all of the Director’s proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations nearly verbatim.
The Referee found that Ms. MacDonald violated Rule 8 (a) by making made false statements in reckless disregard for the truth concerning the integrity of the judge as follows:

  • Respondent’s statement regarding Judge Knutson’s lack of impartiality “since day one” was false and made in reckless disregard of the truth.”
  • The “factual allegations” within the federal lawsuit were, in part, false and made with reckless disregard as to their truth or falsity.
  • The Referee found also that “The letters to the BJS include the same complaints made within the federal lawsuit.
  • As with the federal lawsuit, Respondent’s statements were false and made with a reckless disregard as to their truth or falsity.”
  • And finally, the referee writes: “Respondent’s on-going statements and “factual allegations” within the federal lawsuit’s Amended Complaint were false and in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity.”
  • Consequently, in a conclusion of law, the Referee claims in conclusion: “The Director has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent’s false statements made with reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of those statements about Judge Knutson’s impartiality and integrity in multiple forums violated Rule 8.2(a) (MRPC) and Rule 8.4(d) (MRPC) “(82a)

The federal district court dismissed all of the claims in the complaint, describing them as “futile” and noting that “nothing in the record supports the[m].”

When asked at the disciplinary hearing about the basis for her allegations, MacDonald responded, “[t]he
record speaks for itself.”

The referee concluded that MacDonald violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.1, 8.2(a), and 8.4(d) by making recklessly false allegations against the judge that no reasonable attorney would have made based on the evidence available. (7a).

The Court cited the letters to the Board on Judicial Standards, finding that she violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.2(a):
“In addition to filing a federal lawsuit against the district judge in her client’s case, MacDonald wrote a letter to the Board on Judicial Standards complaining about the judge’s behavior and asserting that he had acted unethically during
her client’s trial. In total, she wrote four letters to the Board, each impugning the judge’s integrity and repeating the allegations from the federal lawsuit. She sent copies of these letters to numerous elected officials and made similar
remarks in letters to other attorneys. The referee concluded that MacDonald’s statements were false, made with reckless disregard for the truth, and violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.2(a) and 8.4(d). (7a)”

Attorney Michelle MacDonald has been politically targeted for suing a judge and running for MN Supreme Court in the 2014, 2016, and upcoming 2018 election. 

Clearly when something cannot be argued on merit, logic, facts or reason, demonizing, discrediting, deceiving, discounting and dividing tactics are used instead. The establishment and Brodkorb use these tactics continually.

Weaponized Information    

Weaponized information is a message or content piece that is designed to affect the recipient’s perception about something or someone in a way that is not warranted. The term implies a target and the intention to cause harm.

The goal of weaponized information is bringing about a change in beliefs and attitudes and, as a result, promote behavior that serves the attacker’s purpose.

Weaponized information often consists of intentional falsehoods, known as disinformation. It can also be true but taken out of context, like a comment carefully selected from a longer statement so that it does not reflect what the speaker said. It may be a mixture of truth and lies, so that the known facts lend credence to the untruths. In other cases, the information may be true but its significance overblown or the timing of release calculated to cause the most harm possible.

Brodkorb has the establishment on his side and is definitely using the asymmetrical warfare and weaponized information to his advantage.

Stay Tuned for the Board’s decision on Brodkorb’s complaint.



‘They’re using it to symbolize a policy, and that was not the case on this picture’

The image of a crying child at the border is being grossly misrepresented by the mainstream media, the Border Patrol agent who appears in the famous photo says.

On Friday, CBP agent Carlos Ruiz, whose legs appear in the photo as he’s searching the girl’s mother, cleared up the severely distorted events behind the viral image.

“We were patrolling the border, it was after 10 o’clock at night,” agent Ruiz explained in an interview with CBS.

“We asked her to set the kid down in front of her, not away from her… and so we can properly search the mother. So, the kid immediately started crying as she set her down,” Ruiz noted. “I personally went up to the mother and asked her, ‘are you doing OK, is the kid OK?’ and she said, ‘Yes, she’s tired and thirsty and it’s 11 o’clock at night.”

“They’re using it to symbolize a policy and that was not the case on this picture,” he added. “It took less than two minutes, as soon as the search was finished she immediately picked the girl up and the girl immediately stopped crying.”

The crying girl has been the poster child for the media’s contrived outrage over illegal immigrant family separations being blamed on Donald Trump. The child was even featured on a Time Magazine cover with President Trump looking down on her.

Later, after the actual facts behind the photo emerged, Time added a correction to the bottom of their article, noting the girl had never actually been separated from her mom.

