Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

NO HEARING FOR YOU!

Preventing Blogging is Not a Governmental Interest.

For government to regulate speech, it must be “integral to criminal conduct.” United States v. Meredith, 685 F.3d 814, 819, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13012, 7, 2012-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,421, 110 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5157 (9th Cir. Cal. 2012) Typically, restriction of speech concerns a gang member not associating with other gang member; a child pornographer being monitored or restricted from the internet, defendant not speaking to victims, etc.. Speech is presumptively protected by the First Amendment. The burden is on the government to show that a defendant’s website is within one of the narrow categories of unprotected speech.

Suppressing speech rarely is justified by an interest in deterring criminal conduct, and in any event the justification “must be ‘far stronger than mere speculation about serious harms” and supported by “empirical evidence”

Protecting Reputation is Not a Government Interest.

If the Government were to say, ‘the families have been through enough and do not want to cause embarrassment or harm to their reputation’ – such would not be a proper Governmental interest. Specifically, protecting one’s reputation is not a governmental function unless it violates criminal law. 

Further, you have the right to attack people if you believe such behavior was unethical. See Wait v. Beck’s N. Am., Inc., 241 F. Supp. 2d 172, 183 (N.D.N.Y. 2003) (“[A s]tatement[] that someone has acted . . . unethically generally [is] constitutionally protected statements of opinion.”)

This is definitely vexatious litigation. Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender. Wikipedia

Advertisements

Media Dishonesty

Once again, the media is engaging in dishonest reporting and twisting the facts to cover up for the crimes of Dakota County.

“Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, according to Missing in Minnesota’s Twitter account, this is Michael Brodkorb’s outlet, she’s apparently 10 days late for her jail term. This is the woman who stole her kids and shipped them off down to western MN. She’s 10 days late for her jail term and even more surprising, no warrant has been issued for her arrest. Hmm, I wonder if that would be the same for a minority suspect. Probably not.”  Matt McNeil (Yes, she’s the epitome of white privilege isn’t she? Stripped of children, property and finances. If that’s privilege, I’d hate to see what disadvantaged looks like.)

Here’s the real scoop: Sandra’s appeal was affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded back to the district court for a resentencing hearing. There is no warrant because there is no reason to issue a warrant. 

These libel and slander tactics are a blatant attempt to confuse the public on the facts of these cases. They are also an attempt to induce hostility by using statements about race and “stealing children” to try to influence the attitudes of the public against us. The true facts of the case are simple. . .The kids ran away because of abuse, they asked for help, but were denied at every turn. The system failed to protect these children!

The outrageous actions by these people should make you wonder what they don’t want you to know.

YOU ARE BEING SUED

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

 

 

 

A personal injury lawsuit was filed against me, my co-defendants and the Destiny Church pastor and his wife on Nov. 9, 2017 in relation to case nos. 19HA-CR-15-4227, 19HA-CR-15-2669, 19HA-CR-15-4229, and 19HA-CR-15-4230.

The church, and it’s pastor named in this lawsuit have never been implicated nor charged in connection with the disappearance of S.R. and G.R., who ran away in April 2013 and stayed on the Dahlen’s ranch until November 2015.

“Because Plaintiffs reside in Dakota County and part of the cause of action arose there, the above-named court has jurisdiction over this matter and this matter is properly venued in Dakota County.” SURPRISE-SURPRISE!

The claims against us include: Loss of services of children, Intentional infliction of emotional distress, Negligent infliction of emotional distress, False imprisonment and Intentional Interference with custodial relationship. The plaintiff is seeking $250,000 in damages jointly and severally, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, costs and disbursements herein, punitive damages and other and further relief the Court deems just and equitable. (Just and equitable only goes one way in Dakota County).

So here’s the deal . . . hard fraud is serious! What is hard fraud? It’s when you conspire to invent circumstances resulting in feigned injuries and intend to cause an insurance company to compensate for the nonexistent and/or exaggerated injury. Filing a fraudulent personal injury claim has civil and criminal penalties.

When you’re above the law, however, these penalties only seem to apply to the innocent victims. Both the family court and the criminal court have manipulated evidence to unconstitutionally block the introduction of any evidence which would support abuse on the plaintiff’s part throughout these cases.

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

It’s time that our opponents are subjected to the natural consequences of their cruel and criminal actions they have so freely wrought upon us. (Let me clarify what natural consequences are for those that are having a conniption fit over at the website dedicated to deceptive and sensationalistic reporting.)

A Natural Consequence is something that a normal person could reasonably expect to be the inevitable result of their own actions. If you yell at your boss, you can expect to be fired.. If you don’t bother studying for a test, you can expect to fail.. If you treat people with contempt, you can expect to drive them away.. If you commit a crime, you can expect to face legal consequences (even if you’re part of the legal system). These are the natural consequences of your actions.  In other words, you reap what you sow. For some, it just takes longer.

We need to go beyond acknowledgment of the corruption to actually taking action. Stop operating in fear and get on the frontlines.

For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open. Luke 8:17

MN Supreme Court Petition for Review

Minnesota Supreme Court

Group photo of the seven members of the Minnesota Supreme Court

mncourts.gov/SupremeCourt

The Minnesota Supreme Court is, in effect, the final arbiter of the constitutional rights of the people of the state of Minnesota. Supreme Court decisions often serve as precedent for future cases.

Currently, the Supreme Court reviews petitions in approximately 800 cases a year and accepts review in about 1 in 8 cases. These cases can come from the Minnesota Court of Appeals, Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals, Tax Court, Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, and Board of Judicial Standards. Election contests and appeals for first-degree murder cases are automatically appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court is responsible for the regulation of the practice of law and for judicial and lawyer discipline. Additionally, as the highest court in Minnesota, it promulgates rules of practice and procedure for the legal system in the state.  http://www.mncourts.gov/About-The-Courts/SupremeCourt.aspx

Let’s see how much the Supreme Court cares about the constitutional rights of MN citizens. I’m going to take a wild guess and say that my case and companion case won’t be accepted for review. And if it is accepted, the decision of the lower courts will be affirmed.

 (Double click to zoom)

  

 

 

‘I WAS ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS’

Judge Michael J. Mayer

Judge Michael J. Mayer

July 21, 2010: A shocking recording of Dakota County Senior Court Administrator, Edie Stanke reveals corruption in Dakota County. Though this video speaks to the experience of one father, what is revealed here affects all families involved in Dakota County, and exposes widespread patterns of corruption being reported as happening in family courts across the United States, and internationally as well.

According to Stanke, she does whatever Judge Michael Mayer asks her to do, even if she is asked to break the law. Why? Stanke says “because I want my paycheck“.  

Corruption occurs when laws are broken, and the powers of government are abused to further personal interests or political agendas. When corrupt people surround themselves with other dishonest, unethical and similarly corrupt people, our society’s institutions – even our court system – becomes lawless.

A lawless court system will prey upon, and victimize law abiding citizens, even families and children. Human lives are only valuable based on their worth in terms of the incentives of the corrupt players – money, power, political influence, bribes, etc are generated from the daily operations of a court system that no longer functions based on rule of law but instead, has gone rogue.

Society now seeing the tragic result of this – when children are placed in the custody of abusive or unfit parents, and then are subjected to further abuse. Courts are enforcing orders that alienate children from their parents, many children are taken under unjust circumstances and never see their parent again. There are cases in family court that go on for years, children spend their whole childhood in upheaval and uncertainty while the court system profits at destroying families. There are escalated instances of domestic violence, sometimes resulting in murder. Families are being financially devastated, and brought to ruin by the abuse of powers happening in the family court system. In all of this, it is almost impossible to correct or overturn a court decision, even if that ruling is clearly erroneous or has violated law. When the system departs from justice, rulings are no longer based on law but instead are assessed in terms of how the players have been bought and sold.

I Will BREAK LAW for Contaminated Judge Michael Mayer ‘you betcha’ -Dakota court Admin Edie Stanke


The Nazi Defense, I was Only Following Orders

Posted by 

Nuremberg, Germany—At the end of World War Two, many high ranking German military and civilians were tried and hanged for Crimes Against Humanity.

In the tribunals many of these defendants raised the defense that they were only following orders. That defense was scoffed at and ridiculed since these men and women (yes, we hanged German women too) were involved in one of the greatest mass murders in history.

What most casual observers did not really know, was that every member of the military had to swear a personal oath of allegiance to Adolph Hitler rather than the German people or a Constitution. The penalty for speaking out, resisting or obstructing Hitler was death.

Read More: http://www.crimefilenews.com/2011/03/nazi-defense-i-was-only-following.html


Nazis weren’t just following orders but ‘took pride’ in atrocities

A new study suggests that those who carry out atrocities, like Nazi concentration camp guards, weren’t just following orders but actively enjoyed their work.

Evidence suggests that Nazi functionaries had a good understanding of what they were doing and took pride in their work
Evidence suggests that Nazi functionaries had a good understanding of what they were doing and took pride in their work Photo: ALAMY

A new study has shown that terrible acts involve not just obedience, but enthusiasm too.

The scientific paper – jointly authored by by a Scottish university professor – challenges a long-held belief that human beings harm others because they are programmed to obey orders.

Professor Stephen Reicher, Professor in the School of Psychology at the University of St Andrews, and Professor Alex Haslam of the University of Queensland, Australia, have published the paper in the journal PLos-Biology on the nature of tyranny and evil.

Continue Reading: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9694194/Nazis-werent-just-following-orders-but-took-pride-in-atrocities.html


Whether the Nuremberg Trials were fair or not is still being debated. However, what isn’t debatable is that you do not get immunity because you were just following the orders of your superiors.

I can’t even begin to identify the number of authorities and officials involved in my case no.19HA-CR-15-4227 and related companion cases.  From the Media to U.S. Marshals, Stearns County, Grant County and Dakota County Law Enforcement, Lakeville City Officials, Public and Private Attorneys, County and Appellate Court Judges, MN State Legislators, CPS, the FBI, the IRS, Psychologists, the FAA, Dakota County Commissioners, Ramsey County Corrections and Dakota Community Corrections, the crimes against us were carried out or otherwise participated in by these “authorities/professionals”. No one has stood up and blew the whistle on the clear crimes that have been committed in these cases. 

You need to stop and ask yourself if you are willing to accept the consequences that will ultimately come before you. My boss in my first professional job taught me that even if she asked us to do something illegal, we were responsible for our own actions and licenses.

DON’T KID YOURSELF~YOU ARE ALL RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLOWING THESE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY TO CONTINUE!

SHOCKER!

It came as no surprise that the MN Court of Appeals rubber stamped the decision of the Dakota County District Court in my case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State of Minnesota vs Deirdre Elise Evavold.

Criminal appeals are handled by a battery of anonymous law clerks who know that they have to uphold the conviction no matter what. They write memos for the judges that are mostly if not entirely based on the prosecution brief and they draft the  decisions affirming the conviction.

The opinion affirmed the fact that illegally withholding and suppressing evidence, witness tampering, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, obstruction of justice and trial by ambush is perfectly acceptable, and in fact, encouraged.

Gallery For > Courtroom Lawyer Cartoon

Remember, a jury verdict is only as fair as the trial, and in this case as well as the companion cases, a fair trial or appeal was never going to happen!

The tragic reality is that you can be a law abiding citizen and have your freedom and rights taken away under the current  system. The bright side is that many people are waking up and when you’re aware of the operation you can defeat it!

 

 

Comment on Corruption of the judiciary: Where do we go for help?

Tru Tuoneself
Oct 19, 2016 @ 09:28:08

I was a lawyer, fought judicial corruption in three Texas Counties and at the highest levels of government. I am no longer a lawyer. We are well beyond citing proper law my friends. I investigated, documented and testified in state courts, appellate courts, the Texas Supreme Court, regarding the corruption and I am an expert on recognizing and documenting corruption. What I can tell you is we are at war my fellow commoners, at war! The enemy is just not coming to our shores with tanks and planes, but surreptitiously has taken over our government, one office at a time, one judge position at a time, one court clerk position at a time and it is only going to get far worse, before it gets better. When someone is overly arrogant and seems not worried about the courts or law enforcement, you will know why soon enough. The arrogance gives it away and the refusal and disrespect for the law does as well. They will not enforce the laws, investigate or prosecute and they will continue to permit the pillaging, while slowly changing the laws till we all find ourselves in Nazi America. Drastic times require drastic measures. See you on the front lines.

19-Year Old Forges Ahead

Annelise Rice

Annelise Rice, a hockey player at UND and graduate of Minnetonka High School, filed a lawsuit on March 17, 2017, in Minnesota federal court seeking damages for deprivation of civil rights by tortuous intervention in a mother-child relationship and deprivation of rights under color of the law (Civil Action No. 17-cv-796 ADM/HB).

 

As expected, U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery dismissed the case on September 19, 2017. Annelise will be appealing to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Conitnue Reading:
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MINNESOTA CHILD VICTIM ACT

%d bloggers like this: