To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,Todd.Podgorski@comcast.net, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
Subject: Demand for Administrative Investigation into Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom’s Obstruction of Justice & Data Breach in High-Profile Sandra Grazzini & Dede Evavold case
Kathleen A. Gaylord (chair) (651) 450-7775
I am demanding an administrative investigation into the illegal withholding of data from me, Deirdre Elise Evavold. Data that could have been used to prevent my malicious prosecution in high-profile Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State of Minnesota vs Deirdre Elise Evavold. Your corrupt Dakota Co. Attorneys James Backstrom, Philip Prokopowicz & Kathryn Keena conspired with Lakeville Chief of Police Jeff Long to illegally withhold the13.03 subdiv 3(e) electronic data – 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data for Lakeville PD ICR: 13001278 data from me and my co-defendants. My co-defendant Sandra Grazzini (19HA-CR-15-2669) only received a twelfth of the evidence that I received for my kangaroo court trial. I have reason to suspect that Backstrom, Prokopowicz & Keena are going to prevent me from obtaining my evidence so I can’t obtain a new trial.
I am also demanding an administrative investigation into what I suspect is Dakota Co. Attorneys James Backstrom’s, Philip Prokopowicz’s & Kathryn Keena’s illegal release of my 13.82 Subd. 7. Confidential criminal investigative data to MinnPost hack Michael Brodkorb @mbrodkorb of Missing in Minnesota @missinginmn, attorney Lisa Elliott @lmelliott18 and Elliot’s paralegal Allison Mann @AllisonMannMN. Magically and mysteriously DSC_0073.JPG ended up on the Underwatch Twitter account @underwatchEd and the Underwatch website http://underwatch.wordpress.com/. Can you guess who are all followers of Underwatch? If you guessed MinnPost hack Michael Brodkorb @mbrodkorb of Missing in Minnesota @missinginmn, attorney Lisa Elliott @lmelliott18 and Elliot’s paralegal Allison Mann @AllisonMannMN, then you are right, aren’t you? I’ve attached proof that MinnPost hack Brodkorb, Missing in Minnesota, Elliott, and Mann are all followers of Underwatch. I’ve also attached an email which proves that your corrupt Mayor Matt Little knew about the data breach and did nothing about it. I’ve also attached a response from Stearns County which is saying that they are not going to release the data they were illegally withholding from me. You’ll notice it is approximately the same time frame. I have reason to suspect that the City of Lakeville personnel will willfully refuse to comply with my data requests in order to sabotage my attempt to get a new trial. I am also demanding a signed document acknowledging that there was a breach of security and subsequently my confidential data was released to the public pursuant to 13.055 DISCLOSURE OF BREACH IN SECURITY; NOTIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION REPORT REQUIRED. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.05. I’m not holding my breath on any signed document form you acknowledging the data breach, am I?
Dede Evavold 320-293-6233
A. Co-Defendant Deirdre Evavold received 12 times the evidence as Appellant. Signed July 10, 2017 by Sandra Grazzini Page 10. Appellants’ Reply Brief, Addendum. Case Number: A16-1997 Short Title: State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sandra Grazzini Appellant. [Note: Sandra had not one but two licensed attorneys on her criminal case. Evavold represented herself.] scribd.com/document/354000486/Reply-Grazzini
Missing Evidence: – Lakeville Officer Kelli Coughlin’s preliminary audio recorded statements from – Preliminary audio statement of , Tammy Love, Rick Hakanson, Loralie Musolf, Kelli Coughlin, Jim Dronen, and Matthew Palmer – Deputy US Marshal, (Corresponding audio and video with a report.) – Stearns County Evidence (Surveillance of Residence by ) (Private, criminal investigative data for Christina Fox) – Blueray disc containing MN Bureau of Criminal Apprehension reports – Child Protective Services Documents November 2015. Appellant’s Brief. Case #: A17-200 State of Minnesota Court of Appeal. State of Minnesota v. Deirdre Evavold. scribd.com/document/352906584/Dakota-Co-Brief-Evavold-1
The objective of our rules of discovery is to encourage the exchange of relevant information by the parties prior to trial and to discourage and prevent unjust surprise and prejudice at trial, especially where the testimony of expert witnesses is concerned. See Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 307, 251 N.W.2d 854, 856 (Minn.1977). As we have stated, “trial by ambush” fell out of favor in the courts of this state over 50 years ago. See American Standard Ins. Co. v. Le, 551 N.W.2d 923, 925 n. 3 (Minn.1996). Supreme Court of Minnesota. Stuart E. GALE and Sandra W. Gale, petitioners, Stringer, J. and Lancaster, J. Relators, v. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, Respondent. No. C5-99-1349. Decided: May 11, 2000. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/mn-supreme-court/1275639.html How Courts Work Steps in a Trial Discovery To begin preparing for trial, both sides engage in discovery. This is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties about the witnesses and evidence they’ll present at trial. Discovery enables the parties to know before the trial begins what evidence may be presented. It’s designed to prevent “trial by ambush,” where one side doesn’t learn of the other side’s evidence or witnesses until the trial, when there’s no time to obtain answering evidence. American Bar Association – Division For Public Education https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/discovery.html
Dakota County County Commissioner District 1 Candidate Name Party Website File Date Mike Slavik Nonpartisan www.mikeslavik.com 5/22/2018 County Commissioner District 2 Candidate Name Party Website File Date Kathleen A. Gaylord Nonpartisan kathleengaylord.com 5/22/2018 Todd Podgorski Nonpartisan www.ToddPodgorski.com 5/23/2018 County Commissioner District 6 Candidate Name Party Website File Date Mary Liz Holberg Nonpartisan 5/22/2018 Name Political Party Mike Slavik Nonpartisan Residence Address Campaign Address 1050 SOUTHVIEW DR HASTINGS, MN 55033 Candidate Website Phone Number www.mikeslavik.com (651) 3983372 View Voluntary Disclosure Email email@example.com Candidate Information Filing Date 5/22/2018 Name Political Party Kathleen A. Gaylord Nonpartisan Residence Address Campaign Address 2301 ANTHONY SOUTH ST PAUL, MN 55075 Candidate Website Phone Number kathleengaylord.com (651) 4507775 View Voluntary Disclosure Email firstname.lastname@example.org Candidate Information Filing Date 5/23/2018 Name Political Party Todd Podgorski Nonpartisan Residence Address Campaign Address 651 15TH AVE NO SOUTH ST PAUL, MN 55075 Candidate Website Phone Number www.ToddPodgorski.com (651) 3060052 View Voluntary Disclosure Email Todd.Podgorski@comcast.net Candidate Information Filing Date 5/22/2018 Name Political Party Mary Liz Holberg Nonpartisan Residence Address Campaign Address 12195 UPPER 167TH ST W LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Candidate Website Phone Number (952) 4358723 View Voluntary Disclosure Email email@example.com County Sheriff Candidate Name Party Website File Date Tim Leslie Nonpartisan timleslieforsheriff.com5/22/2018 County Attorney Candidate Name Party Website File Date James C. Backstrom Nonpartisan 5/22/2018 Candidate Information Filing Date 5/22/2018 Name Political Party Tim Leslie Nonpartisan Residence Address Campaign Address NOT REQUIRED PO BOX 18278, 3 SIGNAL HILLS CENTER WEST ST PAUL, MN 55118 Candidate Website Phone Number timleslieforsheriff.com (000) 0000000 View Voluntary Disclosure Email firstname.lastname@example.org Candidate Information Filing Date 5/22/2018 Name Political Party James C. Backstrom Nonpartisan Residence Address Campaign Address NOT REQUIRED 860 BLUE GENTIAN RD STE 290 EAGAN, MN 55121 Candidate Website Phone Number (651) 4701736 View Voluntary Disclosure Email email@example.com https://candidates.sos.state.mn.us/CandidateFilingSearch.aspx
Final 33-602.205 Inmate Telephone Use 11580556 Effective: 06/14/2012 https://www.flrules.org/Gateway/View_notice.asp?id=11580556 33-602.205 Inmate Telephone Use. (1) This rule sets forth the minimum telephone privileges that shall be granted to inmates housed in institutions or facilities other than community correctional centers, or inmates housed on death row. All inmate calls, with the exception of those calls placed to attorneys pursuant to paragraph (3)(a), and to foreign consulates pursuant to paragraph (4)(a) shall be subject to monitoring and recording. Due to the high level of security needs on death row, the only telephone privileges available to death row inmates are those set forth in paragraph (3)(a), private calls to attorneys; paragraph (4)(a), private calls to foreign consulates; and subsection (5), calls made in the event of family crisis.
James Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney (651) 4701736 & Tim Leslie, Dakota County Sheriff (651) 438-4709:
Chapter 13 data request – Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format pursuant to 13.03 Subd 3(e):
- See attached signed informed consent form. Make sure that you include the illegally withheld unredacted Osceola County Florida Jail video visit video of Sandra Grazzini 5146__20151029_143913.mp4 and 5147__20151021_114909.mp4. I also want the unredacted confidential attorney/client audio recordings between attorney Michelle MacDonald and Sandra Grazzini that you also illegally withheld from me. I’ve attached MacDonald’s complaint filed with Chief Judicial Officer Terrence Conkel. The complaint includes MacDonald’s certificate of representation which you ignored to illegally obtain the attorney/client audio recordings between attorney Michelle MacDonald and Sandra Grazzini, right? See attached. 13001278 Florida Jail Calls. I also want the preliminary audio statements of Tammy Love, , , , Deirdre Evavold, Gina & Douglas Dahlen that you are still illegally withholding from me. Make sure to include the Osecola County Florida preliminary audio statement of Sandra Grazzini. That’s the audio statement that will outline how you duped the U.S. Marshals into arresting Sandra on trumped up charges, isn’t it? In case you try to play dumb, I’ve attached Osceola documents which debunk your “clerical error” propaganda, haven’t I? See attached. Osceloa_Kidnap_Minor. Oh, I almost forgot! I want the preliminary audio statements from Christina Fox that you, Stearns County Attorney Janelle Kendall and Stearn County Sheriff John Sanner conspired to illegally withhold from me. See previous link.
2. Transcripts for Case No. 19HA-CR-15-2669 State of Minnesota vs Sandra Grazzini ALL HEARINGS IN FRONT OF ASPHAUG 11/16/2015 Transcript Index # 26 09/26/2016 Transcript Index # 154 10/05/2016 Transcript Index # 161 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 216 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 217 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 218 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 219 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 220 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 221 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 222 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 223 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 224 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 225 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 226 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 227 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 228 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 229 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 230 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 231 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 232 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 233 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 234 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 235 03/20/2017 Transcript Index # 236. 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA Subd. 12. Pleadings. Pleadings, as defined by court rule, served by or on a government entity, are public data to the same extent that the data would be public if filed with the court. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03
- Transcripts for Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4229 State of Minnesota vs DOUGLAS CRAIG DAHLEN 12/19/2016 Transcript Index # 47, 12/23/2016 Transcript Index # 50; Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4230 State of Minnesota vs GINA SCHMIT DAHLEN 12/19/2016 Transcript Index # 50, 12/27/2016 Transcript Index # 53. 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA Subd. 12. Pleadings. Pleadings, as defined by court rule, served by or on a government entity, are public data to the same extent that the data would be public if filed with the court. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03
- Bills submitted by Dakota County Attorney’s office to indigent Sandra Grazzini for readily available, free, electronic data in high-profile 19HA-CR-15-2669. [ https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/611.271 611.271 COPIES OF DOCUMENTS; FEES. The court administrators of courts, the prosecuting attorneys of counties and municipalities, and the law enforcement agencies of the state and its political subdivisions shall furnish, upon the request of the district public defender, the state public defender, or an attorney working for a public defense corporation under section 611.216, copies of any documents in their possession at no charge to the public defender, including the following: police reports, photographs, copies of existing grand jury transcripts, audiotapes, videotapes, audio or video files on CD Rom or DVD Rom disc, copies of existing transcripts of audiotapes, videotapes, or audio or video files on CD Rom or DVD Rom disc and, in child protection cases, reports prepared by local welfare agencies. When files are provided on CD Rom or DVD Rom disc, the provider shall, upon the request of the public defender, include the software needed to open, view, or play the disc. Nothing in this section shall compel production of documents that are not discoverable under the rules of court, court order, or chapter 13.]
Dede Evavold 320-293-6233
THE COURT: And at our initial hearing, former counsel expressed he desire to address the issue of probable cause, whether there’s sufficient probable cause to support the charges in the complaint – I assume no amended complaint – although I have not received the motion, a formal motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause. Do you intend to litigate this issue of probable cause, Mr. Grigsby?
GRIGSBY: I do, you Honor. The only issue that I am able to discern from what I have, and that’s simply two complaints, is the issue of probable cause. There’s apparently a large amount of discovery that I haven’t seen. I don’t know if it has been disclosed. Apparently they want a large fee for it. My understanding is that Ms. Grazzini has been given in forma pauperis, so then we could eventually present that to the court. 11-24-15 Hearing Case No.19HA-CR-15-2669 State of Minnesota vs. Sandra Grazzini, Page 1,2 of 7.
THE COURT: Have you – are you satisfied that you have received the discovery from –
THE COURT: – the State?
MR KEIL: It is my understanding that one of the kids provided a statement to law enforcement. It’s been on Twitter; it’s been in the press. We have not received a copy of that statement.
KEENA: Your Honor, if I may just comment to that? I just received it late last week, and it’s actually on sitting on my secretary’s desk to disclose to Mr. Keil, and she’s gone today. So they will be receiving it this week. Jury Trial Volume I, State of Minnesota vs. Sandra Grazzini. Court File No. 19HA-CR- 15-2669. July 18, 2016 at the Dakota County Judicial Center, Hastings, Minnesota. Page 6.
THE COURT: Ms. Evavold, you are representing yourself.
THE COURT: The State filed a motion to compel testimony of Ms. Dahlen, Mr. Dahlen and Ms. Evavold pursuant to Minnesota Statute 609.09, Subdivision 1. A joint response was filed on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Dahlen. I have not received a response from Ms. Evavold. Have you responded in writing to this motion, Ms. Evavold.
EVAVOLD: I have responded to the District Court Administrator again on Friday about not receiving my evidence, so —
THE COURT: Did you file a response to the motion to compel?
MS.EVAVOLD: No, not with the court
THE COURT: Okay. Is the State ready to proceed? Jury Trial Volume I, State of Minnesota vs. Sandra Grazzini. Court File No. 19HA-CR- 15-2669. July 18, 2016 at the Dakota County Judicial Center, Hastings, Minnesota. Page 3.
Osceola County Uniform Charging Affidavit Case No. 15l09456; Filing Agency: Osceola Co Sheriff’s Office; Master Name#: 1011676; Case#: 15l09456; DOB: 9/30/1965; Arrest Location: 5000 Avenue of Stars – Area 26; Violation Location: 5000 Avenue of Stars – Area 26; Date/Time Arrested Arresting Officer 10/18/2015 3:48 Gonzales, Eman; Charge Offense Charges F.S.: 3F, Fugitive Wrnt – OutofState Ext 941.13 Kidnapping. Warrant#: 19HACR1526691; Court Case # 13001278. Osceloa_Kidnap_Minor
Osceola County Jail Classification: Primary Assessment; 10/19/2015; 08:52:57; Booking Number: 293281; Name Number: 1011676 Sandra Grazzini; Assessment Date: Monday, 10/19/2015 08:51 AM; Who: McNees, P; Risk Class: HMD; Final Score: 12. Risk Assessment Questions: Question: What is the current charge? Answer: Assaultive Felony Notes: Current charge Fugitive (Dakota, MN) Kidnap Minor Question: Assessment Summary Answer: Enter Pertinent Information in the Note Field Notes: Classified HMD/ Current charge fugitive (Dakota, MN) Kidnap Minor / No Past Aslt Felony / Hold for Dakota, MN / No IDP’s // PM 5170
Dakota County Minnesota Government Data Practices Contacts Responsible Authority – County Attorney James C. Backstrom Judicial Center 1560 Highway 55 Hastings, MN 55033-2343 Responsible Authority – County Sheriff Tim Leslie Law Enforcement Center 1580 Highway 55 Hastings, MN 55033-2343 Dakota County Data Subject Requests https://www.co.dakota.mn.us/Government/DataPractices/Documents/DataSubjectRequests.pdf
Recently uncovered phone conversations between Michelle MacDonald and Sandra Grazzini recorded shortly after Grazzini was arrested in Florida in October 2015, confirm MacDonald was aware her client was involved in the disappearance of her daughters – . MacDonald’s statements to Grazzini, made while she was in an Osceola County Jail awaiting extradition to Minnesota, directly contradict MacDonald’s public statements about what she claimed both she and her client knew about the disappearance of the sisters. Jail recordings confirm MacDonald knew Grazzini took her children October 1, 2018 http://missinginminnesota.com/jail-recordings-confirm-macdonald-knew-grazzini-took-her-children/
Tad Johnson, Sun This Week – Managing Editor/Dakota County/Letters to the Editor Phone: 952-846-2033 & Andrew Putz, Editor – MinnPost Phone: 612-455-6950 & Andrew Wallmeyer, Publisher – MinnPost Phone: 612-455-6950:
How would you like to interview me? I have all sorts of dirt on Dakota Co. Attorneys James Backstrom, Philip Prokopowicz & Kathryn Keen and MinnPost hack Michael Brodkorb, haven’t I?
Dede Evavold 320-293-6233
On April 12, 2018 I received a notice from Twitter’s legal team which explained they would not provide IP address information as Minnesota administrative subpoena’s did not comply with California criminal proceedings (Cal. Penal Code § 1334) . They also would not recognize the Minnesota statute related to non-disclosure and would alert the user to any legal requests from law enforcement. Twitter legal team advised that with a search warrant and Federal non-disclosure order (18 U.S.C. § 2705(b)) they would provide IP address information and not alert the user of the legal process request. At this time Sergeant Wayne and I determined the most reasonable course of action based upon the nature of this case would be to create an informal request to Twitter for the defamatory posts to be removed. Dakota Investigations (MN0190000) Page 2 of 3 Report Generated by: -() Creation: Brian Eells 2018-04-23 15:21:07 SUPPLEMENT Case Number: 18900089 Title: Criminal Defamation Dakota Investigations
On May 17, 2018 I met with Judge Knutson to speak with him about this investigation. I provided him information about Twitter’s public portal which allows a private citizen to request content be removed if they feel it is defamatory or threatening in nature. I suggested that if he made a request as a private citizen it may hold more weight with Twitter as requests from law enforcement have been unsuccessful. This investigation will be closed as inactive. SUPPLEMENT Case Number: 18900089 Title: Criminal Defamation Dakota Investigation
PARTIES INVOLVED PERSON 1 Role(s): Victim Last: Knutson First: David Middle: Race: Height: Date of Birth: Refused / Unavailable Weight: Sex: Male PERSON 1 Role(s): Victim Last: Knutson First: David Middle: Race: Height: Date of Birth: Refused / Unavailable Weight: Sex: Male Residence: 1560 Highway 55; Hastings, MN 55033 Residence Type: GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC BUILDING Residence Description: Court House OFFENSE INFORMATION Type Charge Level Description Statute 609.765.2 Gross Misdemeanor Criminal Defamation-Acts RELATED REPORTS Agency Case Number Type Description Dakota Investigations 17900122 Incident-Reference Related investigation “@johnsonmedia2” involving Twitter user Dakota Investigations (MN0190000) Page 2 of 2 Report Generated by: -() Creation: Brian Eells 2018-06-01 07:17:28 This investigation will be closed as inactive. laj424 PARTIES INVOLVED PERSON 1 Role(s): Victim Last: Knutson First: David Middle: Race: Height: Date of Birth: Refused / Unavailable Weight: Sex: Male Residence: 1560 Highway 55; Hastings, MN 55033 Residence Type: GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC BUILDING Residence Description: Court House OFFENSE INFORMATION Type Charge Level Description Statute 609.765.2 Gross Misdemeanor Criminal Defamation-Acts RELATED REPORTS Agency Case Number Type Description Dakota Investigations 17900122 Incident-Reference Related investigation “@johnsonmedia2” involving Twitter user Dakota Investigations (MN0190000) Page 2 of 2 Report Generated by: -() Creation: Brian Eells 2018-06-01 07:17:28
Q: You note on page 2 of your petition that respondent, meaning Ms. Ristau, pursued and photographed victims with intent to distribute the photograph. Do you have certain knowledge that Ms. Ristau actually pursued your wife?
A: Yes. She wasn’t with — she wasn’t accompanying my wife and my children at Famous Footwear.
Q: Did you witness her pursue your wife?
A: I did not.
Q. Did you know Ms. — are you claiming to know Ms. Ristau intent, you know what she’s thinking?
A: I can’t speak to — I can’t –HANSEN: Object as to foundation. She’s asking him to read somebody’s mind. I think if there is —
THE COURT: She’s — overruled. She’s asking about what appeared in the petition. I think she has a right to ask those questions.
Well, based on what’s in the petition, it’s obvious that Ms. Ristau pursued my wife for a period of time.
BY MS. MOORE: Q. But it’s not obvious based on the facts. Did you witness Ms. Ristau pursue your wife?
Q. And you are not presuming to tell the Court that you know what Ms. Ristau’s intent was when she took the photo?
A: I can offer my opinion, but I can’t state what her —
Q: Okay. All right.
A: I can’t state what Ms. Ristau’s intent was. Direct Examination of Michael Brodkorb by Ms. Rebecca Moore. Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) Suit Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and o/b/o Minor Children (AB, EB, BB), Petitioners, vs. Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Transcript of hearing on September 26, 2018.
SEEK TRUTH AND REPORT IT Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should: Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless. BE ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENT Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one’s work and explaining one’s decisions to the public. Journalists should: Explain ethical choices and processes to audiences. Encourage a civil dialogue with the public about journalistic practices, coverage and news content. Respond quickly to questions about accuracy, clarity and fairness. Acknowledge mistakes and correct them promptly and prominently. Explain corrections and clarifications carefully and clearly. Expose unethical conduct in journalism, including within their organizations. Abide by the same high standards they expect of others. Society of Professional Journalists https://www.spj.org/pdf/spj-code-of-ethics.pdf