August 01, 2016 Sandra Grazzini-Rucki story/The Fix. Podcasts: Archived programs
From Michael Volpe:
What’s interesting about this audio is that the St. Cloud PD promptly provided me with my readily available, free, electronic public data but Lakeville had the City Attorney tell me that “the data supporting a search warrant is criminal investigation data which is confidential or protected nonpublic data which the City cannot release, until the investigation becomes inactive.”
One of the ways an investigation becomes inactive is upon a decision by the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority not to pursue the case. (That would seem to be appropriate to stop the continued harassment and misuse of public funds!)
The Lakeville City Attorney Roger Knutson also indicated that the City does not have a department policy on search warrants.
I then received a fraudulent bill for $210 from Dakota County Attorney Kathryn Keena instead of emailing me my free electronic public and private data. They were put on notice in December of 2015 that I requested my discovery and public data and they willfully refused to comply. That violates the MN Data Practice Law (Minn. Stat. § 13.09 and 609.43) and the law is the law!
The names of the officials present (Note that Detective Dronen indicated there were a couple US Marshals with them executing the search warrant but the list provided by Lakeville PD lists only one).
Detective Jim Dronen
Detective Kelli Coughlin
Detective Dave Watson
Detective Rick Hakanson
Detective Russ Helmueller
Inspector Matt Moran-US Marshals Service
Officer Eric Jensen-St. Cloud Police Department
Search Warrant Below (Click on documents to zoom-in)
Below is the reimbursement I received for the damage done to my door when they conducted the “no-knock” search warrant at my home.
I have contacted officials numerous times to request my evidence. On April 19th, 2016 I contacted Dakota Co.Data Compliance officials and received the information below the day after I made recorded phone calls to them.
Criminal Complaint Against Corrupt Dakota Co. Attorneys: James Backstrom, Philip Prokopowicz & Kathryn Keena For Illegally Withholding Readily Available, Free, Electronic, Public Data & Discovery For Rigged Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State Of Minnesota VS Deirdre Elise “Dede” Evavold?
UPDATE FOR: Criminal Complaint Against Corrupt Dakota Co. Attorneys: James Backstrom, Philip Prokopowicz & Kathryn Keena For Illegally Withholding Readily Available, Free, Electronic, Public Data & Discovery For Rigged Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State Of Minnesota VS Deirdre Elise “Dede” Evavold? Corrupt City Of Hastings Police Chief Bryan Schafer Forced To Respond To Data Request? Character Assassination By Star Tribune’s So-Called “Special Correspondent” Michael “Dr. Quack” Brodkorb & So-Called Officer Of The Court Ronald S. Rosenbaum Lawyer License No: 0163478? Brodkorb & Rosenbaum Are Dakota Co’s Unofficial “Hatchet Men,” Aren’t They? They Are, Aren’t They? Star Tribune’s Media Blackout On High-Profile Sandra Grazzini Rucki’s Sudden & Mysterious Release From Jail?
Friday, March 11, 2016 Poor Dede Forced The Big, Bad, Corrupt City Of St. Cloud Into Notifying IPAD Of Adoption Of Model MN Data Practice Policies? Poor Dede Is Taking Control In Rigged Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State Of Minnesota VS Deirdre Elise “Dede” Evavold, Isn’t She? Will Poor Dede Force Dismissal Of All Charges? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don’t They?
Harassment Over Chapter 13 Data Request/Discovery Request For Rigged Case No. 19HA-CR-15-4227 State Of Minnesota VS Deirdre Elise “Dede” Evavold? Why Is Corrupt Police Chief Jeff Long Sending Poor Dede Harassing Emails & Hanging Up The Phone On Poor Dede? Can Corrupt City Of Lakeville Administrator Justin Miller & Mike Garris, LOGIS Executive Director/Data Practices Compliance Official Explain Why? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don’t They? BONUS ROUND: Data Request For The Adulterous Star Tribune Hack Michael “Dr. Quack” Brodkorb’s Domestic Violence Report?
Complaint filed against Psychologist Paul Reitman
Below are documents between “Dr.” James Gilbertson, Clinical Forensic Psychologist and Guardian ad-Litem Julie Friedrich Right Click to Zoom
“20/20” ran a program entitled “Footprints in the Snow” about the disappearance in April 2013 of Samantha and Gianna Rucki; Did they tell the whole story.
WASHINGTON, April 14, 2016 – A recent ABC “20/20” report on a bitter custody battle that led to the disappearance of two Lakeville, Minnesota girls for more than two years may have ignored critical facts.
On April 8, 2016, “20/20” ran a program entitled “Footprints in the Snow” about the disappearance in April 2013 of Samantha and Gianna Rucki, who ran away from home during a bitter custody dispute, leaving nothing but footprints in the snow.
The show hinged on claims by the parents. The mother, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, said she was abused by her ex-husband, David Rucki. David Rucki, on the other hand, said she made up the allegations and brainwashed their children into believing her, which he called parental alienation.
In the critical scene of the program, Elizabeth Vargas, the show’s host, asked Sandra to provide proof of abuse during their marriage saying: “I’m asking for any of the documentation you assured us existed and we can find none of it.”
Sandra’s attorney, Michelle MacDonald, went back to her office, where producers rummaged through several thousand papers and then proclaimed, “In more than 20 boxes we didn’t find a single piece of paper or photo to provide that any physical abuse existed.”
But this appears to twist what MacDonald provided them.
According to a 42-page document provided by MacDonald to “20/20,” there was a litany of evidence of abuse including an affidavit, criminal charges and convictions, and numerous incident reports made by Sandra.
Parental Rights attacked across the nation
Maplewood v Longrie
20/20 covers the Rucki case.
Start at 34:04 to listen to updates on the Grazzini-Rucki Case
Joe Friedberg and Michael Brodkorb join Lucy Quinlivan to discuss more controversy surrounding the Jamar Clark case and prosecution following an op-ed piece in the Star Tribune published by Steven Belton entitled, “Jamar Clark case: Freeman played dog-whistle politics in communicating the narrative.” They also chat about the state of the presidential election, developments in the Grazzini-Rucki case, and more.
n. where two persons (or business entities through their officers or other employees) enter into a deceitful agreement, usually secret, to defraud and/or gain an unfair advantage over a third party, competitors, consumers or those with whom they are negotiating. Collusion can include secret price or wage fixing, secret rebates, or pretending to be independent of each other when actually conspiring together for their joint ends.
A secret arrangement wherein two or more people whose legal interests seemingly conflict conspire to commit Fraud upon another person; a pact between two people to deceive a court with the purpose of obtaining something that they would not be able to get through legitimate judicial channels.
The fundamental societal objection to collusion is that it promotes dishonesty and fraud, which, in turn, undermines the integrity of the entire judicial system. The Free Dictionary by Farlex