Law Professor James Duane gives viewers startling reasons why they should always exercise their 5th Amendment rights when questioned by government officials.
Ultra Liberal Colorado Demonstrates How the Rule of Law Is Dead In America
A shoplifter runs from Walmart after shoplifting a couple of belts. He is chased by police into a strangers home in Greenwood Village, (where else but liberal) Colorado. Police destroy the home and offer only 5,000 dollars. Two years later the City of Greenwood Village keeps delaying the homeowners lawsuit in he alleges unfair compensation. Americans now live in a state of martial law where Constitutional protections such as 5th Amendment property rights are no longer respected. This case in liberal Colorado demonstrates how the rule of law in America is dead…..
“the station manager came approximately 15 minutes later with a police officer”
Think of all the outrageous things students and professors have said about Trump in the last six months. Yet the police get called over this?
The Daily Caller reports:
College Calls Police On Student Who Said ‘Tranny’ On Radio
A university called the police on a student who used the word “tranny” on radio, kicking him and his co-host out of the studio, according to a Friday video.
The unnamed manager of the student radio station at University of Minnesota-Morris told the student co-hosts to leave the station, asserting that they had violated Federal Communications Commission (FCC) policy, but the university has since changed its stated reasoning behind the students’ suspension, reported The College Fix.
“You know, you can definitely, you see one tranny that’s trying to punch someone,” Brandon Albrecht, a UMM student, said on-air. “You know it’s automatically that one guy that you know I’m talking about. I bet you know. I’m not going to dox anybody and name them on air. But you two know if I say the tranny who looks like he’s going to punch someone. Yep.”
Albrecht used the term while discussing the lack of Antifa violence at his school with co-host Taylor Lehmann on their radio program “Deplorable Radio.”
Albrecht asserted that the station manager came approximately 15 minutes later with a police officer to kick them off air, while speaking with The College Fix.
Here’s the related video:
Mississippi judge accused of keeping mother from infant child over unpaid court fees resigns
Pearl Youth Court Judge John Shirley resigned after being accused of prohibiting a mother from contact with her 4-month-old child for 14 months until she paid court-imposed fees. (VIA FACEBOOK)
A Mississippi judge accused of preventing a mother from seeing her infant child for more than a year over unpaid court-imposed fees has resigned.
The Youth Court in Pearl has also been permanently closed in light of the accusations filed against Judge John Shirley by The Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center at the University of Mississippi, the Clarion Ledger reported.
The mother and a friend were driving through Pearl looking for work last year, while the 4-month-old child rode with them in a car seat in the back. An officer pulled them over for a minor traffic violation and soon learned both adults in the vehicle had outstanding warrants for routine misdemeanor offenses.
After arresting the women, the officer phoned the Mississippi Department of Human Services, telling them the child was “abandoned” as its mother had been detained, according to the newspaper.
The infant’s grandmother arrived on the scene minutes later, but the officer insisted they go before Shirley at Pearl Youth Court. The judge almost immediately awarded the grandmother custody but later entered an order forbidding the mother from having any contact with her baby until her court fees were fully paid.
This may not seem what it appears. Read the following article below:
Pearl judge resigns, youth court permanently closed after barring mother from baby over unpaid court fees
Second Mom In A Week Faces Possibility Of Jail For Refusing To Vaccinate Her Child
After 9/11, the United States government preyed on the fear felt by many Americans to justify the passage of the USA Patriot Act—a law that was supposed to prevent future terrorist attacks. Now, after the Las Vegas shooting, the government has another proposed law ready to go, and just as with the Patriot Act, it also infringes on Americans’ liberties, and does very little for their security.
The USA Liberty Act is the latest trendy name for a law that would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is set to expire on Dec. 31, 2017. According to the House Judiciary Committee, the act would preserve “the core purpose of Section 702: the collection of electronic communications by non-U.S. persons for use in our nation’s defense.”
However, it should be noted that while the purpose of FISA was reportedly only to allow surveillance on the communications of foreign targets who were suspected terrorists, it has been used to spy on the communications of innocent Americans—despite the practice being ruled illegal—and any reauthorization of the law will only allow the practice to continue under the guise of “preventing terrorism.”
The USA Liberty Act claims that it will “better protect Americans’ privacy” by requiring the government to have “a legitimate national security purpose” before searching an individual’s database. Then when they do have that purpose established, they will be required to “obtain a court order based on probable cause to look at the content of communications, except when lives or safety are threatened, or a previous probable cause-based court order or warrant has been granted.”
The minute this massacre happened, calls went out for gun safety policies, stemming the tide of gun violence, banning military-style assault weapons (which by the way, are already banned for the average citizen) and creating more gun laws. Criminals and terrorists will find weapons whatever the law is because they don’t abide by the law!
Shortly after the mass shootings, the media were reporting as undisputed fact that a heavily armed “lone wolf” gunman opened fire from a 32-floor hotel room on an open-air concert on the Las Vegas Strip in the deadliest mass shooting in US history.
Police said Paddock, a retired accountant, killed himself before a SWAT team breached his room in the Mandalay Bay hotel overlooking the venue for the country music concert.
The anti-gun rhetoric and calls for more drastic efforts to strip citizens of the right to bear arms is simply a policy of more government, fewer individual rights and a hyper-violent, militarized nation constantly under martial law.
The reason the official story must always, without exception, be questioned is that the government has every reason to lie or at least mislead—what they might call “perception management” or “necessary illusions.” The government must be seen as always legitimate, and always essentially rightly-guided for it to maintain its power. So it is always in the interest of the government—in this case (and many others), embodied by the police—to make some horrible event somehow seem okay or justified (otherwise, the government’s power will eventually be threatened when people get sick of too many such horrible events, as is already happening here and abroad). This benefit of the doubt that the media give to the government must be revoked by us, the people. Don’t believe what they tell you anymore because there’s a good chance that the complete opposite is true. Clinton Kirby-Liberty Road Media
JIMMY KIMMEL BASHES GUN RIGHTS AFTER LAS VEGAS MASSACRE (BUT HAS HIS OWN ARMED SECURITY)
Talk show host’s hypocrisy exposed
OCTOBER 3, 2017
Jimmy Kimmel used the platform of his talk show last night to rail against gun rights in the aftermath of the Las Vegas massacre but failed to mention the fact that he has his own armed security and recently increased it.
Breaking down in tears at one point, the Jimmy Kimmel Live host said Republican lawmakers, “should be praying for God to forgive them for letting the gun lobby run this country.”
The video is YouTube’s number one trending video and has received well over a million views overnight.
Kimmel went on to slam politicians who “won’t do anything about this because the NRA has their balls in a money clip,” adding that their “thoughts and your prayers are insufficient.”
He then turned the monologue into an anti-Trump rant, declaring, “There are a lot of things we could do about it. But we don’t, which is interesting because when someone with a beard attacks us, we tap phones, we invoke travel bans, we build walls, we take every possible precaution to make sure it doesn’t happen again. But when an American buys a gun and kills other Americans, then there’s nothing we can do about that.”
Breitbart’s Ian Mason debunks most of Kimmel’s claims, almost all of which had nothing to do with the weapons used by killer Stephen Paddock during Sunday night’s massacre.
But for Kimmel, it’s very much a case of do as I say, not do as I do.
A 2015 clip from his show uploaded to YouTube features one of the security guard’s whose job it is to protect Kimmel and his production staff.
When his shirt lifts up for a brief moment, the man is seen to be carrying a Glock pistol in a holster.
In other words – Kimmel is against gun rights, unless it applies to his own personal security.
Recent reports also confirm that Kimmel has beefed up his security due to the increasingly polarized and political nature of his rants.
According to the Mercury News, “Ever since the late-night show host began crusading against the effort by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act, there have been “incidents with Trump supporters” that have forced him to increase security at his show tapings.”
In response, “the show has increased personnel at both the front and back entrances. This personnel consists of highly-trained, off-duty police officers.”
Judging by the video clip of the security guard above, these security guards are almost certain to be packing.
Kimmel’s hypocrisy is a reminder of the fact that many liberals rely on men carrying guns to protect them but want to deny that right to the rest of the American people.
Michael Moore, who built part of his career on tearing down the second amendment, admitted in a 2008 Larry King interview that he owns a gun and also relies on armed security.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet