Lion News: Exclusive Video Of Samantha Rucki Testifying Her Testimony Is Not Of Her Free Will?

ArrestAJudgeKit

SubscribedUnsubscribe1,5801K

Lawless Lakeville

Scandal in ‘Lawless Lakeville’: Matt Little Illegally Elected Mayor?September 12, 2016

Matt Little, Lakeville??

Lakeville, Dakota County, MN: Mayor Matt Little is accused of committing fraud by lying about his address in order to meet residency requirements needed to run for office as council man, and later, mayor in Lakeville. The allegation, raised by Terry Dean, Nemmers includes, “City Of Lakeville Mayor Matt Little Doesn’t Even Reside In Lawless Lakeville?  2010 & 2012 & 2014 Affidavit Of Candidacy Proves Little Resides In Rosemount? 2016 Affidavit Of Candidacy & 2014 Lawyer License Info Prove Little Resides in Farmington? How Many Days Has Little Lived In The Lawless Shit-Hole Called The City Of Lakeville, Huh? Not A Single Day?” Scandal Alert! City Of Lakeville Mayor Matt Little Doesn’t Even Reside In Lawless Lakeville?

According to the Minnesota Constitution, a candidate must live in the city for at least 30 days before a city election in order to serve as a mayor. If a mayor fails to maintain a city residency, state statute provides that a vacancy in office is created. Handbook for Minnesota Cities: Elected Officials & Council, Structure and Role

Little was a former Lakeville city council member (2010). He was ran for mayor in 2012, and won as the youngest elected mayor, and was elected again in 2014. Records show during the time that Little served as mayor, he did not live in Lakeville, and did not meet residency requirements. As a law student, Little should have been aware of those requirements.This means that Little fraudulently ran for mayor, and illegally held office.

spam clip art

Records Include:

  • 2010 Affidavit of Candidacy showing Matt Little’s address as 16162 Fairgreen Avenue in Rosemount. In 2010, Little served on the Lakeville city council. Property tax records indicate this home belongs to Little’s parents.
  • 2014 Affidavit of Candidacy shows Matt Little’s address as 16162 Fairgreen Avenue, Rosemount
  • 2014 Minnesota Supreme Court Lawyer’s Office Registration Listing for Little’s law license lists his address as 17523 Freeport Ct in Farmington. Dakota County Property Tax records verify this home as belonging to Little.
  • 2016 Filing for Senate showing Matt Little’s address as 17523 Freeport Ct in Farmington.
  • The Minnesota Secretary of State business record details for “Little for Lakeville” (file #3230155-2) list Matt Little’s address as 16153 Finland Avenue in Rosemount. Little is using his brother’s Lakeville address to qualify for eligibility. However, Dakota County Property Tax Records indicate this home actually belongs to Little’s parents. “Little for Lakeville” is a Minnesota Assumed Name, which was filed on February 25, 2009. The filing status is listed as Active / In Good Standing until 2019.

Minnesota Secretary of State Listing: Little for Lakeville

Minnesota Secretary of State Listing: Little for Lakeville

Dakota County Property Information Search - Matt Little, owns a home, and makes his primary residence, in Farmington

Dakota County Property Information Search – Matt Little, owns a home, and makes his primary residence, in Farmington

Little is also exploiting the tragedy of the Grazzini-Rucki case to make a name for himself politically.

Little took time from his busy schedule to publicly thank the Lakeville police department, Jim Backstrom and Prosecuting Attorney Kathryn M. Keena “for bringing peace and justice to our community” after securing a guilty verdict against Sandra Grazzini-Rucki. Little has given special attention to the Grazzini-Rucki case while ignoring more serious crimes occurring in Lakeville. For example a Lakeville fire lieutenant recently resigned from the department after being charged with giving alcohol to a minor, and then raping him. In another recent case, a body was found dead at the side of the road. According to Little “peace and justice” was restored to Lakeville after Sandra was convicted, even as more serious crimes that pose a real threat to public safety are happening. Then again if Little does not live in Lakeville, does he really know what is happening there???

peacejustice

Also disturbing is that Little’s public applause implies that he supports David Rucki, and supports the unjust family court decisions that have caused so much pain and upheaval in the lives of Sandra and the children.

In truth, it is David Rucki who poses a danger to the community. Rucki has a long history of violent behavior, history of criminal convictions and has been connected to various financial scams. David Rucki’s Greatest Hits (Police Reports), The Provocateur Yet Matt Little remains silent, and never made a public announcement when Rucki was convicted of assault, domestic violence with OFP violations, or anything else he has done.

How can the community be safer when its own system to secure “peace and justify” is not only failing but also promoting corruption, at epic levels?

Stay tuned for updates!

https://justice4grazziniruckifamily.wordpress.com/2016/09/12/mayor-matt-little-scandal/

LION NEWS: EXCLUSIVE VIDEO OF SAMANTHA RUCKI CALLING DAKOTA CO. JUDGE KNUTSON A “DICK”

Lion News: Exclusive Video Of Samantha Rucki Calling Dakota County Judge Knutson A “Dick”?

Part 2 – Inside Story Of The Rigged High-Profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Criminal Case

lion news

LION NEWS IS A LOCAL GRASSROOTS MEDIA OUTLET. LION NEWS FOCUSES IN ON LOCAL CORRUPTION.   

Grigsby

Stephen Grigsby & Michelle MacDonald

Are you ready for installment #2 of the Inside Story Of The Rigged High-Profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Criminal Case No.19HA-CR-15-2669? Hmm?
MacDonald’s co-author and hack Michael Volpe had a hissy fit over the first installment, didn’t he?  Oh, you didn’t know that MacDonald and Volpe were writing a book about the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case? It has the following idiotic title: “Frogs in water: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the world’s last child custody trial,” hasn’t it? It’s one of those teaching books written by an incompetent, isn’t it?

 

Complaint Summons

It is the responsibility of your criminal defense attorney to gather any and all favorable evidence that tends to prove your innocence.  Thus, you need to make sure your criminal defense attorney holds prosecutors to their obligation to turn over ALL favorable evidence.  Effective criminal defense attorneys are proactive: a defense attorney must not hesitate to seek sanctions against a prosecutor whom fails to uphold their Brady obligation. Brady Obligations: Make Sure Your Lawyer Gets ALL of the Evidence! January 27, 2012 By Katie Riggs, arrestedmn.com – Ryan Pacyga, Criminal Defense Attorney – Minnesota Lawyer License No: 0321576 (Emphasis added)

Image Courtesy of Stuart Miles @ FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image Courtesy of Stuart Miles @ FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Being smart enough to read and comprehend a law book, I knew that Gisgsby was lying through his teeth, didn’t I?  In fact, I even told Grigsby that I knew an attorney who was sanctioned in a criminal case, didn’t I?

BLUE EARTH — The Faribault County Attorney’s Office is seeking sanctions against the defense lawyer for the deported Blue Earth-area priest convicted of inappropriately touching an underage girl. Faribault County Attorney Troy Timmerman filed the request this month claiming defense attorney Philip Elbert, who represented former Diocese of Winona priest Leo Koppala, leaked a significant amount of non-public documents to an online blogger without redacting sensitive information. The documents appear on the blogger’s website and a related Youtube video, which featured a recorded conversation between Elbert and the blogger about providing the documents. County attorney seeks sanctions in priest case By Josh Moniz, the rag called the Mankato Free Press.com Jun 18, 2014 (Emphasis added) http://www.mankatofreepress.com/news/local_news/county-attorney-seeks-sanctions-in-priest-case/article_52865758-a915-59b3-b5ea-a6e809b609dd.html

Hostile Grigsby tried bullying me into thinking that I didn’t know what I was talking about, didn’t he?  I even told Grisgby that there was a newspaper article about the attorney getting sanctioned, didn’t I?  (I forgot to mention that I was mentioned in the article, didn’t I?)

Attorney Philip Elbert reminded the judge of a rule from the Minnesota rules of criminal procedures. Elbert explained that any others who participated in the investigation, and who regularly report to the prosecutor, must disclose any information. “All officers, part-time or not, report to the prosecutor,” Elbert says. Ruling favors priest Defense entitled to full disclosures October 27, 2013 by Brock Buesing – Register Staff Writer (bbuesing@faribaultcountyregister.com) , Faribault County Register

Grigsby turned his bullying up another notch by insisting that I wasn’t even smart enough to comprehend a simple newspaper article, didn’t he? \But no matter how hard he tried Grigsby couldn’t bully me off the truth, could he? He couldn’t, could he?

Lion News: Father Koppala Framed? Interview With Koppala Defense Attorney Philip Elbert?
http://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2014/05/lion-news-father-koppala-framed.html

The reality is that Grigsby should have and actually still can still file sanctions in rigged high-profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki criminal case no.19HA-CR-15-2669.

ID-100411976

Image courtesy of sirirakphotos at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Gaslighting is a type of projective identification in which an individual (or group of individuals) attempt to influence the mental functioning of a second individual by causing the latter to doubt the validity of his or her judgments, perceptions, and/or reality testing in order that the victim will more readily submit his will and person to the victimizer. (See Chapter 2 for a more comprehensive discussion of gaslighting.) Gaslighting, The Double Whammy, Interrogation and Other Covert Control in Psychotherapy & Analysis, Theo L. Dorpat (Maryland: 2004), Page 6.

The reality also is that Grigsby is just as much of trained and professional liar as corrupt Dakota Co. Attorney James “Sovereign Citizen” Backstrom, right? Finally, it is a reality that neither Grigsby nor MacDonald want to admit that their bungling and aiding & abetting Backstrom got Sandra convicted, isn’t it?

 

… that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!  Isaiah 5:20King James Version (KJV)

It’s trivia question time, isn’t it?Question Mark
Trivia Question #2: Which of Sandra’s attorneys couldn’t even get their discovery/evidence (Dash cam video) in their own criminal case? Hint: Did you know that the attorney’s former campaign manager was able to get the attorney’s citation in searchable pdf format? Yet, the attorney was not able to, were they?

Was it?:
A. Short-time criminal defense attorney Michelle MacDonald
B. So-called defender of the constitution Michelle MacDonald
C. Supreme court candidate Michelle MacDonald

Trivia Question #2 Answer:  A, B, C

It’s history time, isn’t it?

https://twitter.com/missinginmn/status/758673275073417217
Missing in Minnesota @missinginmn UPDATE: Grazzini-Rucki arrived at the court – impeccably dressed. Stephen Grigsby was seen yelling at her in the parking lot. #grazzinirucki Retweet 1 Likes 5 S Zizzou Sam Sansevere Tony Jones Pam Nelson Jenny Love Nathan M. Hansen 7:39 AM – 28 Jul 2016

Caroline Rice describes Grigsby as a bully, doesn’t she? She does, doesn’t she?

Case No. 10-CR-10-1003 State of Minnesota vs Caroline Marie Rice
Amended Disposition (Judicial Officer: Perkins, Richard C.) Reason: Prosecution motion granted, Appeals Court Reversal
1. Deprive Custody/Parent Rights-Cause Child Being Runaway (Not applicable – GOC) Dismissed
2. Deprive Another-Cust/Parental Rights-Conceal Minor Dismissed
3. Deprive-Custody/Parent Rights-Violation Court Order-Take Minor Dismissed

It’s safe to say that Sandra was bullied and intimidated into accepting the false idea that nothing could be done about the obstruction of justice in her rigged case, isn’t it?  It is also safe to say that Sandra was bullied and intimidated into accepting the false idea that she couldn’t have her own files/property to prepare for the rigged trial, isn’t it?

More damning revelations in installment #3, right?

More to come . . .

Dirty Rotten Prosecutor Tricks

AUGUST 1, 2016

Michael Volpe Reports: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Convicted After 75% of Defense Evidence Withheld

TearsDakotaCounty

Journalist Michael Volpe, Communities Digital News (CDN), recently wrote an article describing a short history of the Grazzini-Rucki case, offering new details about abuse allegations and other evidence that was withheld from the jury in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s criminal trial.

Sandra raised the affirmative defense at trial, meaning she assisted her teenage daughters in running away because she feared for their safety. Volpe writes, “Approximately 75 percent of the evidence her defense planned to use was disallowed by Dakota County Judge Karen Asphaug.The jury was only presented with one side of the story, that of Assistant Dakota County Attorney, Kathryn Keena, and was not allowed to review  evidence and supporting documentation or hear from crucial witnesses that would provide additional information on the events leading up to when the Rucki sisters ran away. This means the jury was not allowed to gain an understanding of the context in which Sandra made her decision.

Sandra will likely appeals with decision.

Read the full article here: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki convicted of hiding daughters

Please like, share, repost and comment on our article and Volpe’s,

your support and feedback is important!

Judge Karen J Asphaug

Judge Karen J Asphaug

Kathryn Keena

Kathryn Keena

Grazzini-Rucki Child Support Hearing

Justice for Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and Children August 26, 2016

Grazzini-Rucki Child Support Hearing Raises Concerns of Fraud, Abuse of Discretion

lionmoney

An August 11th 2016 child support hearing in Dakota County regarding David Rucki and Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, played out with the antics of a circus side show, freakishly contorting law and issuing orders that defy justice.

The hearing was presided by Magistrate Maria K. Pastoor (a magistrate is appointed in cases where the obligee is receiving public assistance). Magistrate Pastoor issued a temporary order for child support and continued the case to hold an evidentiary hearing, just 5 days before Sandra’s sentencing on criminal charges, to determine child support. How can you issue a child support order days before a person may be sentenced to prison? According to Minnesota law, if the court determines that a person has no income and completely lacks the ability to earn income, then the minimum support does not apply and child support may not be ordered. Also, minimum support orders do not apply to an obligor who is incarcerated, unless they have income and assets to pay support. Sandra has neither income or assets. It is unprecedented that Magistrate Pastoor would issue a child support order under these circumstances. The amount of money and resources Dakota County has expended on pursuing Sandra for child support, has far exceeded any benefit it can hope to gain.

Another bizarre aspect of this child support case is the restrictions Magistrate Pastoor put on attorney, Michelle MacDonald, severely limiting her ability to access and review financial information about David Rucki. Ms. MacDonald has filed several discovery requests, and contempt motions against Rucki. Rucki continues to obstruct child support proceedings by refusing to comply with court orders and provide financial information. Another ploy Rucki uses is filing frivolous motions against Sandra, and waging false accusations without evidence to back up his outlandish claims. Dakota County refuses to hold him accountable, contempt orders are always dismissed.

Millionaire David Rucki now claims to be living in the lowest levels of poverty, and is receiving public assistance without ever proving a need for it.

One Sided Evidentiary Hearing

In order to establish child support the Court has to determine the income of BOTH parents. Under Minnesota law, both parents must file a financial affidavit, and disclose all sources of gross income for purposes of child support. Sandra has complied. David Rucki is refusing to cooperate and is actively hiding income and assets. Rucki is also refusing to comply with discovery requests. Dakota County is well aware that he has refused to provide information, but has done nothing to hold him accountable.

Now, Magistrate Pastoor has issued an order severely limiting the ability of Sandra’s attorney, Michelle MacDonald, to review and access financial information about Rucki.  Pastoor’s bizarre order states that Ms. MacDonald may view Rucki’s recent filing and tax return only under the watch of a sheriff’s deputy at the Dakota County Service Center. Ms. MacDonald can not have any electronics in her possession when viewing the information (is she going to be searched? patted down?). Ms. MacDonald is not allowed to have copies of the actual documents but can take handwritten notes (how does that comply with evidentiary standards?). She may only view the information at a time “acceptable to court administration”. There are ways to protect the confidentiality of parties but what Magistrate Pastoor is imposing is oppressive, and goes above and beyond standard court confidentiality policies.

A fair and impartial evidentiary hearing can not be one sided – each party should be treated the same by the Court, and each held to the same set of rules and practices. Let’s be clear – this is a child support case, NOT a national security issue. The order does not indicate any justification for such drastic measures. This is clearly an abuse of discretion.

Rucki: From Riches to Rags

Pic posted by David Rucki, Facebook April 2016, with a statement about missing daughters.

Without providing any proof of income or assets. millionaire David Rucki now claims he is desperately poor, that the children are starving and struggling, and he requires public assistance in order to survive. According to court records, “The Father (Rucki) receives child support services from Dakota County for the joint children pursuant to Title IV-D of the Social Security Act.” Rucki has also received assistance from the Wetterling Foundation in obtaining “reunification” therapy in California for his runaway teenage daughters, with a Disney vacation thrown in.

However, the court record also contains evidence that Rucki had substantial income, had ownership in several Minnesota businesses, owns or has possession of, multiple vehicles and has at least 3 real estate properties (two that have recently been remodeled). Even if Rucki refuses to comply with discovery, and even if Rucki refuses to provide the Court with documentation, his income could be imputed for child support purposes. When a Court, and for that matter Dakota County should also be considering this information for eligibility purposes, estimates a party’s income, it can consider a broad range of information – including lifestyle, ability to maintain current expenses, cash flow and other concrete resources (including vehicles). Also, a support order does not have to be based on income alone but can also consider resources, property and business interests.

According to public records, “impoverished” Rucki owns two separate homes in Minnesota, and an additional Disney vacation property in Florida. Rucki owns multiple vehicles, including classic cars. Rucki owns assets, trucks, and equipment related to his trucking business. In addition, Rucki is able to afford expensive legal counsel, and has retained at least two separate law firms to represent his interests.

dave-ruckicaddy

David Rucki driving his classic Cadillac – used to stalk and harass Sandra Grazzini-Rucki

Consider This:

A prior real estate listing boasts about Rucki’s home in Farmington – recently updated, cherry cabinets, tiled floors, 5 bedrooms and 3 baths, and a two car garage. The property also includes an impressive 65 x 45 heated “shed” that towers over the home. The “shed” includes heat, hot and cold water plumbing, and has an expensive trailer parked out in front. According to public tax statement records, the value of the property is listed at $222,000 with property taxes of $3,315 a year.

http://www.movoto.com/lakeville-mn/17549-flagstaff-ave-lakeville-mn-55024-651_4573184/

Rucki's property in Farmington

Rucki’s property in Farmington (movoto.com)

Rucki also owns a home in an upscale neighborhood in Lakeville – this home includes 5 bedrooms, 4 baths, recent updates, hickory floors and stainless appliances. Total lot size is 22,477 square feet. A recent photo of the home, taken by a satellite map, shows 3 vehicles parked in garage. According to property tax records, the current value of the home is $479,000 with $6,492 in propety taxes.

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/19675-Ireland-Pl-Lakeville-MN-55044/1666608_zpid/

Rucki's Lakeville property (Zillow.com)

Rucki’s Lakeville property (Zillow.com)

A previous article on Red Herring Alert offers information and documentation alleging that Rucki was involved in mortgage fraud and title washing in a scheme involving the Lakeville home: MORTGAGE FRAUD? Ireland Place (Red Herring Alert)

Continue Reading:https://justice4grazziniruckifamily.wordpress.com/2016/08/26/grazzini-rucki-child-suport-august-2016/