Chief Deputy Dakota County Attorney Phillip Procopowicz Gives It Another Go

From: Lion News [mailto:lionnews00@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 8:24 AM
To: lsheehy@mcknight.org; Randy Kehr <director@albertlea.org>; blackwell@blackwellburke.com; boardofdirectors@ryancompanies.com; bsieben@schwebel.com; jessebg@mcil-mn.org; mknoblauch@anthonyostlund.com; Erica S. <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxe@gmail.com>; Dede Evavold <xxxxxxxxxxx@hotmail.com>; Nikolay<xxxxxxxxx@yahoo.com>; chuck.webber@xxxxxxxbd.com; cfogarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.org; nancy.platto@pubdef.state.mn.us; Michael Volpe <xxxxxxxxx@gmail.com>; Prokopowicz, Phil <phil.prokopowicz@co.dakota.mn.us>; kathy.keena@co.dakota.mn.us
Subject: Case No. 19AV-FA-14-1375 In Re: custody of LLB and EDB; Jeremy James Boles, Petitioner and Colleen Angela Crouley, Respondent ***Judge Wermager Assigned***

 

Lee Sheehy, Chair – Minnesota Commission on Judicial Selection:

Is this corrupt Chief Deputy Dakota County Attorney Phillip Prokopowicz’s latest perennial attempt to become a corrupt Dakota County judge? Hmm” inquiring minds want to know, don’t they?

Commission on Judicial Selection Announces Vacancy in the First Judicial District ST. PAUL, MN – The Commission on Judicial Selection announced today that a judgeship vacancy is occurring in Minnesota’s First Judicial District. This vacancy will occur upon the retirement of the Honorable Michael A. Fahey, and will be chambered at Hastings in Dakota County. Application materials are due by close of business on Wednesday, January 10, 2018. Interviews are scheduled to be held on Wednesday, January 24, 2018.

I helped toss a monkey wrench wrench into Prokopowicz’s failed 2015 attempt, didn’t I?

Commission on Judicial Selection Recommends First Judicial District Candidates to Governor Dayton November 6, 2015  Phillip Prokopowicz: Mr. Prokopowicz serves as the Chief Deputy Dakota County Attorney, where he is responsible for handling misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, felony, and juvenile delinquency cases. Previously, Mr. Prokopowicz was the head of the Dakota County Criminal Division, the Assistant Dakota County Attorney, and an adjunct professor at William Mitchell College of Law. Mr. Prokopowicz has volunteered for the Inver Grove Heights Parks Department as a youth baseball and soccer coach and formerly served on the Board of Directors for the Inver Grove Heights Community Schools. https://mn.gov/governor/newsroom/?id=1055-100415

And, I also helped toss a monkey wrench wrench into Prokopowicz’s failed 2016 attempt, didn’t I?

Commission on Judicial Selection Recommends First Judicial District Candidates to Governor Dayton April 29, 2016. Phillip Prokopowicz: Mr. Prokopowicz serves as the Chief Deputy Dakota County Attorney, where he is responsible for handling misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, felony, and juvenile delinquency cases. Previously, Mr. Prokopowicz was the head of the Dakota County Criminal Division, the Assistant Dakota County Attorney, and an adjunct professor at William Mitchell College of Law. Mr. Prokopowicz has volunteered for the Inver Grove Heights Parks Department as a youth baseball and soccer coach and formerly served on the Board of Directors for the Inver Grove Heights Community Schools. https://mn.gov/governor/newsroom/?id=1055-226729

Didn’t Prokopowicz also try for the open corrupt judge spot in McLeod county? Hmm? Would you mind asking Prokopowicz when he plans on giving Sandra Grazzini-Rucki the rest of her evidence for the high-profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case no. 19HA-CR-15-2669?

Co-Defendant Deirdre Evavold received 12 times the evidence as Appellant. Appellant’s Reply Brief, Addendum. Case Number: A16-1997 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, Petitioner, page 10.

Would you mind asking Prokopowicz why he would charge a huge amount of money to a data subject when they have forma pauperis status in a high-profile criminal case? Ex. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki 9HA-CR-15-2669. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=611.271

Mr. Grigsby: May I make just one point?

The Court: Yes.

Mr. Grigsby: I think if I – – if the  Court approves the in forma pauperis, then she gets it without cost. The rules don’t necessarily say they can withhold discovery until payment is made; it simply allows them to charge for costs. So there’s ways to accomplish this. They’re somehow interpreting the rule as a right to prepayment. This is not in the rules.

The Court: Okay.

Mr. Grigsby: They can bill somebody.

The Court: Right. And there is no motion before me in terms of a discovery dispute, and I sure hope that you folks can coordinate this because you need to go forward. There’s no doubt in my mind that you need your discovery.  Transcript of proceedings for the 24th day of November, 2015 for Court File No. 19HA-CR-15-2669 State of Minnesota vs Sandra Grazzini-Rucki

Would you mind asking Prokopowicz if he ever charges data subjects in high-profile criminal case the actual cost of data? Ex. Deirdre Elise Evavold in 19HA-CR-15-4227. https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/rules/copy-costs/actual-cost/

Originally charged $210 for 6 CD’s that would fit onto 1 DVD. April 29th billed another $91 for a CD of police reports received since January 22, 2016. Missing Evidence: Lakville Officer Kelli Coughlin’s preliminary audio recorded statement from Gianna & Samantha Rucki Preliminary audio statement of David Rucki, Tammy Love, Rick Hakanson, Loralie Muslof, Kelli Coughlin, Jim Dronen, and Mathew Palmer – Deputy US Marshal, (Corresponding audo and video with a report.) Stearns County Evidence (Surveillance of Residence by David Rucki) (Private, criminal investigative data for Christian Fox) Blue ray disc containing MN Bureau of Criminal Apprehension reports. … Appellant Brief, Case Number: A17-0200 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Deirdre Elise Evavold, Appellant, page 13.

Would you mind asking Prokopowicz the status of the following criminal investigations related to the high-profile Deirdre Elise Evavold case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227 and the high-profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case no. 9HA-CR-15-2669?

Summary: Request to accept a complaint that has been previously reported and is being investigated by another jurisdiction. Incident: Assist Public, Date: 6/24/16, Time: 11:58, Name: Evavold, Deirdre Elise. Hastings Police Dept. Incident Report 16-900060 (Public portion of initial criminal complaint)

Summary: On 07-20-2016 at around 1227 hours, Hastings Officer took a threats report in the area of the 1500 block of Hwy 55. Incident:Threats/stalking, Date: 7/20/2016, Time: 12:27, Name: MacDonald, Michelle. Hasting Police Dept. Incident Report 16-002285 (Public portion of initial criminal complaint)

Summary: On July 20, 2016 officers were called to city hall to take a harassment complaint that occurred at the Dakota County Government Center. Incident: Harassment, Date: 7/20/2016, Time: 12:00, Name: Michael Kenneth Rhedin. Hasting Police Dept. Incident Report 16-002284 (Public portion of initial criminal complaint)

Would you mind asking if Prokopowicz why he would bring rape charges against a suspect when the main witness for the alleged victim says the alleged rapist is innocent?

NB: No. She told me that she said she wasn’t willing to have sex with him. She felt that she got raped. That’s what she told me. When I asked her – because when she told me that she was going to the police, because this stuff happened, I asked her, “If you feel that way you can. Remember I asked you if you were okay in that bathroom and you told me ‘Yes.”

MG: And she knew that you and Igor were right outside the bathroom so if something were happening against her will, all she had to do is yell. Right?

NB: All she had to do is yell. Igor even asked in Russian – I believe that is what they speak – if she was okay and he responded that she was okay. They both came out afterwards, after everything happened, and they both said they had sex. But then after that she started not feeling good. …To me they were both intoxicated and afterwards she still wanted it – or she would have screamed if she didn’t want to have it. Like I have talked to my mother about this because it’s been bothering me since the incident happened. I don’t feel like Max should be (she was choking up about this and couldn’t speak)…. She would freak out and she would tell me afterwards that what happened. I would have call the police police right there and then. But if it didn’t happen, don’t do that to Max especially you tell me that “I hope he calls me.” That’s not rape. That’s not nothing. I feel so bad for Max. Nicole Brekkestran = NB. MG = Mike Grostyan, private investigator for Maksim Simonov in 19HA-CR-15-1637. September 30, 2015

Prokopowicz loves malicious prosecution, doesn’t he?

12/01/2016  Disposition (Judicial Officer: Wermager, Tim D.) 1. Criminal Sex Conduct-3rd Degree-Victim Mental Impair/Helpless (Not applicable – GOC) Acquitted 2. Criminal Sex Cond-5th Degree-Nonconsensual Sexual Contact (Not applicable – GOC) Acquitted  Case No. 19HA-CR-15-1637 State of Minnesota vs Maksim A Simonov

Would you mind asking if Prokopowicz why a millionaire is allegedly on welfare in Dakota county?

Finding of Fact: “The Father receives child support services from Dakota County for the joint children pursuant to the Title IV D of the Social Security Act. Order concerning discovery, continuance and temporary support. Maria K. Pastoor, Child Support Magistrate Dated: August 11, 2016. Case No. 19AV-FA-11-1273 In the Marriage of Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki vs David Victor Rucki

[David] Rucki owns three homes and is a principle in multiple businesses. Multi-Millionaire Rucki claims pauper status in court written by Michael Volpe Aug 29, 2016. https://www.commdiginews.com/business-2/multi-millionaire-rucki-claims-pauper-status-in-court-70070/

Would you mind asking if Prokopowicz if he has a personal vendetta against Jeremy James Boles?

Just two days prior to the court hearing for the Contempt of Court charges and just two days prior to the Custody hearing that was to finalize the temporary order that had been put into place by the courts my ex decided to take our children to see a therapist. During the therapy session my children supposedly made claims of sexual abuse and physical abuse against me. The therapist (whom works right by James Backstrom’s office) called the Apple Valley Police whom reviewed the therapist’s notes from my children’s first session and placed my children on a health and safety hold. The Officer never talked to nor seen my children. Not one person called me nor made a homevisit and still to this day almost two years later not one person has made a visit to my home. Mr. Backstrom is will aware of this but has allowed my children to be held from me with no contact for almost two years. The courts just recently sent me a new order out of the blue stating that they are terminating jurisdiction and that the case is now closed with no explanation. Thank You Jeremy James Boles (Unsigned statement)

Would you mind asking if Prokopowicz if he looked into the drug allegations against the mother of Jeremy James Boles’ child, Colleem Angela Crouley?

I also found the guilty party’s cell phone that she CLAIMED the non-guilty party stole from her which is false. She tossed it out of anger and could not find where it went. One afternoon when deep cleaning the cellphone was found. I charged the phone and turned it on and found a large number of text messages that can show she is selling Adderall that is getting illegally, wanting to get coke and drunk during the day whle the kids are in her care. I would love to share this phone with your local police. .. The no-guilty part has a court order that I will try to attach to this email, if you don’t get it please let me know. You may feel free to call the non-guilty party at 612-300-9452 Jermey or my number is 612-990-3593 Erica. From Erica Stufflebeam [mailto:estufflebeam@outlook.com] Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 9:32AM To Dakota County Attorney; Bellows, Dave; police@cityofapplevalley.org Subject: please explain.

Would you mind asking if Prokopowicz if assistant Dakota County attorney is a law enforcement officer or not?

From: Dakota County attorney; Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 259 PM; To ‘Erica Stufflebeam’  This Office is in receipt of you June 8, 2014, email regarding the alleged violation of Colleen Crouley of the visitation schedule set forth in Judge MCManus’ order dated May 27, 2014. This Office does not investigate crimes, so if Mr Boles believes that Ms. Crouley has deprived him of his parental rights by failing to return the children in violation of the court order, he should report the matter to his local law enforcement agency. Alternatively, he may report it to the local law enforcement agency where Ms. Crouley resides. If an investigation is conducted and the investigating law enforcement agency believes a crime had been committed it will refer the case to the appropriate county or city attorney’s office for charging consideration. Regards, Kathy Keena, Criminal Division Head.

Terry Dean, Nemmers (320) 283-5713

P.S. Did you think that I didn’t notice your dirty trick for the corrupt judge candidates for the corrupt 6th judicial district?

Commission on Judicial Selection Recommends Sixth Judicial District Candidates to Governor Dayton FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 8, 2017 ST. PAUL, MN – The Commission on Judicial Selection announced today it is recommending three candidates to Governor Mark Dayton for consideration to fill the current vacancy in Minnesota’s Sixth Judicial District. This vacancy occurred upon the retirement of the Honorable Terrence M. Aronson, and will be chambered at Virginia in St. Louis County.

Commission on Judicial Selection Announces Vacancy in the Sixth Judicial District FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE  October 23, 2017 Commission on Judicial Selection Announces Vacancy in the Sixth Judicial District Application materials are due by close of business on Monday, November 13, 2017. Interviews are scheduled to be held on Thursday, December 14, 2017.

Advertisements

Probation Violation Hearing

Dakota Co. Courthouse Hastings, MN

My contested probation revocation hearing is scheduled tomorrow (Nov. 2nd) in Hastings. This is just continued misconduct of public employees by intentionally and unlawfully attempting to harm me under the color of official authority. Even if I wasn’t falsely convicted, this would not be lawful or justified! 

“It is unjust for an accused to be troubled for an unreasonable length of time with the physical, emotional and material burdens of endless criminal prosecution.” As a matter of Fact By Sara Soliven De Guzman 

Below is a portion of evidence I recieved that is redacted to the point that it is meaningless. Apparently, all items required to be disclosed have been provided to me. On the Contact Detail page 12, it states that “this blog appears to be a conspiracty blog, though much of the attention appears to revolve around the case in which Ms. Evavold is one of the conspirators.” (Exactly, am I gagged from discussing my own case???)

“The most disturbing item of note was a video of the police interview of one of the apparently juvenile victims. It appears posting this item possibly may be a violation of privacy laws, particularly as the victim was a juvenile.” First of all, the victim was an adult when she was forcibly brought into the Lakeville Police Dept. to recant her testimony. This resulted in the addition of 4 more felonies against me instead of dismissal of the case. Secondly, this was posted prior to my trial and false conviction. The fact that the community corrections supervisor was troubled by the video and not the fact that witness tampering occurred and charges were trumped up against me, is extremely troubling to me.

Stay tuned for the outcome. . .

Deceptive Dakota County

Image result for mn judicial branch

Continue Reading: https://www.scribd.com/document/353993982/Reply-Brief-Evavold

Respondent’s Brief (Dakota Co.)

Original Appeal 2017


Related Articles:

We’re Not Crazy…The Systems Are!

Corrupt Officials and Crooked Media

Jury Deliberations

Dakota Co. Courthouse

The jury started deliberations in the Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case at 1:00 pm today. No verdict reached. Will resume deliberations on Thursday, July 28th at 9:00 am.

At the beginning of this trial, a sign was posted on the courtroom door that stated:

In order to ensure a fair trial, the Court hereby issues the following ORDER:

1. All electronics devices must be powered off, or subject to confiscation for the length of the trial.
2. No audio or video recording of any form.
3. No person may wear clothing or accessories that are designed to influence the jury.
4. Any person who diisplays facial expressions or utters verbal outbursts that may influence the jury or witnesses will be removed from the courtroom.
5. Any person who violates this order will be removed from the courtroom and may be found in contempt of court and subject to the penalties therefor.
Signed by Judge Aspaugh

Okay, let’s recap some of the fairness that Dakota County has demonstrated in 19HA-CR-15-2669 State of Minnesota vs Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.

  • Illegal withholding of evidence.
  • Wrongful arrest and imprisonment by US Marshals based on fabricated charges by Lakeville PD.  Charges: Assaultive  Felony – Fugitive- Kidnap Minor

Osceola County Uniform Charging AffidavitRisk Asssessment

  • Unfair chance to present a defense: All criminal charges against David Rucki were ruled inadmissable by Judge Karen Aspaugh at the beginning of the trial. David Rucki-Judge Knutson-Criminal Defense Matters. Today, Dakota County Assistant Attorney Kathryn Keena objected 4 times throughout the closing arguments of the defense. When questioned regarding reason, she stated “never mind.” Numerous other disruptive behaviors noted during the closing arguments: Keena ripping paper, Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom shifting loudly in his seat (why is he even there?) and David Rucki leaving and returning to the courtroom. Sounds to me like they’re a little nervous,  so maybe the jury isn’t rigged after all?!
  • Collusion – where two persons enter into a deceitful agreement,usually secret, to defraud and/or gain an unfair advantage over a third party. David Rucki, Dakota Co. and media haven’t even pretended to maintain a discreet appearance in front of the public.

4bebc-brodkorb_rucki_love_elliot_donehower_19av-fa-11-1273_012616

It should also be noted that David Rucki was shaking hands with Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom in the court hallway today.  

  • Charge Stacking: The practice of charge stacking is a simple and terribly effective method for prosecutors looking to win cases. The technique entails finding as many possible criminal counts to “stack” against the defendant in order to strengthen the core case of the prosecution.This strategy is made wide open to prosecutors, because the main deterrent against stacking charges is the law of double jeopardy. Charge Stacking: Gambling with People’s Lives

UPDATE: Attached is the four-page amended criminal complaint against Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cods3kKUsAI86TB.jpg

It’s always been the State’s position that the girls didn’t run away.” Kathryn Keena Assistant Dakota County Attorney (Stated at the May 12th Contested Omnibus Hearing ~ State of MN vs. Doug and Gina Dahlen). 

Don’t change that dial. We’ll have more tomorrow!

Some content on this page was disabled on November 8, 2017 as a result of a DMCA takedown notice from Michael Brodkorb. You can learn more about the DMCA here:

https://en.support.wordpress.com/copyright-and-the-dmca/

Investigative Reports on Grazzini-Rucki Case

Rucki girls would “suffer physical, sexual, and emotional abuse if returned to their father.”