On Thursday the child’s father, Denis Javier Varela Hernandez, revealed the truth behind his family’s plight, telling The Daily Mail his wife left their home in Honduras with $6,000 against his wishes. She reached the United States about a month later with the help of human smugglers.

“I know now that they are not in danger. They are safer now than when they were making that journey to the border,” Hernandez told the Daily Mail.

“I don’t have any resentment for my wife, but I do think it was irresponsible of her to take the baby with her in her arms because we don’t know what could happen.”

The Daily Caller reports the mother had been previously deported for attempting to illegally enter the US in 2013.


Let’s focus on the separation of U.S. children from parents through Family Court and Child Predatory Services that occurs daily!

From Left to Right: Michelle MacDonald, MN State Supreme Court Candidate, Jeff Johnson, MN GOP Endorsed Candidate For Governor, Melinda,Sengsavang, Campaign Manager for Michelle MacDonald, Rosemarie Westbury, Designer of #Justice for kids-Stop Legal Kidnapping T-Shirts

We must defund, decentralize, and dismantle the government run child kidnapping ring.


President Trump Rally~Duluth, Minnesota~June 20th, 2018 In Pictures

Melinda Sengsavang, Campaign Manager for Michelle MacDonald, Candidate for MN State Supreme Court

Cardboard Cutout of Mike Lindell CEO of My Pillow, Inc.

92 Year Old Trump Supporter

Fake News Press Box


The energy was unbelievable and the deceptive fakes of this nation have to feel the end of their reign over this country!

Trump covered the improvement of the economy, the fake news media, the recent summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, and his recent executive order that stops the separation of migrant children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border, saying families would be kept together but the border will be “just as tough as it’s been.”

“We have to have control of our borders. And once we lose our borders, we lose our country. We don’t have a country. And once we ease up and say, oh, gee, everybody please come up, we’ll have millions of people flowing through. You have plenty of problems up here in Minnesota with respect to people coming in. And you’ve had a lot of problems and a lot of difficulty. And it’s probably one of the reasons that I almost won Minnesota, which hasn’t been won by a Republican statewide in a long time.

So we have to have strong borders, totally strong. We can’t put with the nonsense. At the same time, we’re doing it with compassion. And I signed an executive order keeping families together, because I think that’s probably a very important thing to be doing. And I also think that it’s the right thing to do. But we haven’t let up. We’re very, very powerful at the border.

We’re going to need the wall. It has to be built. We got to stop the drugs from pouring in. We have to stop people from coming in, if they’re not authorized to come in if they don’t go through the process. You know, we have tremendous numbers of people that have waited for years and years and years to come in. And they’ve gone through a process, and it’s been a hard process and a long process. And then you have people coming over the border, and all of a sudden they’re in our country. It’s a very unfair situation, and we’re going to stop it. We’re going to have laws by the time — as soon as I can do it.

This has been going on for many, many decades. This hasn’t started here. This is a disaster for many decades. So we worked and did a great job on North Korea. We did a great job on the economy. And as I said, if the other group got in, your economy would have gone down the tubes because they would have put more regulations on, more taxes. They wouldn’t have given you a tax decrease; they would have given you a massive tax increase.”

And now, the fake news. . .

The 46 most staggering lines from Donald Trump’s Minnesota speech

Michael Brodkorb Sued for Fake News

Attorney Michelle MacDonald

Michelle MacDonald from MacDonald Law Firm, LLC served Michael Brodkorb individually and doing business as Missing In Minnesota, LLC along with John and Mary Does for Defamation.

Mr. Brodkorb was personally served with the lawsuit on June 14th, 2018 at his home. He yelled at the server to get off his property and screamed that the server was trespassing. Apparently, Brodkorb was unhinged and extremely rageful.

Michael Brodkorb

Once again, Michael Brodkorb thinks the laws don’t apply to him and that he is in his own protected class. He doesn’t seem to understand that a person coming on your property to serve legal papers is not trespassing. Trespassing refers to being in a place one has no legal right to be. Persons may come on to private property to perform legally recognized functions, including post carriers, meter readers, and process servers. Posting a “no trespassing” sign has no legal effect whatsoever.They’re present for a lawful purpose. Jay Bodzin – Avvo

Never mind the fact that Brodkorb was present and taking photographs when I was arrested at my home for blogging in March and that he was the one that incessantly contacted the police to make sure I was arrested for a noncriminal action. First Amendment Arrest


September, 2016, Brodkorb began a social media campaign against Ms. MacDonald. He began posting false and derogatory data, with intent to harm Ms. MacDonald’s personal and professional reputation.

After Brodkorb received cease and desist notices from Ms. MacDonald and her attorneys, Brodkorb ramped up by repeating his false statements, and in January of 2017, he began posting images taken of Ms. MacDonald 3 years earlier, with various posts. The false image of Ms. MacDonald is posted as if it is a mugshot, when in fact it is not.

Brodkorb and the website began using the image with the false claim she is a “person of interest” in a criminal investigation, and has not cooperated with police, and with any random posts, to defame her, when in fact this is not true.

Brodkorb violated numerous provisions of the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalism

Allison Mann, paralegal for Attorney Lisa Elliott (opposing counsel in the false harassment restraining order filed against me in July 2017) joined him on the website publicly in May 2017.

Brodkorb’s website evolved into and is a tool designed solely to defame, libel, slander and humiliate Ms. MacDonald.

Defendants have lied, and continue to make false statements and false implications, on the website and social media, and in front of the public and claim and imply that Ms. MacDonald being investigated for criminal activity as a “person of interest,” and the sole purpose of which is to defame Ms. MacDonald is a criminal and mentally ill.

Brodkorb has blocked Ms. MacDonald and others who supports her or her client, from his social media, and from emails,

In numerous posts, Brodkorb has consistently attempted with malice and by use of the website to turn anyone Ms. MacDonald associates with, including friends, colleagues, clients, supporters and the general public, against Ms. MacDonald and to defame her.

MacDonald is an attorney with solid professional credentials and a dedicated legal and judicial career representing families and individual family members. By this action, Ms. MacDonald and MacDonald Law Firm, LLC seek to recover damages from Brodkorb and the website. The posts on the website and those disseminated on social media contain false and defamatory statements and innuendos concerning Ms. MacDonald’s experience as a duly licensed and practicing attorney, one of the qualifications to run for Judge.

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at


The tort of defamation refers to a false statement, either spoken (“slander”) or written (“libel”) that injures someone’s reputation. However, some types of false statements are considered so damaging that they are deemed defamatory on their face (“defamation per se”).


Implied defamation occurs where one person/publication/etc. expresses a truth that harms another person’s reputation, by implying an untruth. As the Judge states in RICHARD W. YOUNG v. ALISA A. YOUNG, 2015, “Defamation by implication is premised not on direct statements but on false suggestions, impressions and implications arising from otherwise truthful statements…the language of the communication as a whole [must] be reasonably read both to impart a defamatory inference and to affirmatively suggest that the author intended or endorsed that

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Ms. MacDonald and MacDonald Law Firm, LLC request entry of judgment in their favor and against Defendants, in the following manner:

  1. Awarding Ms. MacDonald judgment against the Defendants for damages, including but not limited to compensatory damages, future damages, emotional harm damages, an amount in excess of $50,000.
  2. Awarding MacDonald Law Firm, LLC an amount in excess of $50,000.
  3. Directing Defendants to take down the false image, including a suggested per diem award for the posting of the false image, of $1,000.00 per day, and as the court deems just, retroactive to January 5, 2017, when Defendants first published the false image.
  4. Directing Defendants to take whatever action is necessary to have the current statements and objectionable images removed from the website, social media, and replacing it with a statement that deletes the defamatory language and images.
  5. An Order directing Defendants to cease their wrongful conduct, to publicly admit their wrongful conduct and publicly apologize to Ms. MacDonald.
  6. Directing Defendants to place reasonable and appropriate advertising, in newspapers, radio and including on social media, correcting the defamatory statements that it reported based on Defendant’s statements in the website and social media;
  7. Awarding her costs and disbursements and attorneys’ fees herein; and
  8. Awarding such other and further relief as this Court deems to be just and equitable.

Plaintiffs intend to bring a motion to amend his Complaint, adding a claim for punitive damages pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.191.

JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs request a trial by jury.

Will Michael Brodkorb have to pay for pushing fake news about real people? Only time will tell.

Come On Kessler. . .You Need a Reality Check


        Tea Party Logo                             

(Gateway Pundit) – Barack Obama posted a chilling message to his Twitter account Thursday to the teens marching and organizing for gun control.

He told the youth fighting for gun control ‘we’ve been waiting for you’.

The Gateway Pundit was the first publication to question the media’s agenda in only propping up students who push the anti-gun narrative. We took a lot of heat for it, but we stand by our reporting.

CNN and other fake news media organizations refused to allow pro-gun students to voice their opinions.

It was also revealed CNN scripted their Wednesday night anti-gun town hall.

The left is going for broke. After all, never let a crisis go to waste, right?

Obama tweeted, “Young people have helped lead all our great movements. How inspiring to see it again in so many smart, fearless students standing up for their right to be safe; marching and organizing to remake the world as it should be. We’ve been waiting for you. And we’ve got your backs.”

Remake the world as it should be? Chilling.

Obama also signaled to the youth that the liberal elites with deep pockets ‘have their backs’.

Continue Reading