Reporters from news network seen speaking with authorities

Video surveillance footage of the FBI raid on Roger Stone’s house appears to show authorities giving directions to awaiting CNN reporters before the arrest, prompting fresh speculation as to whether the news network was tipped off in advance.

Despite the road leading to Stone’s home being closed off at both ends, a CNN camera crew and reporters were allowed inside the bubble to catch events live as they unfolded. According to Stone, his neighbors who were out walking their dogs were told to go inside, but CNN was allowed to stay.


Still Photos;

During an interview following the raid, CNN producer David Shortell admitted that he was “waiting” outside Roger Stone’s house at 5am, an hour before FBI agents and police arrived to arrest the former Donald Trump associate.

Shortell claimed that his “reporter’s instinct” was to thank and that he “thought maybe something was happening” because of “unusual Grand Jury activity in Washington DC yesterday”.

However, despite vigorous denials by CNN, questions continued to swirl.

Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker suggested during his testimony earlier today before the House Judiciary Committee that CNN may have been tipped off to the FBI’s raid, promptingCNN justice correspondent Evan Perez to accuse Whitaker of “trying to give oxygen to a conspiracy”.

As we reported earlier, the surveillance footage itself was not released by Stone and was likely leaked by someone inside the House or Senate intelligence committee.

Roger Stone will be on the Alex Jones Show today to discuss latest developments.

More exclusive photos from the raid can be seen below. Video footage will be added to this article later.

However, despite vigorous denials by CNN, questions continued to swirl.

Continue Reading

The goal of depicting Roger Stone as public enemy number one is to manipulate public opinion and taint the jury pool. This same tactic was used on us in the high profile Sandra Grazzini case so that we would be demonized and painted as illicit villains for committing a heinous “crime’ when in fact, no crime was ever committed by us. The real crime was committed by media, law enforcement, attorneys, judges, guardians ad litem, and psychologists.





Anmarie Calgaro Appeal

Anmarie Calgaro’s Appeal in Court TOMORROW
Tuesday, October 16th
9:00 a.m.

Warren E. Burger Federal Building
& United States Courthouse

316 North Robert Street
100 Federal Building
St. Paul, MN 55101

The Calgaro lawsuit was first filed in federal district court on November 16, 2016, against state agencies, the school, and private health services, claiming that each had deprived her of her constitutional parental rights by treating her son as an emancipated minor. Calgaro asked the courts to declare that her due process rights under the 14th amendment of the Constitution had been violated. Press Conference Statement from Child Protection League [pdf]

On January 26. 2017, local counsel for the Thomas More Society of Chicago Erick Kaardal appeared before Judge Magnuson in St. Paul, Minnesota federal court, asking him to restore Anmarie Calgaro’s parental rights. In 2015, without notice and violating her civil right to due process, her son had been unconstitutionally declared to be “emancipated.”.

Seven lawyers lined up against her to represent the defendants: the county, the Director of Public Health Services, the school district, the school principal, and two private healthcare providers. JDK, the son of Anmarie Calgaro, is also a “person of interest” in the case, listed as a defendant because he, too, has a right to be heard in court.

Contrary to fake headlines, Anmarie Calgaro is not “suing” her son, who has not violated her due process constitutional rights. Her son cannot “restore” her parental rights.

See video “Minnesota Mom Sues For Violation of Parental Rights.”

On June 6, 2017, the attorney for Anmarie Calgaro, Erick Kaardal, appealed the decision of Judge Magnuson. See “Calgaro Case APPEALED! Challenges Bizarre and Contradictory Court Ruling.”

See also Press Conference Statement from Child Protection League [pdf]
“The decisions underage children make about themselves often have permanent consequences that will affect their relationships, their families, their health and their emotional stability for a lifetime. And yet, the very person who knows, loves, and is most deeply committed to her child, is being excluded from providing for him at his hour of greatest need.”

Transgender Kids: Eliminating Caring as an Option,” October 12, 2018
From medical studies to media reports, the new “tolerance” is really hurting children.” “For the sake of their social engineering designs, and in the name of their rigid political orthodoxy,” writes Peter Heck at The Resurgent, “the LGBT political lobby is actively promoting the mutilation of young girls and suppressing all evidence demonstrating the obvious reality that this is a bad idea.

School district sent child services after mother when she reported restroom assault by ‘gender fluid’ student,” October 3, 2018

The Georgia Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is investigating a school district whose transgender restroom policy allegedly led to the sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl. The school district “sought to retaliate against a low-income, African-American single mother and intimidate her into silence by sending the Department of Family and Child Services to her door to interrogate her children and inspect her home,” the complaint says. See the video of this mother’s story.

Muslim UN’ Highlights San Diego Lawsuit Against Islamophobia Curriculum,” September 18, 2018
The federal lawsuit filed by the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF) on behalf of local parents argued that, by creating a program specifically for Muslim students, the school district is discriminating against all other students.


Ohio English teacher resigns amid outrage over ‘sick’ morality test on incest, killing,”   The so-called test tasks readers with rating the morality of 36 different situations, with topics covering everything from incest to killing innocent animals.




Your purchase
will help support

Same company.
Same products!

Go to

Copyright © 2018 Child Protection League Action, All rights reserved.
Friends of CPLAction

Our mailing address is:

Child Protection League Action
United States
PO Box 463
Mankato, MN 56002

Add us to your address book



“That wasn’t a prison sentence, that was mental torture.”

'They Tried to Mentally Destroy Me': Tommy Robinson Speaks Up After Release                                                                                                                                       IMAGE CREDITS: SCREENSHOT.

Tommy Robinson, former leader of the right-wing English Defense League and anti-Islamist activist, has been set free on bail after successfully appealing against contempt of court charges. Earlier, he was sentenced for violating courtroom reporting rules after he streamed a closed process on a gang rape case.

In a video posted on his YouTube channel, the co-founder of the right-wing anti-immigrant English Defense League (EDL), Tommy Robinson, has pointed the finger at UK authorities over the way they treated him when he was behind bars.

“What they tried to do was to mentally destroy me. That wasn’t a prison sentence, that was mental torture. If I was bitter and angry I would accept my own victimhood. I’m not their victim, I’m their target “, Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, underscored in the 5-minute clip.

The 35-year-old said that he has “got so much to say” but “feels anxious,” claiming that his imprisonment was a politically motivated move and that media took a biased approach to his case.

The video was released shortly after Robinson has been freed on bail following the London court ruling that the process, during which he was convicted, was flawed and conducted too hastily.

Earlier, Robinson’s supporters set up an online petition for his release, which gathered more than 600,000 signatures, and which specifically claimed that he was put in prison for “reporting on Muslim grooming gangs” and “informing the public of all the wrongs committed in the name of Allah.”

Robison was arrested on May 25 and accused of breaching the peace outside the Leeds Crown Court, when he streamed an hour-long video outside the courthouse where a trial for a gang rape case was taking place. He was sentenced to 13 months in prison.

Successive Prosecution

As many Red Herring Alert readers know, I was falsely convicted of 6 felony counts of parental deprivation in September 2016. I was incarcerated for 4 months at the Ramsey County Correctional Facility and sentenced to 8 years of probation.

One of my unconstitutional probation conditions ordered by Judge Karen Asphaug included language that I am not to reference parties involved in this case on any social media.

On July 31st, 2017, I was served with a Temporary Restraining Order for violating my probation condition and referencing the party on Red Herring Alert. On August 28th, 2017, I received a probation violation summons for the same offense.

Temporary Restraining Order

An application for restraining order, filed with the court, provides the victim with temporary protection until a hearing can be held. A temporary restraining order, also referred to as a “TRO,” only becomes effective once an application for a permanent restraining order has been filed with the court and served on the offender. A temporary restraining order offers the victim the same level of protection and a long-term order, but it only requires the victim to provide the court with proof that they are in imminent

Temporary orders last only weeks. Judges intentionally keep cases open without a decision as a method of controlling the parties without entering a final judgment. Among other problems, this approach denies worthy petitioners the enforceability of an order recorded in a law enforcement database and denies worthy respondents the ability to appeal. Actions that would otherwise be lawful become potentially criminal.

TIMELINE OF ACTIONS (All hearings were continued at the actual court hearing vs. prior, which means that I had to drive 1 1/2 hours each way for all non-hearings.)

Image result for Judge Asphaug

Judge Asphaug

07/31/2017  Served with a Temporary Restraining Order (Signed by Judge Asphaug who presided over our criminal trials).
08/18/2017 I filed a motion to vacate the false Temporary Restraining Order
08/29/2017  Served with a Probation Violation Summons for blog posts
09/11/2017  Served with Summons and Complaint for Harassment Restraining Order violations.
09/28/2017   Contested Revocation Hearing (Rescheduled by Judge Asphaug to 11/02/2017) Judge Asphaug indicated the validity of the restraining order needed to be determined prior to the probation violation hearing. Prosecutor: Kathryn Keena, Assistant Dakota County Attorney

Image result for Judge Kanning

Judge Kanning

09/29/2017   Hearing Motion to Vacate the Temporary Restraining Order (At this hearing, Judge Kanning rescheduled the motion hearing to 12/13.2017 to allow time for opposing counsel to prepare. Judge Kanning indicated that the validity of the temporary restraining order needs to be determined prior to the disposition of the related criminal case because a ruling on the validity of the temporary restraining order may have a direct impact on that related criminal case.) I would think so.
10/17/2017  Arraignment for Restraining Order Violation (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Mayer, Michael J.)Result: Held (Criminal Prosecutor Elliott Knetsch)
11/02/2017   Contested Revocation Hearing (Rescheduled by Judge Asphaug due to rescheduling of the motion hearing to vacate.)

12-13-2017  Motion to Vacate Hearing Judge Kanning continued the hearing per Attorney Lisa Elliott’s request to allow more time to complete collection of evidence. In the Order for Continuance, Kanning wrote, “Further hearings on Respondent’s motion shall be continued to May 16th, 2018, or until such other date following final adjudication of the pending criminal charges against Respondent arising out of the alleged violation of the Restraining Order.” (So now instead of determining the validity of the TRO prior to the criminal trial, they’re going to just have the criminal trial and the motion hearing to vacate after the trial.)

01/09/2018   Pre-trial hearing for Restraining Order violation Judge Asphaug Reset by Court to 04/30/2018 Reset by Court to 07/16/2018

Image result for judge gearin

Judge Gearin

03/01/2018  Emergency Motion Hearing to remove blog posts. Unconstitutional purge conditions were met and more were added by Attorney Lisa Elliott. Conditions again were met however, Lisa Elliott filed an Affidavit of Noncompliance and Request for Arrest Warrant on 03/09/2018 which was signed by retired Judge Kathleen Gearin on 03/14/2018. I filed an Affidavit of Compliance on  03/17/2018 and was arrested on 03/18/2018. I was brought to Stearns County Jail and transported to Dakota County Jail on 03/19/2018. I was transported to Ramsey County Correctional Facility at 5:00 PM and transported back to Dakota County on 3/20/2018 for a hearing with Judge Christopher Lehmann. He stated that I would have to wait to be heard in front of Judge Gearin on 03/21/2018. I was transported back to Ramsey County after spending the day in a holding cell. On 03/22/2018 hearing took place with Judge Gearin. Judicial order included immediate release from custody, constructive contempt of court sentence stayed until March 26th, at 4:30 p.m. in order to allow continued removal of posts. If items are not removed by 4:30 p.m. on March 26th, I was required to turn myself in to the Dakota County Correctional Facility for women on March 27th, at 9:00 a.m. to serve the remaining 26 days. (Some of the images and articles were hot linked from the Red Herring Alert site to other sites and data remained on the web for a short time before they were purged from the servers. I had no control over the cached data.)

05/16/2018  Motion Hearing to Vacate TRO. Attorney Lisa Elliott indicated that my motion to vacate was not filed within the 20 day timeline and could not be reviewed. Judge Kanning indicated that he would tee up an order to appeal the Restraining Order vs. hearing it at the District Court level.

The following objections were provided to the District Court: PETITIONERS OFFER NO EVIDENCE OF HARASSMENT – There is no allegation or evidence of direct contact by Respondent. Instead, the focus of this action is a number of blog posts written by Respondent that are either about
Petitioners or at least mention Petitioner in some way.

The blog posts by themselves cannot meet this definition, and to the extent the Court believes this definition can be expanded to included blog posts, then the statute must necessarily run afoul of the First Amendment


THE ORDER IS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR RESTRAINT – Because there are no findings of unprotected speech making up the conduct of Respondent and because the Order prohibits a large category of protected speech, the Order is an unconstitutional prior restraint.


04/30/2018  Jury Trial  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Gearin, Kathleen R.) Reset by Court to 07/23/2018  -Only to be heard by Judge Gearin-

06/06/2018   Probation Revocation Hearing Reset by Court to 09/05/2018

09/05/2018   Contested Revocation Hearing  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Asphaug, Karen)

The contested revocation hearing in file 19HA-CR-15-4227 has been rescheduled to September 5, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. at the Dakota County Judicial Center in Hastings, MN.  The hearing for this Wednesday, June 6 has been cancelled.  The matter had to be rescheduled due to a continuance in the criminal case 19AV-CR-17-16709.  Your trial in that matter is set for July 23, 2018.


Megan Loyas
Law Clerk to the Honorable Karen Asphaug

Stay tuned for updates!

The Sheeples Mantra. . .”Stop Resisting”

The shocking video shows the violent assault and arrest of a woman on a New Jersey beach on Memorial Day weekend.

Here’s how it goes down: Wildwood police officers saw alcohol near the woman and had her twice blow into a breathalyzer. She appears to pass the breathalyzer test, but the breathalyzer results are unknown. The woman states the alcohol belonged to her aunt, who was on her way there. (Probably not truthful, but hey, we were all young once.)

The woman argues with the officers about the alcohol containers and then walks away from them after refusing to provide her last name. Turns out she’s 20 and not the arbitrary magical age of 21, although that’s not determined at the time of her arrest.

One of the officers states, “All right, that’s it, I’m done with you.” He asks the other officer if he has cuffs on him and says to the woman, “you’re about to get dropped. Get over here.”

The woman shouts obscenities at the officers as she’s walking away and then comes toward the officer and pushes him away. The camera shuts off and after the camera is turned back on, the woman is heard screaming as officers try to handcuff her. The video then shows the officer’s fist swing up and down several times. The woman shouts that they’re not allowed to hit her and choke her, and after she’s been handcuffed, she turns around while she’s still on the ground and spits toward the officers. Not once does anyone try to come to her aid.

Wildwood beach arrest video: Woman hits cop first – New Jersey 101.5

Really? That sounds like a kid. “she hit me first, so I beat the crap out of her!” You’re the authority figure, you need to maintain professionalism!

Wildwood Chief of Police Robert N. Regalbuto told local media, “From what I see on the video and only on the video, from not even talking to the officers, I think they did a decent job.”

Listen, I worked in psychiatry for 15 years. I’ve been swore at, hit, and had objects thrown at me. Never once did I or any of my co-workers physically assault a patient, even in self-defense. We were trained in managing assaultive behavior through de-escalation techniques.

This police officer intentionally and recklessly provoked a violent confrontation. Whether it was due to his inability to handle his own emotions or because of training, this was an assault against a citizen.

Not surprisingly, the woman was charged with two counts of aggravated assault on a police officer, aggravated assault by spitting bodily fluids at/on a police officer, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, obstruction and minor in possession of alcohol. (Can you imagine if she was of a darker skin color? This would be the only story in mainstream media for days.)

Weinman’s attorney, Stephen Dicht, said Tuesday that there was no reason why police should have punched Weinman.

“I think it was outrageous. I think most reasonably thinking people would agree,” he said. “There’s an element out there that just wants to go along with the police no matter what they do.”.

Mayor Ernie Troiano Jr. already has come out in support of the officers.

Troiano told that Weinman “refused to comply” and police were doing their job. He said the city is taking an “aggressive stance” against underage drinking on the beach. He said police wrote hundreds of tickets over the weekend.

Coming After Us Six Ways from Sunday

Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Logo | Spivak ... Founders_Finger_Gulag

Re: Andy Ostrowski’s false psych hold and a most curious comment

Subject: Re: Andy Ostrowski — recent comment on post
Date: Oct 9, 2017 10:49 AM
JoAnne is absolutely correct in her posts.
The Americans with Disabilities Act, confirms the RULE OF LAW and the Constitution. In order for any involuntary incarceration under the 5th and 14th Amendments DUE PROCESS must be strictly observed.  All that this requires is NOTICE AND HEARING.  There is a District Court case in Wisconsin that suggests that in this regard Form TRUMPS Substance, and a totally biased finder of fact still meets the criteria.  However, this was not the situation!
An ex-parte commitment order to be enforced by Police Act is so wrong that it is a massive stretch for any policeman participating to not be legally and criminally culpable for any action on his part that interferes with the civil rights of a victim – in this case Andy.   (The fact that Andy may have given his key to someone is irrelevant – and the fact that he might have on social media made statements that were offensive to someone are not grounds for summary incarceration.  THIS IS NOT ALLOWABLE under the Constitution and ANY LAW THAT IS or is interpreted to deny basic DUE PROCESS is void.   A middle school student is required to know this fact – to require a well paid judge/lawyer/policeman to be aware of such a proposition is equally appropriate.
I agree with JoAnne — ANDY’s incarceration was WRONGFUL, and criminal.    All the miscreants involved ought to be charged with KIDNAPPING, tried and sent to jail!   The Gulag cannot be tolerated in America.
Ken Ditkowsky
 Continue Reading: