Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!


Preventing Blogging is Not a Governmental Interest.

For government to regulate speech, it must be “integral to criminal conduct.” United States v. Meredith, 685 F.3d 814, 819, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13012, 7, 2012-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,421, 110 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5157 (9th Cir. Cal. 2012) Typically, restriction of speech concerns a gang member not associating with other gang member; a child pornographer being monitored or restricted from the internet, defendant not speaking to victims, etc.. Speech is presumptively protected by the First Amendment. The burden is on the government to show that a defendant’s website is within one of the narrow categories of unprotected speech.

Suppressing speech rarely is justified by an interest in deterring criminal conduct, and in any event the justification “must be ‘far stronger than mere speculation about serious harms” and supported by “empirical evidence”

Protecting Reputation is Not a Government Interest.

If the Government were to say, ‘the families have been through enough and do not want to cause embarrassment or harm to their reputation’ – such would not be a proper Governmental interest. Specifically, protecting one’s reputation is not a governmental function unless it violates criminal law. 

Further, you have the right to attack people if you believe such behavior was unethical. See Wait v. Beck’s N. Am., Inc., 241 F. Supp. 2d 172, 183 (N.D.N.Y. 2003) (“[A s]tatement[] that someone has acted . . . unethically generally [is] constitutionally protected statements of opinion.”)

This is definitely vexatious litigation. Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender. Wikipedia


Courtroom Vengeance

Judge Openly LAUGHS At Bundy Ranch Defendants Rights ...

The story below has many of the same elements of egregious misconduct that we have faced by various government entities in our parental deprivation charges, investigations, trials and convictions. It also demonstrates the power of “We the People” against the tyranny of government and promotes the fact that “when injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” ~Thomas Jefferson~

UPDATE:  U.S. Marshals in Hot Pursuit of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Most of you are probably aware of the Bundy Ranchers and the standoff against the Feds in 2014. What you probably don’t know is the real story behind it. The mainstream media has consistently pushed the narrative that the Bundy’s and Bundy supporters were anti-government militants, domestic terrorists, lunatic fringe, right-wing extremists.

The truth is that Cliven Bundy and his family have been under attack by the federal government through the land grabbing Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for over two decades. They are saying that Bundy is refusing to pay federal grazing fees. Bundy has reported that the BLM has tried to revoke a deal he and his family have had with the state of Nevada to run him off his land like they have done to the other ranchers from the area. “Years ago, I used to have 52 neighboring ranchers,” he said. “I’m the last man standing. How come? Because BLM regulated these people off the land and out of business.” ranch

Here’s the backstory: Bundy was ordered to stop grazing his 900 head of cattle on sections of land deemed to “protect” the desert tortoise. Oh yeah, that’s believable!  This is the excuse BLM has used to violate claims to easements and regulate southern Nevada ranchers off their land. (84% of Nevada land is already owned by the federal government).

Cliven Bundy however, has consistently stood his ground against the overreaching feds and in 2014, the issue came to a head. The feds entered the area and impounded his cattle. Hundreds of lawfully armed patriots from across the country came to support and defend the Bundy’s and in response, the feds sent snipers, hundreds of heavily-armed agents, helicopters, closed roads and set up a heavily-mocked “First Amendment area.”  They killed a number of the Bundy’s cattle, tasered and threw people to the ground and threatened to shoot while having rifles trained on the supporters day and night.

The BLM Chief Neil Kornze announced an abrupt halt after the weeklong roundup and ultimately, Cliven Bundy got what was left of his cattle back. Bundy said it was “the citizens of America” that brought the standoff to an end.

FOX Legal Analyst Judge Napolitano said the feds were forced to back down because they had suffered a public relations nightmare, pointing out that Bundy lost his case in a federal court but that the case should have been tried in a state court. “The federal judiciary should not be deciding what land the federal government owns,” said Napolitano, adding that the feds should have placed a lien against Bundy’s property to collect grazing fees and not conducted a raid backed up by armed agents to seize his private property.

“The government’s option is to take the amount of money he owes them and docket it, that is, file the lien on his property….the federal government could have done that, instead they wanted this show of force,” said Napolitano, adding, “They swooped in….with assault rifles aimed and ready and stole this guy’s property, they stole his cattle, they didn’t have the right to do that, that’s theft and they should have been arrested by state officials”

Of couse that wasn’t the end of this story and lawful citizens who participated in the Bundy’s Nevada protests including the Bundy’s themselves, were charged with serious crimes including: conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, conspiracy to impede or injure a federal officer, weapon use and possession, assault on a federal officer, threatening a federal law enforcement officer, obstruction of justice, extortion to interfere with commerce and interstate travel in aid of extortion.

U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden said the charges reaffirmed the rule of law. “Persons who use force and violence against federal law enforcement officers who are enforcing court orders and nearly causing catastophic loss of life or injury to others, will be brought to justice.”  Seems like a double standard to me.


Jury Questions Threaten to Derail Prosecution 

July 25, 2017   The defense attorneys have been instructed they are not to bring up BLM activities, or any possibility of misconduct on their part.

The defense cannot discuss the videos of Margaret Houston being thrown to the ground or Ammon Bundy being tasered. The defense cannot discuss the ‘First Amendment Area” the government attempted to force people into. No mention of Dave Bundy’s arrest or subsequent treatment.

There is to be no mention of Clark County Commissioner Tom Collins statements, including folks from Utah are a bunch of “inbred bastards” and if we are coming to Clark County NV to support Cliven Bundy we all “better have funeral plans”. 

There is to be no mention of the BLM destroying Cliven Bundy’s water tanks, and no videos of the massive military-style compound the BLM set up for this operation. There is to be no mention of Federal Cattle Rustling.

The jurors have not heard these instructions. However, they appear to be paying attention and they seem to understand that they are not being given the full story.

Their questions have questioned the truthfulness of some prosecution witnesses, as well as wanting to know who was in charge of this whole operation. And, they have asked about the Constitutionally-guaranteed rights of the second amendment.  Read More

In essence, Navarro has barred the defense from citing the violations of the law by the government’s minions, plain and simple.

August 22, 2017 San Francisco Airport Provides Excellent Amenities ... For the second time this year, the federal government tried and failed to convict four men who joined the high-profile Bundy family in its 2014 standoff with federal agents in a dispute over grazing fees for cattle.  Las Vegas jury acquitted two of the four men on trial, Ricky Lovelien and Steven Stewart, on all 10 charges against them.

The jury found the other two defendants, Scott Drexler and Eric Parker, not guilty on most charges, but it could not reach verdicts on four charges against Parker and two charges against Drexler. ~Los Angeles Times~

Freedom Outpost

Unbelievable! Government to Retry Bundy Ranch Defendants a Third Time!

These tyrants just can’t let it go.  They can’t make their case to the jury to find these men guilty so they are going to try them a third time and push other defendants’ court date back further into the future!

Instead of doing the right thing, Federal judges, prosecutors, investigators, and more have all done the wrong thing.  At each opportunity where the situation could have been de-escalated, it was instead escalated.


All of these defendants including Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his sons Ammon and Ryan Bundy have spent 18 months in prison while federal prosecutors try their case over and over and over again.

Judge Navarro

Judge Gloria Navarro had refused to release the Bundy’s and their supporters including journalist Pete Santilli under pre-trial release even though none have prior criminal records.

November 30, 2017 Navarro recently reversed the ruling that kept the defendants in custody.  She released Cliven Bundy, Ammon Bundy, and Ryan Payne to a house arrest status with a monitoring devise.  Cliven Bundy, who was incarcerated and considered a danger to society and a flight risk for the last 22 months, refused his release until his supporters waiting for trial are released. He also insists that he will walk out as a free man, not to a halfway house.

Since the beginning of the trial, the court has had a week off scheduled from December 3rd through the 10th. The next court date is Dec.11th.


December 5, 2017 Bundy’s and Supporters Released               

Image may contain: 3 people, people smiling, people standing

Mel Bundy Facebook

Image may contain: one or more people and hat

Joe O’Shaughnessy Facebook

The third week of the USA v Bundy trial in Las Vegas is showing a pattern. A prosecution witness inadvertently exposes new evidence that the prosecution has failed to provide to the defense.  The defense attorneys follow with a flurry of motions to compel the prosecution to produce the evidence and more motions for a mistrial and dismissal of the case due to prosecutorial misconduct.  The hearings are then held without the jury in the courtroom and Judge Navarro rules on the motions.

Continue Reading

Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, people standing, hat and outdoor

Dave Bundy Facebook

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, hat and outdoor

Jason Wood Facebook

Image may contain: 1 person, sitting, hat and outdoor

Cliven Bundy Facebook












Michael Mclaughlin November 29 at 8:03pm


“After spending nearly two years in prison for a crime he didn’t commit, he was granted a pre-trial release. Rather than be released he has refused his freedom until all of the men still incarcerated who rallied to support the Bundy family in April of 2014 are released..

I don’t think there are many Americans with more integrity and courage than Cliven Bundy. He is a man who loves America and the principles upon which our nation was founded. Even though defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, Cliven has not been found guilty of any crime and yet he has been unlawfully incarcerated of 647 days. What ever happened to speedy trial guaranteed in the Constitution. He has been denied bail and treated as though he has been convicted of a crime.

After spending 647 days in prison for a crime he didn’t commit, he was granted a pre-trial release. Rather than accepting this offer he refused to accept his freedom until all of the men still incarcerated who rallied to support the Bundy family in April of 2014″..



Senator Harry Reid and Judge Navarro Are Guilty of Treason Against the People of the United States

I have authored two previous parts of this series in which I disclosded how I knew that the Bundy release was going to be ordered almost three days prior to the ruling by Judge Navarro and that Navarro was being legally blackmailed by elements loyal to the country and the Constitution in order to force the release of the Bundys’.

In this third part, I will dislose that Navarro and Senator Harry Reid et al, are guilty of treason and at the heart of the matter involves the facilitation of the United States being conquered by a Red Dawn type of invasion. Judge Navarro was up to her eyes in this conspiracy and is guilty of conspiracy to commit treason.

Judge Navarro and Senator Harry Reid

The FBI agent who provided me with the information that the Bundys’ were going to be ordered to be released from prison told me that the FBI/DOJ put the squeeze on Navarro in order to force the Bundy’s release from prison. I was told that Navarro was guilty of taking orders from Obama, even after he left office in January of 2017 and that she was protecting Senator Harry Reid. We find the motivation behind this allegation from the following paragraphs.

The association between Navarro, Reid and Obama has a clear path as evidenced by the following excerpt:

From US

On January 1, 2014, Judge Navarro became Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Chief Judge Navarro was nominated by President Barack Obama on December 24, 2009 (Christmas Eve) to United States District Judge for the District of Nevada. She was confirmed by a unanimous vote of the U.S. Senate on May 5, 2010 (Cinco de Mayo) and took the oath as a United States District Judge on May 25, 2010. She was recommended for the bench by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid while she was serving as a Chief Deputy District Attorney for Clark County in the Civil Division…

The ties between Navarro and Reid run very deep.

The Move to Impeach Navarro

The associations between Reid and Navarro ran even deeper. Please note the following from We Are Change (Please note the key elements related to Harry Reid and Judge Navarro as they are represented by bold ink):

Continue Reading:


The Bundy Ranch standoff video that the media doesn’t want you to see


The truth about the Bundy standoff revealed

As people who participated in the Bundy’s Nevada protests are charged with serious crimes, David Knight turns the eyes of justice back to the government agents who incriminated lawful citizens.

Image may contain: 1 personCLIVEN BUNDY AMERICAN PATRIOT

This shocking, yet true, story as told to the author, with twists and turns, highs and lows of intrigue and common sense of the life of one man, his devoted family, and fellow patriots that are only matched by our Founding Fathers.





Media Dishonesty

Once again, the media is engaging in dishonest reporting and twisting the facts to cover up for the crimes of Dakota County.

“Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, according to Missing in Minnesota’s Twitter account, this is Michael Brodkorb’s outlet, she’s apparently 10 days late for her jail term. This is the woman who stole her kids and shipped them off down to western MN. She’s 10 days late for her jail term and even more surprising, no warrant has been issued for her arrest. Hmm, I wonder if that would be the same for a minority suspect. Probably not.”  Matt McNeil (Yes, she’s the epitome of white privilege isn’t she? Stripped of children, property and finances. If that’s privilege, I’d hate to see what disadvantaged looks like.)

Here’s the real scoop: Sandra’s appeal was affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded back to the district court for a resentencing hearing. There is no warrant because there is no reason to issue a warrant. 

These libel and slander tactics are a blatant attempt to confuse the public on the facts of these cases. They are also an attempt to induce hostility by using statements about race and “stealing children” to try to influence the attitudes of the public against us. The true facts of the case are simple. . .The kids ran away because of abuse, they asked for help, but were denied at every turn. The system failed to protect these children!

The outrageous actions by these people should make you wonder what they don’t want you to know.

The Rule of Law is Dead

Ultra Liberal Colorado Demonstrates How the Rule of Law Is Dead In America

A shoplifter runs from Walmart after shoplifting a couple of belts. He is chased by police into a strangers home in Greenwood Village, (where else but liberal) Colorado. Police destroy the home and offer only 5,000 dollars. Two years later the City of Greenwood Village keeps delaying the homeowners lawsuit in he alleges unfair compensation. Americans now live in a state of martial law where Constitutional protections such as 5th Amendment property rights are no longer respected. This case in liberal Colorado demonstrates how the rule of law in America is dead…..

Please donate to offset the costs of The Common Sense Show



What’s really behind the storm of sexual harassment allegations inundating the entertainment, news and political worlds?

When mainstream media hypes up a topic, they’re diverting the public’s attention from other subjects by convincing society that this is the most pressing issue we are facing. They’re also conditioning society to accept institutional policies, regulations and control as a solution to the problem. Mainstream media is roughly 25 percent truths and 75 percent distorted information/lies and media has always been one of the most effective tools to control how the public thinks.

This has Soros written all over it! Organizations Funded Directly by George Soros and his Open Society Foundations

The #MeToo Social Media Craze Is Falling Apart as Truth About “Harassment” Comes Out

In the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, the #MeToo hashtag exploded across social media. Women who had experienced sexual harassment and abuse came forward to make sure that everyone knew they had experienced suffering at the hands of men.

However, one writer for The Federalist thinks that the hashtag has gone too far.

In a sure-to-be-controversial piece titled “Ladies, You Haven’t Been Raped If Someone Catcalled At You,” Inez Feltscher said that the #MeToo social media movement hasn’t made a bit of difference for perverts like Weinstein while putting men without perverted designs on edge.

“It’s not a real solution to suggest, as the Left does, that society should just ‘teach men not to rape,’” Feltscher wrote.

“The Weinsteins of the world won’t care, and the men who do need a better script for how to express interest in women should not be punished for ever-more-minor infractions in a culture that thinks that all displays of masculinity, whether gentlemanly or inappropriate, are equally sexist.

“Meanwhile, the sleazeballs don’t give a rip about #MeToo, but good men are forced into questioning their own innocent interactions,” she said. – Continue Reading


Graafix!: Wallpapers Flag of FranceFrance’s “Me too” campaign may come with legislation

Marlène Schiappa, France’s gender equality minister (yes, that’s a thing), has proposed putting forward a bill in parliament that would fine people for engaging in street harassment — including aggressive catcalls.

“The point is that the whole of society has to redefine what it will accept and what it will not,” Schiappa told La Croix, a French Catholic newspaper. On French radio she explained that policing behavior on the street is “completely necessary because at the moment street harassment is not defined in the law. … We can’t currently make a complaint.”

Pressed on what behaviors would be considered harassment, she replied, “We know very well at what point we start feeling intimidated, unsafe, or harassed in the street.”

Read in its entirety


Children Now Warned Against Hugging Their Family During the Holiday Season

“Seriously? So now teaching our kids to show affection to FAMILY is basically child abuse?” one commenter wrote. “Unless something inappropriate is going on, this shouldn’t even be a topic to discuss… and if that is the case, that is an entirely different discussion.”


Notice the formulaic talking points being rolled out at every level of government.

Paul Ryan

Paul Ryan orders mandatory sexual harassment training for members, staff

Ryan called the hearing an “important step” in efforts to combat sexual harassment and added, “As we work with the Administration, Ethics, and Rules committees to implement mandatory training, we will continue our review to make sure the right policies and resources are in place to prevent and report harassment.”



Dayton: Schoen, Cornish Resignations ‘Important First Steps’

“These are very important first steps,” Dayton said of their resignations. Since those allegations first came to light, Dayton launched a review to overhaul the executive branch’s training and reporting procedures for sexual harassment.

It’s interesting to note that Rep. Tony Cornish was the chair of the House Public Safety Committee for the past three years and Dan Schoen was a democratic member of the Judiciary and Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee.

The Minnesota House Public Safety and Security Policy and Finance Committee oversees and funds all areas within public safety, including the court system, the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, and other corrections and justice programs.

The Judiciary and Public Safety Committee is a standing committee of the Minnesota State Senate. The Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over all bills relating to the judiciary, human rights, family law, property law, remedies, crime prevention, law enforcement, criminal justice, and corrections

On November 21, 2017, Cornish announced that he would resign from office on December 1 due to sexual misconduct allegations levied against him by state Rep. Erin Maye Quade (D) and lobbyist Sarah Walker. In a statement announcing his resignation, he apologized for his behavior. To read more about the Cornish allegations and other instances of sexual misconduct at state capitols in 2017, click here.

At the time his resignation was announced, Schoen denied the allegations against him. Schoen’s resignation is effective December 15. To read more about the Schoen allegations and other instances of sexual misconduct at state capitols in 2017, click here.


“[T]his resolution will simply require that all Senators and staff receive sexual harassment training, as well as on other forms of harassment, at least once every 2 years.”
Every U.S. Senator Will Be Required to Undergo Sexual Harassment Training

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D.-Minn.)

( – Every member of the U.S. Senate and all staff members are required to undergo sexual harassment training in the next 60 days and at least once every two years after that under the terms of a resolution that the Senate approved on Thursday evening.

The resolution was sponsored by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D.-Minn.), the ranking member of the Senate Rules Committee, and co-sponsored by 19 others. Among the co-sponsors were Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R.-Ky.), Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R.-Iowa), Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D.-Ill.) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R.-Texas).

“[T]his resolution will simply require that all Senators and staff receive sexual harassment training, as well as on other forms of harassment, at least once every 2 years—in addition to that, 60 days after it passes,” Klobuchar said on the Senate floor shortly before the resolution was approved.

“What happens if Senators do not receive this training?’ said Klobuchar.

“The American people will know.”

Continue Reading:

Good old Amy never misses an oppotunity to seize on current events to publicize her virtuous feelings!


No Evidence That Training Prevents Harassment, Finds EEOC Task Force (Click to read)

The mainstream media is saying taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay for congressional sexual harassment settlements. Taxpayers should however, have to pay for training with no evidence that this training has had any effect on preventing workplace harassment.


Official Portrait of President Donald Trump.jpgMainstream media is also injecting President Trump into these sexual harassment stories every chance they get. Since the Russian collusion coup d’etat isn’t working, it’s time to try sexual harassment claims in an attempt to force Trump from office.

“Some of the women who accused Donald Trump of sexual harassment or assault during the presidential campaign wonder when the president might finally pay a price for what he allegedly did to them.

I feel this issue has been ‘on hold’ all year, but not forgotten,” says Stoynoff in an email. “It’s been simmering on the stove with the lid on, like a pressure cooker. But now the heat’s on and it’s going to boil and the lid is going to blast off.”

That blast off may come with help from a defamation lawsuit filed by Summer Zervos, a former Apprentice contestant who has alleged Trump began kissing her very aggressively and put his hand on her breast without her consent in 2007.

Zervos filed the suit after Trump repeatedly called his accusers liars. Through her attorney, Gloria Allred, she declined to be interviewed for this story.

Norm Eisen, former chief White House ethics lawyer for President Barack Obama, says the lawsuit is “critically important” because “the president’s alleged offenses against women, of sexual harassment, sexual assault, are very serious, much more serious than many of those that have resulted in people losing their jobs.

Trump, meanwhile, has called the ongoing legal case against him  “totally fake news. It’s just fake. It’s fake. It’s made-up stuff, and it’s disgraceful.”

In a statement to PEOPLE, his attorney Marc Kasowitz says the lawsuit is “based on allegations of events that never occurred.”

Read article in its entirety:

The hashtag #MeToo has gone viral sparking a revolution. Those that post it are announcing that they too are a victim of sexual assault. The general thrust behind the movement is to illustrate the pervasiveness of predatory perversion upon the female population. Males have also taken to using the tag to highlight their victim-hood. Prior to this trend sexual assault victims had a hard enough time. To seek justice victims had to publicly come forward and face their accusers in court as they recounted their traumatic experiences. The veracity of claims have been further scrutinized because of the significant number of false accusations and the magnitude of injustice that results when these false accusation lead to a conviction. It is my opinion that #MeToo will further discredit real victims. This effect will be hyper amplified by the velocity and volume of social media. Any Twitter/Instagram user with any agenda at no cost and no risk can now claim victim-hood. Sympathy, genuine or not, will be achieved through social media solidarity. The authentic victims of sexual violence will be marginalized drowned out by a sea of social sympathy. Unfortunately for them and the rest of society there is a more sinister second phase to this social engineering operation.

Sexual Assault is a serious societal issue with insidious long terms effects. Efforts should be made to reduce this scourge in society. The social media witch hunt is being presented as a way to take down powerful villains. Harvey Weinstein is currently being eviscerated by social media. Whether these sensationalized scandals are actually happening or they are completely scripted doesn’t really matter. The world believes that the King of Hollywood is being tarred and feathered by the unwashed masses. The elites can use their war chests to mount a defense should one ever really be required. But it won’t.

The true target of all this public finger pointing is the general public itself. Anyone’s reputation can now be destroyed by synchronizing bawdy tales of sexual assault. These stories can be created via computer algorithms and cast widely across numerous platforms. Likes can be manipulated and retweets can be accelerated bolstering public condemnation. ‘Victims’ backstories can be corroborated and their timelines coordinated through the backdating of a newly created social media presence.. Unlike the wealthy entertainers currently being confronted most folks can not afford to fight such allegations. Employers will fire the accused. Spouses will divorce them . Friends will turn away. This is the new world we are creating . Enemies of the powerful, challengers of the system and investigators of the truth will be destroyed with a key stroke. The justly motivation of saving women and empowering the voiceless is being used against those it seeks to protect. Proponents of #MeToo say a revolution is underway. They are mistakenly doing the bidding for those they oppose creating a much more dangerous reality for all woman (& all men). A world where everyone can be silenced. The desired empowerment will not occur. The opposite will happen. There is a term for that. It is enslavement.

The War on Words

College Calls Police on Student for Saying “Tranny” on the Radio

Posted by     Monday, November 20, 2017 at 1:30pm

“the station manager came approximately 15 minutes later with a police officer”

Think of all the outrageous things students and professors have said about Trump in the last six months. Yet the police get called over this?

The Daily Caller reports:

College Calls Police On Student Who Said ‘Tranny’ On Radio

A university called the police on a student who used the word “tranny” on radio, kicking him and his co-host out of the studio, according to a Friday video.

The unnamed manager of the student radio station at University of Minnesota-Morris told the student co-hosts to leave the station, asserting that they had violated Federal Communications Commission (FCC) policy, but the university has since changed its stated reasoning behind the students’ suspension, reported The College Fix.

“You know, you can definitely, you see one tranny that’s trying to punch someone,” Brandon Albrecht, a UMM student, said on-air. “You know it’s automatically that one guy that you know I’m talking about. I bet you know. I’m not going to dox anybody and name them on air. But you two know if I say the tranny who looks like he’s going to punch someone. Yep.”

Albrecht used the term while discussing the lack of Antifa violence at his school with co-host Taylor Lehmann on their radio program “Deplorable Radio.”

Albrecht asserted that the station manager came approximately 15 minutes later with a police officer to kick them off air, while speaking with The College Fix.

Here’s the related video:


%d bloggers like this: